I'm shocked a jury could reach this verdict. This is utterly despicable and indefensible. Sessions is a truly laughable piece of shit.
oh lordHow obnoxious or disruptive was this laugh? Anybody have video or audio?
How obnoxious or disruptive was this laugh? Anybody have video or audio?
How obnoxious or disruptive was this laugh? Anybody have video or audio?
What's this from?
How obnoxious or disruptive was this laugh? Anybody have video or audio?
What's this from?
How obnoxious or disruptive was this laugh? Anybody have video or audio?
just asking questions huh
How obnoxious or disruptive was this laugh? Anybody have video or audio?
As obnoxious as folks who have their head in the sand.How obnoxious or disruptive was this laugh? Anybody have video or audio?
Ms. Gold, who was at the hearing, described the noise Ms. Fairooz made as a reflexive gasp that was no more loud than a cough. I would barely call it a laugh, she said.
If you're being serious, then you should know that any facts and reason literally won't matter to Trump or Republican apologists. People refer to this era as post-fact for a reason.To be fair, we all should be informed cause that's the first thing Trump/Republican apologists will latch to, and we can't shut it down if we don't know.
We've been setting remarkably bad precedents for nearly two years now. What's one more?Holy shit, isn't this a remarkably bad precedent to set?
The video is on Snopes, which I hope isn't too "FAKE NEWS" for you.
Ah. That provides some context.
http://www.snopes.com/woman-prosecuted-laughing-sessions/
That snopes video showed this isn't her first rodeo at disruptive protesting and being arrested for it.
I'd imagine these repeat offenders don't get plea deals.
12 months potential jail time is harsh but I can at least see the motivation behind it even if I don't think the punishment fits the crime.
This too. How the fuck was a jury okay with this shit?!
The world is going straight down the shitter real fast...
Fuck you Trump and the Republicans.
???????????????????????????????????
MeanwhileAh. That provides some context.
That snopes video showed this isn't her first rodeo at disruptive protesting and being arrested for it.
I'd imagine these repeat offenders don't get plea deals.
12 months potential jail time is harsh but I can at least see the motivation behind it even if I don't think the punishment fits the crime.
There is hope for the next generation.
College students shouldn't be sheltered from dissenting opinion.
College is where a person goes to get more dissenting opinions since hearing other opinions causes learning.
Ah. That provides some context.
http://www.snopes.com/woman-prosecuted-laughing-sessions/
That snopes video showed this isn't her first rodeo at disruptive protesting and being arrested for it.
I'd imagine these repeat offenders don't get plea deals.
12 months potential jail time is harsh but I can at least see the motivation behind it even if I don't think the punishment fits the crime.
Okay no offense but I think you forgot or misread some details.Ah. That provides some context.
http://www.snopes.com/woman-prosecuted-laughing-sessions/
That snopes video showed this isn't her first rodeo at disruptive protesting and being arrested for it.
I'd imagine these repeat offenders don't get plea deals.
12 months potential jail time is harsh but I can at least see the motivation behind it even if I don't think the punishment fits the crime.
She was given a plea deal and refused it.
It's right there in the OP, dude.
Okay no offense but I think you forgot or misread some details.
She wasn't convicted for laughing at the session, but forvactions done afterwards. Not saying it's okay, but the outrage alarm should go down one notch.
I'm pretty sure that jury went in thinking that she was guilty because of sufficient evidence of a cackle. Fuck those morons with a false sense of justice.I'm kind of more pissed off at the jury here. Like how did not a single one of them stand up and say "nah, this is fucked".
Colbert will face a firing squad with all the ruffles loaded.If one can get into legal trouble for laughing at anyone under the Trump administration you might as well just ship myself and millions of Americans off to the fucking electric chair.
Colbert will face a firing squad with all the ruffles loaded.
I misread that part. Thought her plea deal was rejected.
Why in the world would she reject their plea deal?
Ah. That provides some context.
http://www.snopes.com/woman-prosecuted-laughing-sessions/
That snopes video showed this isn't her first rodeo at disruptive protesting and being arrested for it.
I'd imagine these repeat offenders don't get plea deals.
12 months potential jail time is harsh but I can at least see the motivation behind it even if I don't think the punishment fits the crime.
I misread that part. Thought her plea deal was rejected.
Why in the world would she reject their plea deal?
She wasn't convicted for laughing at the session, but forvactions done afterwards. Not saying it's okay, but the outrage alarm should go down one notch.
I thought liberals were supposed to be the ones that are easily offended
What a fucking snowflake
Which is a perfect metaphor since he's super white and super fragile
I'm sure the staunch defenders of free speech in the Republican Party and conservative media will jump to this woman's defense.
Where are all those staunch "freedom of speech" folks from the Ann Coulter thread? Funny how they're silent all of a sudden
I misread that part. Thought her plea deal was rejected.
Why in the world would she reject their plea deal?