• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Wkd Box Office 12•18-20•15 - Force Awakens does good... gOOOood, opens w/ $248m

Status
Not open for further replies.
The fact many on box office forums would see this as a major disappointment if this does 900 mil domestically and not a billion is pretty telling how absurd this has gotten.

The fact that it is going to beat the already insane record is a feat in itself. I think they just got a little too excited after seeing the weekday numbers.

I just wonder how it will behave next week.
 

Jumeira

Banned
Granted the only Star Trek stuff I've seen is the JJ movies, but I didn't get the huge success gap between ST and SW.

Star Wars is just so big. Pop culture eats it up.
I don't like the ST universe, the tech wasn't nearly as cool, the characters wernt as creative (im not an expert, speaking as a bystander) and there was so much material, so many threads to consume (as opposed to 3 SW movies) it just wasnt accessible. There was also the stigma of hardcore geeks associated to it as a child. While SW is geeky it had a sense of cool ST never achieved, SW hype was everywhere and that helped, at least for me growing up. And the Force as a concept was, if you'd obsess about it, something you could take home and get lost with. Thought that was really powerful for a lot of fans.

JJ ST films were a great way of opening that universe to new comers and I enjoyed his films, but it still doesn't hold a candle to SW for me.
 
I am pretty literally just a day or two you said something along the lines of: Holy shit this might actually do 50 mil on Christmas.

Which was because 50 was just a pipe dream and then we get high on crazy predictions and start getting mad when it doesn't triple every single daily all time record and instead only doubles the Christmas record.

The fact many on box office forums would see this as a major disappointment if this does 900 mil domestically and not a billion is pretty telling how absurd this has gotten.

And we've already done this particular dance at LEAST once when it came to the opening weekend, too. It was one of the bigger worries surrounding the movie in here, I believe: That irresponsible writers chasing stupid-sounding headlines would set the bar so high (Ultron style) that even crushing records would come off as disappointing.
 

Cheebo

Banned
I guess. I guess you can compare the TF viewers to Marvel movie viewers. They don't give a shit about the franchise outside the movies I guess?

I guess no matter what they'll eat up the sequels like fish. Dopey sheep fish.


I think the difference is for most MCU and Bayformers fans these live action films did not come out till they were already adults or teens. The nostalgia for the brand is there but not this actual live action "canon". There is no nostalgia standards at play like there is with the OT with Star Wars. There is no gold standard to judge against that if it doesn't match up they will tear it to shreds ala the prequels. They are just happy to see a Captain America or Optimis Prime on screen live action and will take anything they can get.

Harry Potter is similar. Some of the film adaptions are downright embarrassing as stand alone movies from a script and story telling perspective if you are not readers the books, which should never be the case when it comes to novel adaptions. But it's Pottsr, on screen! So fans will take what they can get.
 
the kids needed to see Return of Jafar more than anything.

And it was such a trash rip-off of the first movie with worse animation, songs, and creativity. But it made a shitload of money, and that's all that mattered in the end to ensure a line of terrible Disney DTV films
I've always wondered why their highest grossing animated movie of all time (adjusted), Lion King, only got 2 shitty DTV sequels and not an actual budgeted one. But I guess it makes sense since Lion King 2 made $450 million fucking dollars. and 1.5 made $55m in 3 days. And they cost peanuts to make.

All of that DTV sequel shenanigans actually makes sense now. Frozen will still most likely get a proper released sequel though.
 

rjinaz

Member
I've always wondered why their highest grossing animated movie of all time (adjusted), Lion King, only got 2 shitty DTV sequels and not an actual budgeted one. But I guess it makes sense since Lion King 2 made $450 million fucking dollars. and 1.5 made $55m in 3 days. And they cost peanuts to make.

They need to take it out of their damn vault so I can give them more money for Lion King.
 
Holy SHIT
In September 2001, it was reported that Simba's Pride had sold more than 15 million copies. Overall, consumer spending on The Lion King II: Simba's Pride accumulated about $300 million — roughly the same figure of its predecessor's theatrical release at that time, and continues to be one of the top-selling direct-to-video release of all time, with $464.5 million worldwide in sales and rentals.
I reallllyyy wanna know how Disney does this shit.

Its always a little funny to me how 10 years later Shrek 2 is still the biggest CG movie domestically at $441m.

Shrek 2

Frozen 2 might pass this but who knows. After seeing how massive Lion King is (along with the massive Broadway plays), I wonder if a proper lion king 2 in the early 2000s could've made that much cash.
 
I reallllyyy wanna know how Disney does this shit.

DID that shit, actually. Late 90s/early 2000s, that Direct To Video practice, while making them assloads of money, was also seen to have been one of the biggest aspects of their brand's devaluing in the eyes of consumers.

The practice largely ceased shortly after Lasseter got in there.
 

GhaleonEB

Member
Two random notes: Today's TFA US gross will put it over Phantom Menace final US figure, and park it at #6 on the US box office chart. In 9 days.

Thing two, while it's generally true that sequels do worse than the originals, there are exceptions. Each film in the Lord of the Rings films made more than the next, in both the US and internationally. Star Wars is highly unlikely to repeat that pattern given the enormous pent up demand for a non-ass sequel, though.
 

rjinaz

Member
Two random notes: Today's TFA US gross will put it over Phantom Menace final US figure, and park it at #6 on the US box office chart. In 9 days.

Thing two, while it's generally true that sequels do worse than the originals, there are exceptions. Each film in the Lord of the Rings films made more than the next, in both the US and internationally. Star Wars is highly unlikely to repeat that pattern given the enormous pent up demand for a non-ass sequel, though.

That is crazy. Hype for that movie was crazy.
 

Branduil

Member
It will be basically impossible for episode VIII to top TFA, if for no other reason than that TFA is probably going to get very close to the theoretical max for domestic box office.
 

Matt_

World's #1 One Direction Fan: Everyone else in the room can see it, everyone else but you~~~
Joy had quite a good opening with $6.85m
That's a bigger first day than American Hustle had last year, although that had a week in limited release before it went wide

Jennifer Lawrence proving that shes one of the few actors out there that can open a movie on their name
 

liquidtmd

Banned
I can't even begin to imagine how Ridley and Boyega are feeling right now in terms of witnessing themselves be box office record breakers from relative unknowness
 
It will be basically impossible for episode VIII to top TFA, if for no other reason than that TFA is probably going to get very close to the theoretical max for domestic box office.

Disney: Oh, wow, look China, Donnie Yen just got into Episode VIII too somehow because fuck it, I dunno

China: $$$$$$
 
Joy had quite a good opening with $6.85m
That's a bigger first day than American Hustle had last year, although that had a week in limited release before it went wide

Jennifer Lawrence proving that shes one of the few actors out there that can open a movie on their name
Yeah and the trailer barely had any plot. It was basically a showcase of her acting the entire time. My friends and I saw the trailer before spotlight and everyone was asking "what the fuck is that movie even about?"
 

border

Member
I can't even begin to imagine how Ridley and Boyega are feeling right now in terms of witnessing themselves be box office record breakers from relative unknowness

Considering what happened to Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher, Hayden Christensen, and Ewan McGregor, I imagine they are keeping their expectations firmly in check.
 
Considering what happened to Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher, Hayden Christensen, and Ewan McGregor, I imagine they are keeping their expectations firmly in check.

Nothing really "happened" to those people. Fisher didn't really want to act all that much in the first place (She's a writer, first and foremost, which is what she ended up doing, primarily). Hamill & Christensen's careers went sideways for a little bit (Hamill recovered pretty nicely) and McGregor's never not been fine.
 
I reallllyyy wanna know how Disney does this shit.



Frozen 2 might pass this but who knows. After seeing how massive Lion King is (along with the massive Broadway plays), I wonder if a proper lion king 2 in the early 2000s could've made that much cash.
After seeing The Lion King 3D make oodles of cash for a limited engagement I was kind of hoping that would encourage Disney to return to hand-drawn in theaters, even if it were in the form of a sequel to something. They did make a Lion King TV movie, but that's a bit of a stretch. Oh well.
 

Ridley327

Member
Nothing really "happened" to those people. Fisher didn't really want to act all that much in the first place (She's a writer, first and foremost, which is what she ended up doing, primarily). Hamill & Christensen's careers went sideways for a little bit (Hamill recovered pretty nicely) and McGregor's never not been fine.
Yeah, McGregor was doing damn fine before the prequels and has done just swell after them. I think everyone tries to compare everyone to Ford in terms of their bankability, and that's so unfair since the vast majority of non-Star Wars actors aren't even on that level.


Christensen is the only one who really went down the tubes, and that tends to be what happens when you have all the charm of a troglodyte serial killer.
 

border

Member
4PM, 7PM and 10PM screenings are all sold out at the IMAX in my city.

It's probably to be expected given that it's the only TRUE IMAX in the region, but damn that's pretty impressive for a second weekend.
 

border

Member
Nothing really "happened" to those people. Fisher didn't really want to act all that much in the first place (She's a writer, first and foremost, which is what she ended up doing, primarily). Hamill & Christensen's careers went sideways for a little bit (Hamill recovered pretty nicely) and McGregor's never not been fine.

I'm not sure if I would qualify Wing Commander games and voice acting gigs as a great recovery for someone who starred in the highest grossing film of all-time, but that's neither here nor there.

None of them continued to get leading roles in a Hollywood tentpole pictures. They've all had respectable careers and never wound up doing infomercials or anything.....but aside from Harrison Ford, Star Wars has always been much bigger than its leading actors. I mostly just meant that Boyega and Ridley probably shouldn't be imagining $10M paychecks in their future, not that they will be cleaning toilets or anything.
 
Not only is trying to compare every Star Wars actor's success to Harrison Ford's sorta unfair in terms of Star Wars, but in terms of acting in general. Dude was pretty much the single biggest movie star in Hollywood - TWICE.

None of them continued to get leading roles in a Hollywood tentpole pictures.

Two of them did, and those two didn't seem to be exclusively pursuing that as their primary career path anyway.

Boyega and Ridley are likely going to get to do whatever the fuck they want for awhile, like McGregor did. He didn't "fail" at scoring whatever picture he wanted (and doing well in those pictures) he basically took the financial security as an opportunity to actually pursue all the shit he wanted to do. So did Fisher, really.

I'm not sure if I would qualify Wing Commander games and voice acting gigs as a great recovery

I said "pretty nicely," though, not "great," so like...

Basically, your whole point is pretty silly. Like there's only one possible career path out of Star Wars and if you don't track with it, you somehow fucked it up. Especially when the career path you're using as a measuring stick is a career path 99.95% of actors, PERIOD, have never even closely approximated.
 

Matt_

World's #1 One Direction Fan: Everyone else in the room can see it, everyone else but you~~~
Yeah and the trailer barely had any plot. It was basically a showcase of her acting the entire time. My friends and I saw the trailer before spotlight and everyone was asking "what the fuck is that movie even about?"

Yeah they played the trailer before TFA and my friend had the same reaction
I'm gonna watch it purely for Lawrence
 

Anth0ny

Member
I'm surprised they haven't brought back Lion King in the form of Frozen-esque CG animation.

Their strategy seems to be:

1. Revive classic animated films in live action (Cinderella, Maleficent, Beauty and the Beast, Jungle Book)

2. Completely new IP for their CG animation (Tangled, Frozen, Big Hero 6, Wreck it Ralph)

3. RIP in peace hand-drawn animation
 

harSon

Banned
Not only is trying to compare every Star Wars actor's success to Harrison Ford's sorta unfair in terms of Star Wars, but in terms of acting in general. Dude was pretty much the single biggest movie star in Hollywood - TWICE.



Two of them did, and those two didn't seem to be exclusively pursuing that as their primary career path anyway.

Boyega and Ridley are likely going to get to do whatever the fuck they want for awhile, like McGregor did. He didn't "fail" at scoring whatever picture he wanted (and doing well in those pictures) he basically took the financial security as an opportunity to actually pursue all the shit he wanted to do. So did Fisher, really.

Ridley definitely will. But I don't have any confidence that Boyega will. Black actors/actresses simply don't have the same trajectory in Hollywood that their white counterparts do. Compare Lupita Nyong'o's career to Margot Robbie and Alicia Vikander.
 
I'm surprised they haven't brought back Lion King in the form of Frozen-esque CG animation.

Their strategy seems to be:

1. Revive classic animated films in live action (Cinderella, Maleficent, Beauty and the Beast, Jungle Book)

2. Completely new IP for their CG animation (Tangled, Frozen, Big Hero 6, Wreck it Ralph)

3. RIP in peace hand-drawn animation
;_; Hand-drawn animation is my favourite.

I really hope that they manage to pull off the live action Beauty and the Beast movie.
 
I'm surprised they haven't brought back Lion King in the form of Frozen-esque CG animation.

Their strategy seems to be:

1. Revive classic animated films in live action (Cinderella, Maleficent, Beauty and the Beast, Jungle Book)

2. Completely new IP for their CG animation (Tangled, Frozen, Big Hero 6, Wreck it Ralph)

3. RIP in peace hand-drawn animation
Longlivetheking.gif
 

Boke1879

Member
Eh. Daisy and John will be fine after these movies. They seem to have a good head on their shoulders and seem to have a natural charisma in interviews.

Sure these may be the movies they are most remembered for and they probably won't be top tier actors but who cares.

This is a good starting block and there is plenty of work in the field for them. Television, voice acting, etc.
 

Anth0ny

Member
A CG Aladdin or Lion King by the Frozen team would be fucking sweet


and probably look lame af in live action. please don't try to bring that shit back in live action.
 
Ridley definitely will. But I don't have any confidence that Boyega will.

Boyega's on some mid-90s Will Smith shit right now. Finn is very reminiscent of Mike Lowry/Capt. Hiller/J type shit.

But you've been pretty consistent on maintaining a "sky is falling" tone regarding Boyega & Finn for like the past 8 months now. Not saying there isn't any reason for it, of course there is (anyone paying attention to Hollywood history knows that) but the idea that Boyega isn't basically winning pretty much everyone over right about now, both with his performance in the film AND on the press tour, seems to be a very small one.
 

WillyFive

Member
I'm surprised they haven't brought back Lion King in the form of Frozen-esque CG animation.

Their strategy seems to be:

1. Revive classic animated films in live action (Cinderella, Maleficent, Beauty and the Beast, Jungle Book)

2. Completely new IP for their CG animation (Tangled, Frozen, Big Hero 6, Wreck it Ralph)

3. RIP in peace hand-drawn animation

#2 has always been the case outside of one exception (Rescuers Down Under in 1990).

And #3 is still happening on TV, Disney is producing a whole bunch of them. The new Lion Guard TV show looks absolutely stunning for a TV show.
 

border

Member
Not only is trying to compare every Star Wars actor's success to Harrison Ford's sorta unfair in terms of Star Wars, but in terms of acting in general. Dude was pretty much the single biggest movie star in Hollywood - TWICE.

Basically, your whole point is pretty silly. Like there's only one possible career path out of Star Wars and if you don't track with it, you somehow fucked it up. Especially when the career path you're using as a measuring stick is a career path 99.95% of actors, PERIOD, have never even closely approximated.

I've singled Ford out as an exception, not really a comparison. Drew Barrymore was only a child in what was at the time the second highest grossing film of all time, and even her career trajectory ended up better than Hamill, Christensen, and others who were in a better position to strike while the iron was hot.

If Boyega and Ridley wanna be Kate Winslet they can probably be Kate Winslet. But not Leonardo DiCaprio.....that's really all I'm saying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom