Why is Indiana Jones and the Great Circle is not even in the conversation for Game of the year?

Of course.

Harrison Ford GIF
It may not be a GOTY but it is still a great game and especially so if you are an Indy fan.

Personally I enjoyed it quite a bit and was pleasantly surprised. To be fair I expected it to be more of Veilguard or Avowed level game and instead got a very competently done and fun game with right Indy vibes.
 
Last edited:
It's not the first time I see someone saying it's kinda like an imm-sim. Honestly, if that's the case, lots of props to MS for allowing it.
Its adjacent.

Its basically IM Sim changed a bit to be more appealing to a wider audience.

I would have preferred if it was fully simulation based.

As is, its a mashup of different genres, best way to play it depends on player. I enjoyed it like a Skyrim lite, exploring with reckless abandon.
 
Was a really good game, and probably worthy of a nomination or two. Won't win a thing though.

Definitely appeals more to the age group that grew up with Indy - makes it easier to gloss over the obvious flaws.
 
Am I missing something?

Don't see many outlets writing their nominations yet, the one that we did get so far does have it in the GoTY noms.


It's in the nominee list, but it's not in the discussion as per the OP

qRzvdCln8zdmznPF.gif


 
It largely is the release date where it has the opposite of recency bias, and I think the game isn't what people wanted from the IP, even if it was good.

People really did I think want the Uncharted third-person cinematic experience, even with how stale as fuck that formula is in Uncharted itself.
 
Last edited:
After how it was especially treated at the Game Awards last year, with Ford showing up all that that bs, it really is simply a 2024 game. It's just a shame it came out so late in the year. It was in a weird spot.
 
Indiana jones deserves game of the year, being more of a "challenge" doesn't mean your game is better.
Yes it does especially if it's a well designed challenge. A game needs to have some challenge, some kind of difficulty curve to be great. Donkey Kong Bonanza- could've been a good game if there was any challenge whatsoever but there wasn't. Who does this appeal to? What's the point of even having enemies at a certain point. Kids? When I was a kid games were harder than today- perhaps too hard but at least most games had a challenge, something to overcome and get better at.
 
Indy game is easily a top 5 story of any game I have ever played. It legit felt like you were playing a Hollywood blockbuster movie. Up there with Uncharted 4 with providing top tier cinematics, graphics, world design, and voice acting. The gameplay was good, not great, but definitely one of my favorite experiences of this generation

I say this as someone who strongly believes the vast majority of AAA games have stories that are terribly written and are of poor quality. Indy game was on par with the quality of writing of the original trilogy
 
Game made me dislike Indy as an IP. What a boring slog. Why even get such an action oriented license if you're going to make such a depressed game out of it. I hope the guys at Machine Games are OK. You coulda had bi-planes and motorcycle jumps and revolvers shooting dynamite out of the air. But nah, lets root through this alter boy's shoe box and look for some text documents. THAT, is next gen.
 
Top Bottom