A lot of that research is highly dubious. You have a tiny bit of smoke over a long period of time diluted in vast amounts of air. It can be a problem if you're in a confined space with bad ventilation and several smokers, but there's pretty much no impact whatsoever from passing a smoker on the street. A passing car should worry you a lot more, especially if it's an old Diesel. So the obvious solution is to not visit places where smokers congregate, just like I don't visit restaurants that serve fish because I can't stand the smell.
First , sorry but there are research made on all continents pointing at the same results and the only counter arguments are made from the companies making cigarettes themselves.
Heck most of the companies themselves are aware of the risk. There is nothing dubious when internal documents are themselves talking about the issue.
Second , as someone who have health problem i do have a problem when i'm near a person on the street smoking. does that mean that i shoudln't get out of my house ?
Third the comparaison between cigarette smoke and car smoke is only valid in certain cases because their componds are differents.
Don't get me wrong , both are harmfull but they are different. For the old diesel cars , there is a reason why some countries are trying to encourage people to change their cars or some have maluses ( this is the case in my country ). Again the issue is there , and not doing anything about it is dumb when you know that there is a problem.
While it might be a tiny problem, it simply isn't a fight worth fighting. Smoking already became so rare that it's just time to stop. Worry about fast food, processed food, old cars and cars with big engines first, all that stuff is at least as harmful and everybody would benefit from getting rid of it.
And there is it. the reason why i wrote up earlier.
I don't get what isn't worth fighting. people are fighting because they are inconvenienced.Not because they want to annoy smokers , we are already annoyed.
Telling people to worry about something else instead is ridiculous.
First , it doesn't change the current problem
Second , even if i worried about fast food , for exemple , the people defending fast food would tell me " why don't you worry about cigarette smoke ?"
Third , fast food when you eat it , you inconvenience yourself. You're not annoying someone when you eat a hamburger, there are no lasting effects on your vicinity. The total opposite of second hand smoke.
And you know, as a smoker, the constant bitching and moaning when smoking is already banned nearly everywhere is also rude and ignorant. I don't even visit bars and restaurants anymore because most don't have smoking sections or people bitch even if I smoke in a designated area.
You can still smoke , as long as you don't inconvenience others.. this is true regardless of your are in a restaurant or anywhere else. If the restaurant doesn't have a smoking area , then just use a restaurant that does have one , or smoke a cigarette outside the restaurant .. you're acting as if you don't have any alternatives when you do have some and you're in the context ignoring all the people who care about smoking and them too want to enjoy a space without being inconvenienced by cigarette smoke.