Aquamarine
Member
.
You can't take box office gross, substract the production budget and say it's net profit. Movie studios only get a fraction of the actual gross.
As expected, horrible comedy sequel gets saved by international audiences :/
As expected, horrible comedy sequel gets saved by international audiences :/
Well that was stupid of me.
Brad Pitt's not really a proven box office draw though. He's famous but it's been many many years since he's been in a big budget movie and expected to draw the audiences in.
Don't say that. Pacific Rim will hopefully be a moderate to good success. I certainly know infinitely more people interested in that than After Earth and World War Z.
Yea Pacific Rim has great hype, as does Man of Steel.
Great hype where? Outside of nerd circles I haven't seen anything regarding Pacific Rim. I have yet to see one trailer even for it in a theater showing or even posters. It almost feels like it has zero marketing so far. Man of Steel in comparison I see plastered everywhere
Pacific Rim opens a month after Man of Steel. Nerd circles are usually a great indicator of success(excluding Scott Pilgrim).
lol this has been proven wrong so often.
There's a trailer of Pacific Rim before FF6Great hype where? Outside of nerd circles I haven't seen anything regarding Pacific Rim. I have yet to see one trailer even for it in a theater showing or even posters. It almost feels like it has zero marketing so far. Man of Steel in comparison I see plastered everywhere
Pacific Rim opens a month after Man of Steel. Nerd circles are usually a great indicator of success(excluding Scott Pilgrim).
If Pacific Rim bombs then then it seems like non franchise science fiction is over... If it is successful than it will show that good ideas can work.
District 9 was more than successful because it was a good idea with a reasonable budget.
according to boxofficemojo, studios get ±55% of the domestic gross, and the percentage for the international gross is lower than that (±40% or something?).
If Pacific Rim bombs then then it seems like non franchise science fiction is over... If it is successful than it will show that good ideas can work.
District 9 was more than successful because it was a good idea with a reasonable budget.
Where is that from? I've seen you mention that a couple of times.
The "Fanboy ceiling" is basically 30mil, domestic. That's the amount of money studios can rely on if their movie appeals SOLELY to the core.
Projects are typically greenlit because studios are convinced by the producers that there WILL be crossover, it just needs their money to provide the proper push to break the property out of the niche it currently holds.
Sometimes that push doesn't work, and then the movies are left to live and die by the core that already appreciates them. Scott Pilgrim is a great example. That thing made about $30 million.
2005: Serenity (25 million)
2006: Snakes on a Plane (35 million)
2007: Grindhouse (25 million)
2008: The Spirit (39 million)
2009: Speed Racer (43 million)
2010: Scott Pilgrim (31 million)
Catering to the core is good for creating "buzz" but that only goes so far. Legitimate anticipation has to created by the marketing departments, and it has to be aimed at people who aren't already on-board.
Will Pacific Rim do that? I don't know. But so far, WB seems to be nailing the Man of Steel marketing. Del Toro's gotta be hoping the same weight and strategy will apply to his film as well.
Would have been tough for District 9 to bomb. $30 million budget.
tbf it probably sucks having a dad who's the coolest guy on earth and you can't pass for a poor imitation.
District 9 also had a marketing campaign that was in full gear months ahead of release. PR seems to have none yet and is not to far out.
Great hype where? Outside of nerd circles I haven't seen anything regarding Pacific Rim. I have yet to see one trailer even for it in a theater showing or even posters. It almost feels like it has zero marketing so far. Man of Steel in comparison I see plastered everywhere
Lots of movies bomb on $30M budgets.
D9 also only cost $30 mill.
Honestly i don´t understand the hype for this. It looks so much like transformers.There was a trailer for it with After Earth. For whatever that's worth.
People who think that World War Z is going to be some humungous bomb just sound like bitter fans of the book who are angry that the movie isn't what they wanted. Will it be a raging success? No idea... but I'd feel pretty comfortable thinking it won't have trouble making its money back. The gnashing of teeth on the internet isn't indicative of how successful it'll be. The comparisons to John Carter are especially laughable.
Wow. 12% RT and $27 million opening weekend? What happened to Will Smith.
no better than Rebecca Black's "Friday" video. It's a bought-and-paid-for vanity piece for a spoiled teenager
Wow. 12% RT and $27 million opening weekend? What happened to Will Smith.
People who think that World War Z is going to be some humungous bomb just sound like bitter fans of the book who are angry that the movie isn't what they wanted. Will it be a raging success? No idea... but I'd feel pretty comfortable thinking it won't have trouble making its money back. The gnashing of teeth on the internet isn't indicative of how successful it'll be. The comparisons to John Carter are especially laughable.
There´s Bad Boys 3 in the film listing but not sure if it´s true and when it will start filming.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000226/
Give me Bad Boys 3 dammit.
The "Fanboy ceiling" is basically 30mil, domestic. That's the amount of money studios can rely on if their movie appeals SOLELY to the core.
Projects are typically greenlit because studios are convinced by the producers that there WILL be crossover, it just needs their money to provide the proper push to break the property out of the niche it currently holds.
Sometimes that push doesn't work, and then the movies are left to live and die by the core that already appreciates them. Scott Pilgrim is a great example. That thing made about $30 million.
2005: Serenity (25 million)
2006: Snakes on a Plane (35 million)
2007: Grindhouse (25 million)
2008: The Spirit (39 million)
2009: Speed Racer (43 million)
2010: Scott Pilgrim (31 million)
Catering to the core is good for creating "buzz" but that only goes so far. Legitimate anticipation has to created by the marketing departments, and it has to be aimed at people who aren't already on-board.
Will Pacific Rim do that? I don't know. But so far, WB seems to be nailing the Man of Steel marketing. Del Toro's gotta be hoping the same weight and strategy will apply to his film as well.