• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Windows Central: "Based on our sources", the next Xbox generation is a traditional console and a handheld

It does sound interesting but i just dont see a market for it, except a super niche one. The OS would need to be able to run on regular PC's as well then they can claim an instant install base of a couple of billion lol.

Personally I already have that console like experience with a mini itx 4070ti build behind the TV that boots into Steam big picture mode.

I understand that im not everyone but like i said why would anyone after a console purchase one over a playstation? And anyone looking for a PC type experience can just buy a PC like i described.

I dunno seems like a strange idea to me. And very expensive. Im all for new toys though, if they make it appealing enough ill probably buy one lol.

This is my thinking I just don't think it really does anything for them and can only hurt them by causing game sales to decrease even more on their box. With that said maybe they have no choice if they want to continue to get ports for 3rd party titles.
 

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
It does sound interesting but i just dont see a market for it, except a super niche one. The OS would need to be able to run on regular PC's as well then they can claim an instant install base of a couple of billion lol.

Personally I already have that console like experience with a mini itx 4070ti build behind the TV that boots into Steam big picture mode.

I understand that im not everyone but like i said why would anyone after a console purchase one over a playstation? And anyone looking for a PC type experience can just buy a PC like i described.

I dunno seems like a strange idea to me. And very expensive. Im all for new toys though, if they make it appealing enough ill probably buy one lol.
I have not heard recently what Xbox is likely doing with this next box that I outlined as it was one of the options I was told they were researching hard even a couple of years ago

I did hear they were tired of PS destroying them at the cash register launching head to head against them and some feel they needed to try different approaches

Also the PC hybrid device likely will be very niche like you say but also the dockable handheld would be for the more mainstream

Guesses and all.
 

clarky

Gold Member
This is my thinking I just don't think it really does anything for them and can only hurt them by causing game sales to decrease even more on their box. With that said maybe they have no choice if they want to continue to get ports for 3rd party titles.
Sounds like more of a way out to me and more like a full move to PC /3rd party without completely abandoning the userbase and their librarys.

I suppose it makes sense in that context.
 

clarky

Gold Member
I have not heard recently what Xbox is likely doing with this next box that I outlined as it was one of the options I was told they were researching hard even a couple of years ago

I did hear they were tired of PS destroying them at the cash register launching head to head against them and some feel they needed to try different approaches

Also the PC hybrid device likely will be very niche like you say but also the dockable handheld would be for the more mainstream

Guesses and all.
They definitely need a different approach, and some games.

The handheld? Full fat COD and stuff like Gears on the move ? Yeah id go for that.
 
Last edited:

Kvally

Member
They definitely need a different approach, and some games.
They have plenty of games, no question. But they do need a new approach.

I did hear they were tired of PS destroying them at the cash register launching head to head against them and some feel they needed to try different approaches

The year head start seemed to work well with the 360. Maybe repeat that (minus Kinect) :)
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
Or a proper gaming experience on a handheld like the Steam Deck. But with full compatibility with launchers and apps with Windows and an OS to suit.

I'd 100% get an Xbox handheld if they can pull that off.

Microsoft has no real incentive or reason to do this. Look, the reason why Valve made the Steam Deck was because they have Steam. Each Deck buyer is another person more ingrained to their store. It's exactly the same concept behind a console.

Microsoft releasing a handheld that allowed people to easily go outside of the Microsoft ecosystem where they know that 90% of people will just live on Steam is ridiculous. It is just a piece of hardware at that point, and they're not really a hardware company. Why would they want to get into the same business space as ROG Ally and shit, it's stupid.
 
Sounds like more of a way out to me and more like a full move to PC /3rd party without completely abandoning the userbase and their librarys.

I suppose it makes sense in that context.

I've thought about this as well. They create the OS so you can have your Xbox games and they don't have to worry about licensing. From then on everything is basically just a PC port.
 

clarky

Gold Member
Microsoft has no real incentive or reason to do this. Look, the reason why Valve made the Steam Deck was because they have Steam. Each Deck buyer is another person more ingrained to their store. It's exactly the same concept behind a console.

Microsoft releasing a handheld that allowed people to easily go outside of the Microsoft ecosystem where they know that 90% of people will just live on Steam is ridiculous. It is just a piece of hardware at that point, and they're not really a hardware company. Why would they want to get into the same business space as ROG Ally and shit, it's stupid.
Good point.

They need devices that run gamepass though, if it doesn't go tits up that is.
 
Last edited:
"traditional-style successor to the Xbox Series X"

Elizabeth Warren Dnc Debates 2019 GIF by GIPHY News

Why even get into the console wars just to say what you shouldn't fight for?
 

hinch7

Member
I would definitely buy one of these though

Sounds like it would need charging every twenty minutes lol
Yeah many have been waiting for a properly realised Windows handheld. And an OS to back it up. You really need things like a proper standby and resume among other stuff SteamOS has; which is fine tuned for portables to make it a good experience. With stuff like FSR 4 coming soon, capping to 40hz I can imagine squeezing out a couple hours of gaming for current titles. The Steam Deck is pretty good if you cap framerates.
Microsoft has no real incentive or reason to do this. Look, the reason why Valve made the Steam Deck was because they have Steam. Each Deck buyer is another person more ingrained to their store. It's exactly the same concept behind a console.

Microsoft releasing a handheld that allowed people to easily go outside of the Microsoft ecosystem where they know that 90% of people will just live on Steam is ridiculous. It is just a piece of hardware at that point, and they're not really a hardware company. Why would they want to get into the same business space as ROG Ally and shit, it's stupid.
Sure they do. They can advertise their own games on their store and cut out the middleman - Steam, EGS, GOG etc. And have a dedicated portable and GamePass machine for the masses. Since its part of their ecosysten they can offer other incentives for staying on Xbox.

If they just made another dedicated machine and handheld JUST for Xbox games that would be DOA. And it will be an uphill battle since Sony are going to be in on that too, come PS6's launch. As rumors go anyways.
 
Last edited:

diffusionx

Gold Member
Sure they do. They can advertise their own games on their store and cut out the middleman - Steam, EGS, GOG etc. And have a dedicated portable and GamePass machine for the masses. Since its part of their ecosysten they can offer other incentives for staying on Xbox.

If they just made another dedicated handheld JUST for Xbox games (aka traditional closed machine) that would be DOA. And it will be an uphill battle since Sony are going to be in on that too, come PS6's launch. As rumors go anyways.

They can already advertise their own games on their store. Every windows user can access the Xbox app. They don't need dedicated hardware to do this. All that will end up happening is that most people are on Steam and MS is now selling an expensive handheld device and slumming it with the ROG and CLAW and shit.

People who think MS should offer more generalized PC hardware should look at how the Surface line is doing, and question why it's logical to get into this business even more. At least with Surface you can sell to business people who will end up with O365 subscriptions.

Good point.

They need devices that run gamepass though, if it doesn't go tits up that is.
Every PC can run GamePass. The problem isn't access.
 
Last edited:

clarky

Gold Member
Every PC can run GamePass. The problem isn't access.
PC gamers have not took to it like (whats left of) the console base. If they are to continue with GP they need a device that takes care of those folks also.

Just to clarify I dont think the handheld will run steam etc. Like you said it makes no sense to do so.
 
Last edited:

diffusionx

Gold Member
PC gamers have not took to it like (whats left of) the console base. If they are to continue with GP they need a device that takes care of those folks also.
Call me crazy but aren't people talking about the Microsoft handheld as a PC? So what makes it different from every other non-SD handheld on the market? If ROG Ally users aren't using GamePass, why would Xbox Handheld users use it? People in this thread are saying the appeal of it is that they could use Steam on it FFS! In other words what makes the Microsoft handheld attractive is that they dont have to use Microsoft on it... so what is the reason for Microsoft to do this, exactly? Those ultra slim hardware margins? That tiny userbase?

Just to clarify I dont think the handheld will run steam etc. Like you said it makes no sense to do so.
People seem to think a Microsoft handheld that doesnt let you run Steam is not viable, so yea I just continue to be confused by this idea of what Jez and others are pushing.
 
Last edited:

clarky

Gold Member
Call me crazy but aren't people talking about the Microsoft handheld as a PC? So what makes it different from every other non-SD handheld on the market? If ROG Ally users aren't using GamePass, why would Xbox Handheld users use it? People in this thread are saying the appeal of it is that they could use Steam on it FFS! In other words what makes the Microsoft handheld attractive is that they dont have to use Microsoft on it... so what is the reason for Microsoft to do this, exactly? Those ultra slim hardware margins? That tiny userbase?


People seem to think a Microsoft handheld that doesnt let you run Steam is not viable, so yea I just continue to be confused by this idea of what Jez and others are pushing.

I would buy one that did both but i agree with you that it wouldn't make sense for Microsoft from a buisness perspective.

The same goes for the so called premium console.

I dont see why an xbox/ gamepass only portable wouldnt be viable if they did it right.
 
Last edited:

Crayon

Member
You aren't going to do any better than an xbox overlay app on windows. They aren't going to make a version of windows with all the bullshit stripped out to make it smooth and light. Everyone would want to use that one for everything. If they were willing and able, we would have had that by now.
 

DenchDeckard

Moderated wildly
I would buy one that did both but i agree with you that it wouldn't make sense for Microsoft from a buisness perspective.

The same goes for the so called premium console.

I dont see why an xbox/ gamepass only portable wouldnt be viable if they did it right.

Seriously, if they nailed a rog ally type device that can play native Xbox console apps i would eat that shit up.

I do think it needs to be able to run windows os for steam etc though too. I don't think microsoft have the chops to make such a perfect device.
 

clarky

Gold Member
Seriously, if they nailed a rog ally type device that can play native Xbox console apps i would eat that shit up.

I do think it needs to be able to run windows os for steam etc though too. I don't think microsoft have the chops to make such a perfect device.
Like diffusionx diffusionx says that would make no sense for them to make such a device. So they are probably making one right now lol.

One things for sure well might find out next year....... or not right Jez????
 
Last edited:

hinch7

Member
You aren't going to do any better than an xbox overlay app on windows. They aren't going to make a version of windows with all the bullshit stripped out to make it smooth and light. Everyone would want to use that one for everything. If they were willing and able, we would have had that by now.
Idk. Desperate times. Xbox sales have fallen off a cliff. Gamepass isn't setting the world alight (BO6 may help short term).

They've been pushing the PC angle for a reason. ABK are carrying the whole gaming divison.
 
Last edited:
It still blows my mind anyone would even consider buying in if it's a traditional console. A PC hybrid that I could throw on a tv with console like ease would be a maybe to yes even from me, but a traditional console after the last 2 completely failed gens would be a hard no.

Yeah, at this point any Xbox that's a traditional system and operating with that type of business model, will fail terribly. The brand is just too damaged to ensure it, and it's not like MS will revert porting games to PS & Nintendo (6-month/1-year timed exclusives on Xbox isn't good enough for long-term platform growth), and they definitely aren't reversing porting their games to Steam at all.

So what would they have going for them on the traditional model? Features? Won't mean anything if those features aren't leaning into being more PC-like and open as a platform, at which point it wouldn't be a traditional console anyway. So same features as current Xboxes, but think they can charge a premium for more performance or handheld form factor? It will backfire within six months, maybe sooner. Doing the same traditional thing but with more power or different form factor, only works if the brand is already sustainable. Xbox consoles aren't; they're collapsing in global sales.

PS5 Pro is coming out this week so he goes on and posts this. IIRC when Xbox layoffs were announced he came out and said that he "heard" the next system was non-traditional, like a PC hybrid. It's just strange how his leaks are timed, almost like his job is to keep Xbox shills engaged and talkiing about Xbox positively.

That...that is his job xD. Keep saying, he's used for controlled PR. Wasn't there a report not long ago with someone from Xbox admitting they use influencers to put out feelers to the public, and gauge how they'll react to certain news?

Jez is probably one of the most prominent of those types. It's why the timing of his stuff is always so "convenient".

Wait by the replies it seems some aren't sure Steam will be on the next Xbox.

I was assured Steam would be there.

If Steam is there the device is platform agnostic and it is not a traditional console. People could play a whole lifetime on it and never buy an Xbox or Microsoft game if Steam is on the device. If it is not, it is a traditional console.

You cannot have a traditional console with two separate stores that provide separate licenses for the same game.

So which is it this hour Microsoft? I'm interested to see how this plays out. IMHO 99% chance it has Steam on it just because that sounds like such an Xbox move at this point.

The big question. The only question is, will it have steam or not? If it does, bad news for Xbox hardware.

If Xbox releases early it will cost them more to have a generational leap, and so that is where the high cost hardware estimates come from. If the device has steam and is releasing early and aims for generational improvements, it is likely to be costly like the PS5 Pro, BECAUSE, it will be difficult to subsidize the hardware with potential future earnings which may be zero if people buy this as a steam box. I have a feeling MS may want to move out of hardware and thus will release this device exactly as we speculate, good specs, runs steam, expensive.

As you can see how the market reacts for a 699 Playstation Pro, console market will be lost if base model launches over 599, that's the ceiling. Otherwise sales will be super sluggish. How to release a generational leap at 599 that also runs steam? Could be done easily if MS want to pay for it, but I'm not so sure. I think they will put something out that is nice, but also that they expect not to sell well and continue their push to 3rd party publishing.

That's just it: It won't be $599 and Steam will probably be locked behind some Game Pass tier.

I see it playing out like so: a $699/$799 (maybe even $899) semi-subsidized SKU for the top-line box (the NUC-like system). To access storefronts like Steam on it, you need a Game Pass subscription. MS lock you in for a 1-year or 2-year Game Pass sub that's a bit more expensive than if you got a year's sub normally. After you've paid for the sub, they do a system firmware update and allow you to access Steam & other alt storefronts normally (without needing a Game Pass subscription).

Meanwhile, they'll have another SKU where you can access Steam and stuff Day 1 and not need a Game Pass sub, but it'll cost $999 or maybe even something like $1099 or $1199 (depends on what the price of the other SKU would be; I'm guessing it'd be ~ $250 more than the cheaper SKU). Technically if you buy this version and later decide you want Game Pass, you might end up paying even more, but how much more depending on which tier.

For Game Pass tiers, thinking they'd use the following type of system:

>Contract with cheaper SKU box: Locked 1-year or 2-year rate for some new GPU tier that includes access to alt-storefronts. Cheapest sub rate going by per-month breakdown costs.​
>More expensive SKU box: Get access to alt-storefronts Day 1 without GP sub. $250 - $350 more expensive vs. cheaper SKU box.​
>3P/OEM boxes (if it happens): Likely priced more in line with the more expensive SKU box unless they include some Game Pass deal to semi-subsidize the box.​
Something else you might want to consider: these won't be Xbox consoles produced at volumes to compete with PlayStation or Switch. If Microsoft can save money on production costs by manufacturing less units, but have fat profit margins on each box, they'll take it. The traditional model as-is has become disastrous for them anyway; this year alone they're looking at maybe barely 4-5 million Xbox Series consoles sold altogether? Meanwhile even in a softer quarter PS5 was able to come within reach of 4 million units.

An Xbox moving 4 million units a year is much more doable if it's priced high enough to give good profit margins on each system sold. But to do that, MS have to shift away from the traditional console business model. Not just in costs and subsidization, but also in areas of software exclusivity, storefront exclusivity, and even completely fixed hardware specs.

Personally, when I say their only future in gaming hardware is a hybrid console/PC type model, I mean that for every aspect of the platform.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with everyone saying a traditional console will fail honestly. Is it going to set the world on fire and bring in bigger numbers than ever? No. Is it going to pull 30-40 million users in? Yes. I think that's all MS cares about right now is just keeping the console user onboard paying for GP. They aren't focused on hardware but they aren't trying to make drastic moves like this to increase hardware sales. They are done with that, they are just trying to maintain what they have while they grow outside of the console industry. I don't think they have any interest in doing things that are going to further eat into their revenue which adding steam will do.
 

GoldenEye98

posts news as their odd job
Say what you will about Microsoft but they have the resources and general design philosophy to do a nice handheld in terms of hardware(and software).

I mean I am open to Switch 2 but I just know that thing is going be a poor value in terms of hardware. It's going to be relatively underpowered, overpriced and with mediocre ergonomics.
 
Say what you will about Microsoft but they have the resources and general design philosophy to do a nice handheld in terms of hardware(and software).
Sure but hardware isn't the issue with any of the handhelds really. There's plenty that have great hardware. The software is the issue.
 

Taur007

Member
PS5 Pro is coming out this week so he goes on and posts this. IIRC when Xbox layoffs were announced he came out and said that he "heard" the next system was non-traditional, like a PC hybrid. It's just strange how his leaks are timed, almost like his job is to keep Xbox shills engaged and talkiing about Xbox positively.
I get what you’re saying but the real question is why are Xbox layoffs regarded as “bad” when every single other company doing it including Sony is just seen as “trimming fat”?
 

Taur007

Member
it's bad for Xbox anyway
Having 2 traditional consoles was bad, but having 2 consoles that coincide with each other actually sounds cool

Only problem is…if devs MUST support the handheld it can be a headache, but if they don’t have to it can be a headache for MS and players, double edged sword
 
Having 2 traditional consoles was bad, but having 2 consoles that coincide with each other actually sounds cool

Only problem is…if devs MUST support the handheld it can be a headache, but if they don’t have to it can be a headache for MS and players, double edged sword
at this point, it's not an issue of whatever idea MS has in mind. we had a consistent narrative being pushed for every Xbox strategy

1. dual entitlement/play everywhere = brings more people to its ecosystem.
2. Game Pass = increases sales, the best deal in gaming, new games galore.
3. Dual console strategy = they have the most powerful and the entry-level systems...they only need to tweak some stuff on the series S.
4. Handeld = Steam/PS games?...i don't even know what mental gymnastics they are trying to come up with now.

So, having a console or not , MS/Xbox has bigger problems to solve: Their game quality and consistency. So far, they keep missing. if they struggle just by making games on one platform, then you ad PC, PS, then Nintendo...who is gonna be the priority?

either the final product sufferers: (delays, quality) or one of the versions is compromised.

people are thinking about a secure future, even when the present is not clear to them
 

kevboard

Member
Having 2 traditional consoles was bad, but having 2 consoles that coincide with each other actually sounds cool

Only problem is…if devs MUST support the handheld it can be a headache, but if they don’t have to it can be a headache for MS and players, double edged sword

scaling games down is getting easier and easier.

just think about it. do you think even most PS4/Xbox One only launch titles would have been able to be scaled down to run on PS3 and 360?
absolutely not. Bluepoint had to completely reengineer the way textures are loaded in their 360 port of Titanfall just to get it running, with a mandatory install to act as virtual memory. and even after all that they had to cut the player numbers and NPCs down.

Forza Horizon 2 ran on a different version of the Forza Tech engine and was heavily changed to work on 360. it was basically developed as a separate product.

but now? lower texture res, lower resolution, lower all settings... and it runs on last gen. and this is true 4 years into the generation!
2 years into the Xbox One/PS4 generation, Call of Duty Black Ops 3 launched without a campaign on PS360 and with heavily cut down multiplayer as well.
meanwhile Call of Duty Black Ops 6 just lanlunched fully featured on last gen consoles, 4 YEARS into the generation, with full cross compatibility between all consoles and PC.

this trend will continue, and it will get easier and easier as more devs (sadly) jump on Unreal Engine 5.

so supporting a handheld that uses the same APIs, the same underlying architecture, and has the same basic fearure set (albeit at lower performance throughout) will not really be an issue.
all they gotta do is not memory-starve it again like they did with the Series S. the only reason developers struggle with that system is 100% memory related.

we got proof of that right now.
the ROG Ally X can play every single current gen game, most of them really well too, and is essentially what such a next gen handheld would be.
 
Last edited:

clarky

Gold Member
at this point, it's not an issue of whatever idea MS has in mind. we had a consistent narrative being pushed for every Xbox strategy

1. dual entitlement/play everywhere = brings more people to its ecosystem.
2. Game Pass = increases sales, the best deal in gaming, new games galore.
3. Dual console strategy = they have the most powerful and the entry-level systems...they only need to tweak some stuff on the series S.
4. Handeld = Steam/PS games?...i don't even know what mental gymnastics they are trying to come up with now.

So, having a console or not , MS/Xbox has bigger problems to solve: Their game quality and consistency. So far, they keep missing. if they struggle just by making games on one platform, then you ad PC, PS, then Nintendo...who is gonna be the priority?

either the final product sufferers: (delays, quality) or one of the versions is compromised.

people are thinking about a secure future, even when the present is not clear to them
Simple isn't it really? The quality of their output simply isn't good enough.

Make some great games, and by that i mean 9 or 10/10 games and people will join you eco system to play them.

7/10 games dont cut it.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Wait by the replies it seems some aren't sure Steam will be on the next Xbox.

I was assured Steam would be there.

If Steam is there the device is platform agnostic and it is not a traditional console. People could play a whole lifetime on it and never buy an Xbox or Microsoft game if Steam is on the device. If it is not, it is a traditional console.

You cannot have a traditional console with two separate stores that provide separate licenses for the same game.

So which is it this hour Microsoft? I'm interested to see how this plays out. IMHO 99% chance it has Steam on it just because that sounds like such an Xbox move at this point.

The big question. The only question is, will it have steam or not? If it does, bad news for Xbox hardware.

If Xbox releases early it will cost them more to have a generational leap, and so that is where the high cost hardware estimates come from. If the device has steam and is releasing early and aims for generational improvements, it is likely to be costly like the PS5 Pro, BECAUSE, it will be difficult to subsidize the hardware with potential future earnings which may be zero if people buy this as a steam box. I have a feeling MS may want to move out of hardware and thus will release this device exactly as we speculate, good specs, runs steam, expensive.

As you can see how the market reacts for a 699 Playstation Pro, console market will be lost if base model launches over 599, that's the ceiling. Otherwise sales will be super sluggish. How to release a generational leap at 599 that also runs steam? Could be done easily if MS want to pay for it, but I'm not so sure. I think they will put something out that is nice, but also that they expect not to sell well and continue their push to 3rd party publishing.
Bingo! My thoughts exactly.

And if it does have Steam, then obviously the hardware is not gonna be subsidized by Microsoft, as there will be no hope of recovering money via software sales on Microsoft's own store.

In that case, how the hell is it gonna compete with Steam Deck 2, which will (1) also have Steam and a much deeper integration than whatever MS comes up with and (2) heavily subsidized by Valve as they'd make their money through game sales on Steam.

And if it doesn't have Steam at all, and only the Xbox/MS gaming store that nobody touches anyway, then why would anyone again spend their money in the Xbox-only ecosystem after their decade-long consistent failure?

Honestly, I have even less hope of this handheld succeeding than a traditional console by Xbox. It will be an even bigger failure than Series X|S.
 

Dorfdad

Gold Member
they need to skip all this 2 console BS they don't have the bandwidth to do that. instead do the smart thing and take all that R&D and make a 1080p/120 hz 8inch Portable console. Sell a DOCK that allows 4K/120
connection to a TV basically a EGPU built into the dock) this allows one single product sku. Price it 200 less than the dock or comes with a basic dock for 1080p/120 output.
 
Top Bottom