From the looks of the trailer, production budget is clearly on display.Point Break cost $105 million to make? What the hell did they spend it on?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EJMRIQcGhY
That said, I'm shocked by the actual number.
From the looks of the trailer, production budget is clearly on display.Point Break cost $105 million to make? What the hell did they spend it on?
Chinese market collapse effecting pre-sales? Nah, it's strange it slowed down so quickly though.Updated for today--It looks like TFA is falling behind Furious 7 and Age of Ultron presales.
TFA:
http://www.gewara.com/movie/224406330
12-30 5,936 (10 days before premier)
12-31 6 pm 10,629 (9 days before premier)
01-01 9 pm 21,252 (8 days before premier)
01-02 10:30 pm 28,715 (7 days before premier)
01-03 9:30 pm 38,139 (6 days before premier)
01-04 5 pm 46,761 (5 days before premier)
No shit
It was a terrible argument, in fact.
Chinese market collapse effecting pre-sales? Nah, it's strange it slowed down so quickly though.
Definitely the last time I acknowledge your existence.
Chimpmunks and Sisters have legs. Is that always true of holiday releases? Seems very odd.
Point Break.
![]()
No shit
It was a terrible argument, in fact.
And you're annoying as fuck jesus. Definitely the last time I acknowledge your existence.
I watched Force Awakens yesterday for the second time with my brothers and saw the Point Break trailer before, thought "man this looks absolutely dreadful" without knowing it was Point Break. When I saw that it was PB I remembered the numbers and wasn't surprised at all - sad that shit like this not only gets greenlit but also tons of budget
bullshit.
Telling someone who frequently says stupid shit that they said something dumb isn't a slapfight.
The first Point Break wasn't even that big. It would be like greenlighting a $125M remake of Norbit.
Yeah, that's the thing that throws me. 100 mil for an action movie might make sense. But 100 mil for Point Break? It's not a title that holds any real cachet, yunno? And it's definitely not a title that screams "$100 mil budget" considering like 2/3rds of the original looked like it was filmed with 20 bucks and a handycam. Which was part of its stupid charm.
They probably thought the visual effects and international flavor could bring in at least $300 million globally. It seems they were wrong but I can see why they made the bet.I'd love to see the rationale behind greenlighting $100 mill+ for Point Break reboot. lol
They saw where the other Point Break remake is at, maybe thats why? Studio execs tend to be nonsensical.
They saw where the other Point Break remake is at, maybe thats why? Studio execs tend to be nonsensical.
Yeah, that's a really good point, too. But then again, the Fast & Furious movies stopped being even tangentially related to Point Break like, 10 years ago, so either way, they're pretty damned late to the game.
(assuming that's the Point Break remake you're alluding to - unless there's some other Point Break-inspired actionfest on the docket somewhere that I'm missing)
That's an interesting question, though: How much were the Fast & Furious movies up until 5?
That's an interesting question, though: How much were the Fast & Furious movies up until 5?
$1B DOM seems like a long shot. I think it will take the re-release to do it.TFA with 50% weekly drops from here on: 912M
TFA with 48% weekly drops from here on: 923M
TFA with 47% weekly drops from here on: 945M
TFA with 46% weekly drops from here on: 957M
TFA with 45% weekly drops from here on: 971M
TFA with 44% weekly drops from here on: 983M
TFA with 43% weekly drops from here on: 996M
TFA with 42% weekly drops from here on: 1.01B
TFA with 41% weekly drops from here on: 1.02B
Note these are weekly and not weekend drops.
$1B DOM seems like a long shot. I think it will take the re-release to do it.
Didn't Avatar get one?
With SW set to pass Avatar this week, my shitty MS Paint trilogy is complete.
How the fuck did 2Fast2Furious cost anything
It did only $11 mil during rerelease though. On the other hand, the audience was far less dedicated than SW fans obviously.
Who is the gentlemen saying "do it"
TFA with 50% weekly drops from here on: 912M
TFA with 48% weekly drops from here on: 923M
TFA with 47% weekly drops from here on: 945M
TFA with 46% weekly drops from here on: 957M
TFA with 45% weekly drops from here on: 971M
TFA with 44% weekly drops from here on: 983M
TFA with 43% weekly drops from here on: 996M
TFA with 42% weekly drops from here on: 1.01B
TFA with 41% weekly drops from here on: 1.02B
Note these are weekly and not weekend drops.
A re-release with the Rogue One trailer attached exclusively, even if only for a week, would do quite nicely
A re-release with the Rogue One trailer attached exclusively, even if only for a week, would do quite nicely
That trailer would leak before it even made it to theatres. I think we are past the point where people go to movies for trailers or previews.
That trailer would leak before it even made it to theatres. I think we are past the point where people go to movies for trailers or previews.
Time Magazine said:As risk-laden as coins in a slot machine are Hollywood's top-budget pictures. Occasionally one hits the jackpot. Birth of a Nation hit it for the industry's all-time box-office gross: over $15,000,000 (in 25 years). Big Parade, Ben Hur hit it for over $10,000,000 each. Snow White hit it for better than $8,000,000 to date, is still going strong. But no picture ever grossed so much in so short a time as Gone With the Wind.
At the close of its eighth week last week GWTW, playing 156 theatres in 150 U. S. cities, had brought $5,567,000 to the box office. One of Producer Selznick's worries at the time of the premiere was how long it would take GWTW to make the $5,000,000 that it had to make before it began to earn any profits at all. Priced from 75¢ (matinee) to $2.20 (Manhattan's Astor), it had toppled house records almost everywhere. Produced for $3,850,000, it was expected to gross up to $20,000,000 in a year and a half (with foreign distribution). That would make a handsome profit for Distributor (and part owner) Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and Producer David Selznick (Selznick International), who split a reputed 70% of the box-office gross. And since the book on which it was based was the fastest selling U. S. novel, it would also copper-rivet GWTW as the all-time hard-cash classic.
Now that IS an interesting story.
Someone tip off Mendelsson at Forbes, get his leering image to spread the news.
There is an interesting thread on Box Office Theory right now examining Gone With the Wind's peformance in the US by combing over media releases and articles at various points in its lifespan. To sum things up, the figure on Mojo is significantly overestimated.
This is an article from Feb 1940 published in Time Magazine
That road show run talked about above went on for about a year, before a cheaper general release of Gone with the Wind took place in 1941, and then a re-release in 1942.
The first Road show run made $23-24M. Mojo just divides this number by the 1940 average ticket price ($0.24) to get their estimated admissions, and adjusted total for that portion of the run. The problem here, as the article points out, even the cheaper road show tickets were closer to 75 cents at the time of the road show run. Some were over $2 (which would be about the same as paying $37 for a ticket currently using USD inflation).
By the looks of it, it seems like like Gone with the Wind had sold about 95M tickets in the US going into a third general release in 1947.
That works out to just under $800M adjusted using the 2015 average.
Counting in all of its re-releases, Gone with the Wind still might end up being the most attended film of all time in the US (there are some smaller issues with the Adjusted Star Wars number as well, so it is hard to say which one of those are on top), but the adjusted figure isn't over $1.7B.
That's not surprising at all. Those GWTW numbers were always suspect.
The adjusted vs actual gross conversation started to gain a lot of traction back when Titanic was blowing by everything. It makes a resurgence every time we have another significant run. The problem is, even if we ignore 5 year initial runs, proper (public) box office documentation for every release only really started to take place in the early 80s.
Doctor Zhivago apparently grossed $111M domestic, but there's not breakdown of where that gross came from. My guess is, like every film of that period, the movie ran on and off for a decade or so, eventually accumulating over $100M in boxoffice.
Mojo just adjusts the entire thing to over $1B domestic using the 1965 average ticket price and calls it a day. #8 of all-time adjusted! Never mind the fact that the film came out during X-Mas 1965, and that the average ticket price in 1966 was 8% higher than that of 1965. Or that over the 5 year span from 1965 to 1970, average ticket price increased by over 50%.
To make it worse, BOM is so big, and has been around so long, that even places like Variety and Deadline just take it at face value when looking up these things.