Can't be worse than Godzilla 2014. That was a real trash heap.
Also why link your posts when you can just quote them?
That I don't know, but I know I saw a few movies advertising their RT score.
I think with social media it's more so a thing.
They are more visible than ever before; 10-15 years ago most people had no clue how well a movie was reviewing. Now it's highly visible on the internet, often listed right where they might be buying their tickets (Fandango.com.)
To say the general public doesn't care about reviews, IMO, is an out dated adage. People in general are affected by how something is scored; highly rated stuff gets a confirmation bias, low rated stuff gets ignored. The reasons audiences "didn't care" in the past was probably more to do with the fact they never saw a review, because they didn't open that section of their newspaper.
Word of mouth is also more visible; but IMO, word of mouth is affected by reviews as well. Everything on the internet is like a slippery slope these days; "what's the popular opinion of thing? I want to make sure my opinion matches"
Do general publics care that much about ratings?
Do general publics care that much about ratings?
Tron Legacy would have been a better movie if it were just a 2hr light cycle battle with the Daft Punk soundtrack.Why are people still bringing up Tron Legacy AKA the most boring and wasteful blockbuster I've ever paid to see.
And I say this as a guy who enjoys the clunky original. At least it had charm.
They are more visible than ever before; 10-15 years ago most people had no clue how well a movie was reviewing. Now it's highly visible on the internet, often listed right where they might be buying their tickets (Fandango.com.)
To say the general public doesn't care about reviews, IMO, is an out dated adage. People in general are affected by how something is scored; highly rated stuff gets a confirmation bias, low rated stuff gets ignored. The reasons audiences "didn't care" in the past was probably more to do with the fact they never saw a review, because they didn't open that section of their newspaper.
Word of mouth is also more visible; but IMO, word of mouth is affected by reviews as well. Everything on the internet is like a slippery slope these days; "what's the popular opinion of thing? I want to make sure my opinion matches"
RT has Alien Covenant at 71 percent, but apparently wom did it in. Baywatch certainly was partly done in by the reviews but also bad wom. I also point people to content review sites like Kids-in-mind.com and Baywatch isn't something any of us wanted to see. Many factors and information sources for Hollywood to consider (blame?).
Also the fact that nobody ever watched Baywatch for anything other than slomo tits. Even then, it was during reruns.
21 Jump Street worked because it was a decent meta comedy that did it's own thing first, everything after such as CHIPS, Baywatch, etc. has no real reason to exist.
You left out the bullshit Objectivist-themes that rubbed everyone who isn't a jackass the wrong way...
People cared in the past. Ebert and Siskel two thumbs up was huge and movies would advertise the hell out of that. I just think that after these two passed on no other critics have come close to their respect and legacy in the public eye. Esp Ebert.
Getting a good review from Ebert carried a ton of weight.
But if they didn't give the movie 2 thumbs up you simply didn't mention them in your advertising.
I do agree they cared; I just mean negative critiques were far less visible.
Big Mommas: Like Father, Like SonOH then that's ok
What's the worst movie everyone's seen as a date? I had to sit through Sucker Punch AND The Great Wall because of dates and goddamnit
RT is one of the most viewed websites in the world with 25m+ unique users monthly. Audiences care a lot more than they used to.
Agreed. Let's give it $175M domestically (which is probably optimistic), then even the low end of that range requires a 3.0 multiplier off this overseas opening. That's really high for a film that's opened in every major market except Japan.I think that $800-900M for Pirates is being optimistic. China is having a holiday weekend and is majorly skewing the overseas gross currently.
Someone should get on a Pirates of Somalia movie already
Yes
Agreed. Let's give it $175M domestically (which is probably optimistic), then even the low end of that range requires a 3.0 multiplier off this overseas opening. That's really high for a film that's opened in every major market except Japan.
Man, The Rock is sure coming off obnoxious with this Baywatch stuff. Just take the L and move on, dude. It wasn't that expensive to make anyway. It's just not some mega hit
Honestly, why are we even pretending he's a box office draw? He's a charming guy but what hits has he carried? San Andreas? Uh....cause I'm thinking that movies like Central Intelligence are making their money more off Kevin Hart's name, honestly. And the Fast movies would be making bank regardless, he just came in at a good time.
Dave will be in the best movie of this year, so yeah, agreed.Cena? Not yet. Dave's gotten some good roles.
Batista's been a lot better at picking his roles than Rock.
Wasn't Triple H close to being Thor, as well?
I'm honestly shocked The Rock still hasn't gotten that definitive action role yet.
Batista's been a lot better at picking his roles than Rock.
I don't know about that. Dave has plenty of shit out there but it gets swept under the Direct to Netflix rug so to speak.
I don't know about that. Dave has plenty of shit out there but it gets swept under the Direct to Netflix rug so to speak.
All of these bombs sure are setting the stage nicely for Wonder Woman. I thought moving that to June would end up being a disaster but it looks like smooth sailing.
I know a lot of people sure like pretending he's the real star of the Fast movies and they should drop Vin Diesel from his own franchise. I have strong doubts about how successful that Rock/Statham spin-off is going to be.
Batista's been a lot better at picking his roles than Rock.
Batista is like the Rock. They both need Vin Diesel to carry them to box office success.
RT has Alien Covenant at 71 percent, but apparently wom did it in. Baywatch certainly was partly done in by the reviews but also bad wom. I also point people to content review sites like Kids-in-mind.com and Baywatch isn't something any of us wanted to see. Many factors and information sources for Hollywood to consider (blame?).
GOTG and Bond already seems like a big 1-2 over Rock.
Batista is like the Rock. They both need Vin Diesel to carry them to box office success.
If we're being real, BR2049 is gonna probably gonna underperform but that's still a big damn boost to his resume. It's a Villeneuve movie too.
Looks like he plays some generic enforcer.
I wouldn't say that's any better than Fast & Furious and Moana. Moana is better than any movie Dave has done. Mind you, I do like Batista. I'm just saying his roles haven't been any hotter than Rock's.
suicide squad. my girlfriend was extremely hyped and had been looking forward to the idea of a suicide squad film before it had even been announced, citing it as her dream comic book property to be adapted into film. any excitement i had for the film had been dampened slightly by the reviews but i hadn't seen batman v superman yet so was unsure whether my views would line up with the critical consensus and i was at least kinda confident that at the very least it could provide 2 hours of mindless action, seeing as it came from a director known for decent action flicks.OH then that's ok
What's the worst movie everyone's seen as a date? I had to sit through Sucker Punch AND The Great Wall because of dates and goddamnit