Batman always wins.Yeah, I also expected it to top TDKR domestically. Now it seems like it'll end at ~$420M at most.
Yeah, I also expected it to top TDKR domestically. Now it seems like it'll end at ~$420M at most.
Between this, Pacific Rim and World War Z it's going to be a bloodbath this summer.
nah, unbreakable was cool
Don't say that. Pacific Rim will hopefully be a moderate to good success. I certainly know infinitely more people interested in that than After Earth and World War Z.
That's his birthday wish. To be legally separated from his parents.
why do people keep letting M. Night direct movies
all of them bomb, none of them make their money back why are studios so interested in throwing away money on this guy
He might not be. What are younger audiences going to know him from? His films generally have a short shelf life. Nobody's going back to much of his filmography, even though stuff like Hitch or Men in Black was successful at one time.
This will never get old. He has this look on his face every time he shows up on the AE trailer. It's amazing. Is it a tick he can't control or does he think it makes him look badass?
Now You See Me was very entertaining, I quite enjoyed it.
Same. Mark Ruffalo carried the movie well. The story was also nice.
Will and Jaden will be okay. Hollywood has already been very apprehensive about giving M. Night another big movie. I could see him having to sit out for a couple years.
The After Earth promotional images don't even use his name on them. And considering he used to be a household name, that means they realized that he wasn't a draw for people anymore.
So the director isn't a big draw to excite people AND his skills aren't seen as competent anymore. There is honestly no reason to hire him over anyone else. I'd rather give some first timer the keys and hope for the next big thing. We pretty much know what we're going to get out of M. Night at this point.
why do people keep letting M. Night direct movies
all of them bomb, none of them make their money back why are studios so interested in throwing away money on this guy
Infection causing an outbreak that leads things to attack others= zombies in reality land.I don't think 28 Days Later has zombies in it myself (it shares the same company with The Crazies), so no, I Am Legend does not have zombies.
STiD's performance is oh so disappointing and 100% Paramount + Abrams' fault.
I remember saying a few years ago (when June 2012 was announced as the release date) that they were making a *huge* mistake. I mean, here you had ST2009 come out of nowhere and completely reinvigorate the franchise and gain interest from the masses for the first time. Hollywood 101: you strike when the iron is hot. STiD should have been in production and released before 2012. Instead, they did the absolute worst thing they could do by announcing a date 3 years off and then delaying it a whole year from that. Way to kill all the hype dead in the tracks that you built up from the first film, Paramount.
Abram's fault is his usual problem - forcing such a level of secrecy on plot details that no one outside of people who were going to see the film anyways would be attracted to it from seeing the trailers.
World War Z could have been a moderate success or a barely break even movie if the marketing wasn't awful. But right now trailers have failed to show anything exciting, what the threat is and barely explain the premise. Those kind of trailer (John Carter and Star Trek Into Darkness had the same kind of shitty marketing) usually don't lead to massive success.
People actually saw "Now you see me"? Thing seems like something the studios sat on for years because they didn't know when to release it so that didn't bomb superhard.
This will never get old. He has this look on his face every time he shows up on the AE trailer. It's amazing. Is it a tick he can't control or does he think it makes him look badass?
hello
like hello
my name is jaden
and i'm a young fellow
STiD's performance is oh so disappointing and 100% Paramount + Abrams' fault.
I remember saying a few years ago (when June 2012 was announced as the release date) that they were making a *huge* mistake. I mean, here you had ST2009 come out of nowhere and completely reinvigorate the franchise and gain interest from the masses for the first time. Hollywood 101: you strike when the iron is hot. STiD should have been in production and released before 2012. Instead, they did the absolute worst thing they could do by announcing a date 3 years off and then delaying it a whole year from that. Way to kill all the hype dead in the tracks that you built up from the first film, Paramount.
Abram's fault is his usual problem - forcing such a level of secrecy on plot details that no one outside of people who were going to see the film anyways would be attracted to it from seeing the trailers.
Big bomb in After Earth (as expected). Has Will killed his son's career? We'll see.
So what are the chances we'll see another Star Trek movie?
So what are the chances we'll see another Star Trek movie?
So what are the chances we'll see another Star Trek movie?
How the newest Star Trek was done makes me very worried for the next Star Wars movies.
Be high irony if they end up making people like the prequels in comparison if the new movies are terrible.
Curious, would you say that the original marketing for StarTrek 09 was different than the one we saw for Into Darkness?
So the Hangover 3 made $82M overseas this weekend. Current global total is now $199M.