• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Wkd BO 05•26-28•17 - Rock in bay can't stop Pirates or Guardians, Alien sinks tho

Another ho-hum weekend. Pirates increase was poor. Hopefully Wonder Woman will save the box office next weekend.

So far, it's only Hobbs.

He even went back to the WWE to get something because he was desperate at that point.

The Rock has had plenty of success outside of the Furious films though. His career is fine. He just needs to be careful with his scripts. These days film are all about the concept and not the star.
 
The Rock is such an obnoxious prick for promoting his movie. I don't like him now for some reason.


Did you know the Rotten Tomatoes mobile site does not even display the actual average rating? So John and Jane going to the movies and looking up showings on their phones are bombarded with saccharine suggestions about flick being god awful horror stories like Baywatchs 16% or auteur perfection like Dr. Stranges 99% or whatever when the studio knows how to game the system with slow rollouts even though in reality they could be a 7.5 average rating and a 5.0 average rating

It really makes me si ck and the whole website nerds to be destroyed!
 
giphy.gif

Why is he smiling? His production company shipped The Last Witch Hunter.
 
Now we are stuck in Ridley Scott's garbage Alien universe since Blomkamp is now busy. Enjoy this Fox. With a 70 percent second weekend drop you aren't even making money on his movies.

Edit: I misread this you were talking about Alien Covenants awful, undeserved RT score. I thought you were talking about it's second weekend drop of 71% which means even the fans think its a trash movie.

Yeah. Was referencing how if Hollywood were to blame RT scores, then what about Alien Covenant? It is kinda funny how the number for Alien's box office drop and the RT rating have a perhaps unwelcome symmetry.
 

Ridley327

Member
Do general publics care that much about ratings?

Ironically, I think reviews matter more for films that aren't blockbuster types, as the crowd that goes to see the dramas pay much more attention to them. Good marketing is what helps to drive the blockbusters, and I can't say I know of anyone that was bowled over by how Disney has been selling PotC, nor did there really seem to be that much enthusiasm for Baywatch, seemingly in spite of the Rock's presence.

I'm sure that GitS would have done a bit better if the reviews were better, but it wouldn't have been by much and certainly not enough to save it from giga-flopping.
 

SilentRob

Member
I had a lot of fun with Pirates 5 (a lot more than with 4) and I'm happy to see it's still so incredibly successful internationally. Would love to see a sixth film picking up on the after credits cliffhanger.
 

Ridley327

Member
I bet money that Blade Runner 2 will bomb, even as a cult classic it's not that big anymore.

I'd argue that it wasn't big in the first place. The critical turnaround on the film has always overshadowed that it's still not a particularly popular film and is quite firmly a cult following. I said it in another thread that I think WB will consider the sequel somewhat successful if the worst case scenario is that it merely under-performs, which is also likely its most optimistic outcome. It doesn't have that tough a schedule up against it, but it still looks really out there for most mainstream audiences.
 

Bronx-Man

Banned
I bet money that Blade Runner 2 will bomb, even as a cult classic it's not that big anymore.
Seems like a forgone conclusion. Huge budget, R-rating, the original didn't even do that good at the BO. I just wanna know if Villeneuve can deliever the goods.
 
Seems like a forgone conclusion. Huge budget, R-rating, the original didn't even do that good at the BO. I just wanna know if Villeneuve can deliever the goods.

I'm betting it'll do about the same as Arrival, maybe a little better.

The name is recognizable but even if it lives up to the original "Living up to the original" means sidestepping general expectations on its way to being a generally misunderstood, somewhat unsuccessful mood piece that takes about 5-10 years to get critically reappraised as an underrated classic.

You don't wanna be spending $100-150 million on that.

But I don't know what the budget for this is, either. It could be less than $100 mil.

Don't hate on me, I clicked the link and read it,

This is why I like you Kenzo.
 
Top Bottom