A couple of stupid stupid questions there.
Murray was not happy.
And rightly so. After winning a five-setter some cunty interviewer is borderline disrespectful to Verdasco and asks retarded, leading questions like in a fucking police interview, solely to whip the viewers up into a frenzy of "Murray-Mania!" No doubt he will be even more disparaging about Janowicz in the next round.
Fergie would have thrown the interviewer out of Carrington and ripped the piss out of him if he acted like that to him. He's supposed to be a BBC interviewer, not a fucking tabloid hack.
The crowd was pretty bad, too. Tennis is supposed to be better than that. Too many plebs are allowed in Wimbledon nowadays.
On the one hand I'm sort of fine with this sort of thing at Wimbledon (cunty interviewers, cunty crowds), but the tournament (and even the sport, at least in the UK, where it's still quite elitist) can't then parade itself around and continue to act as though Wimbledon is any different or "superior" to the other slams, when in reality it really isn't. It's one or the other.
I dunno, it just seems as though Wimbledon has lost something...
True, although I think there's a certain pompousness that's unique to Wimbledon which makes it extra annoying. Might be a bit of Northern bias there though.
This is what I was getting at, too.