Tomorrowland was $160 mill for production right?
I hate that Tomorrowland bombing obviously effected the next Tron movie.
Tomorrowland was reported to be $190M. It needed a solid $400-500M worldwide, but will struggle to get half of that.
Tomorrowland was $160 mill for production right?
I hate that Tomorrowland bombing obviously effected the next Tron movie.
boxoffice.com is probably including marketing
Emma Stone is 1/124 asian
Aloha also means goodbye so yeah, thread title is a bit redundant.
Right.
Man, I just want them to announce the sequel. Hope it makes enough.
Aloha had 2 Hawaiian characters. one was Emma Stone. Also, the movie was gonna be called Big Tiki, they gave no fucks.
Aloha had 2 Hawaiian characters. one was Emma Stone. Also, the movie was gonna be called Big Tiki, they gave no fucks.
Actually it was gonna be called Deep Tiki, which would have been hilarious.
Actually it was gonna be called Deep Tiki,
I'm surprised Aloha even made that much money. I was expecting Blackhat-level bomb.
Obviously, I should have starred in Aloha.
I'm actually half Hawaiian and half Chinese so it works out, dammit
At least Aloha inspired someone to make a pretty good joke:
Too ethnic for hollywood, they want something real.
At least Aloha inspired someone to make a pretty good joke:
At least Aloha inspired someone to make a pretty good joke:
Nothing but AAA, good but predictable.
Because they don't think it looks interesting? The only reason I saw it was because it was something new and I had been bored all week and I didn't end up liking it all that much. The marketing didn't make me excited at all.why don't people want to see mad max ?
Well I can talk about how diffucult was for me to drag people to see MM:why don't people want to see mad max ?
Yeah it's a good hold. If its trajectory continues (-45% w/e to w/e, -39% week to week) it will make $163M domestic in 15 weeks.
I'm surprised Aloha even made that much money. I was expecting Blackhat-level bomb.
why don't people want to see mad max ?
Aloha is worse than you could have imagined. I thought at the very least you would see pretty Hawaii scenery but it all takes place indoors.
Cameron Crowe has had such a bizarre career.
I've never even heard of Aloha until now.
1) A glut of loud explosion-filled *bad* action movies has people wary when trailers seem to advertise loud, explosion-filled action.
2) It's a sequel to a 30 year old film series that previously starred a guy most people recognize as being a misogynist racist anti-semite who beat his wife.
3) It's aesthetics aren't universal. It's beautifully ugly, but some people are just going to see the ugly part.
4) It's Rated R, and it seems to be unapologetically violent.
So basically, there's going to be a lot of people who expect a crappy, wink-nod-nudge-nudge sequel to a movie they might never have watched, filled with a bunch of ugly nastiness that never stops being ugly and nasty.
Not that I agree with any of that, but I gotta imagine any combination of those four factors could have contributed to people wanting to stay away from the film, despite the almost unanimous word of mouth from people who actually did go see it.
Mad Max deserves way higher, why is it so low?
I really do wonder at what point marketing becomes responsible for a film's lack of success. Obviously the success of a film does not depend on its quality. One could argue that marketing has more of an effect on a film's success, especially given the fact that marketing plays a large part of a film's total final expenses.
I could definitely argue that John Carter had no reason to fail at the box office based on the merit of the film itself but rather that the marketing was so godawful, that it was largely responsible for the films final losses.
Mad Max deserves way higher, why is it so low?
Not likely, unless it has a huge run in Japan.So will Ultron pass up Furious 7?
That Tomorrowland bomba ... woaaaah ...
Big budget movies starring Clooney always do very poorly. I wonder why they cast him. Makes no sense.