https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/05/08/why-did-trump-win-more-whites-and-fewer-blacks-than-normal-actually-voted/?utm_term=.bd3dcdfd412e
I had not seen this posted yet.
I would hope to encourage people to avoid having this being a pie fight over racial politics, because IMO the situation is far more complex than that:
My hot takes:
- there is a confluence of factors that determined the election, and no single cause was the determining factor:Russia, Comey, Racism, Hillary's unfavorables, poor campaign strategy, and voter suppression
- The idea that a white woman could double down on the Obama coalition may have been flawed. It is probably hard to generate the same enthusiasm as Barack Obama among PoCs as a white person (trump being so incredibly awful may help in 2018 and 2020.)
- A PoC that is "acceptable" to white people may be the strongest possible demographic candidate for the Democratic Party, but it may also be that the historic significance of Barack Obama can not be duplicated again in that way.
- This may point to the other evidence of her campaign being a shitshow. We know the ground game and campaigning was almost nonexistent in the "Firewall" and it shows here. The biggest declines were in Wisconsin and Michigan.
- All elections are turnout elections. On the margins you can have switchers but GOTV wins elections.
- this does not disprove racism as a factor, it just doesn't measure it evenly. Racism may account for some of the white turnout increase (as could other factors), racism also decreased black turnout with voter suppression, but I'm unaware of any estimates of how much of a factor it was.
- Comeys letter was probably still a factor, pushing these numbers one way or another
- overall, I think the answer is super complex about why. This tells you WHAT happened, but not WHY. IMO, in 2018 and beyond the party should focus on fundamentals. Have the right message for the different groups of voters. Talk to them a lot. Have a ground game explaining that message, get them to the polls on Election Day. It's not about identity politics or economic messaging, it's about having both and making sure the right people get the right message.
These national averages obscure important patterns. Heres what stands out: while the decline in black turnout was stark across the board, it was sharpest, on average, in the states that determined the outcome of the election. Black turnout fell by 4.3 percentage points in non-battleground states in 2016 compared to 2012. But it fell by 5.3 percentage points in states where the election was decided by a margin of less than 10 points.
I had not seen this posted yet.
I would hope to encourage people to avoid having this being a pie fight over racial politics, because IMO the situation is far more complex than that:
My hot takes:
- there is a confluence of factors that determined the election, and no single cause was the determining factor:Russia, Comey, Racism, Hillary's unfavorables, poor campaign strategy, and voter suppression
- The idea that a white woman could double down on the Obama coalition may have been flawed. It is probably hard to generate the same enthusiasm as Barack Obama among PoCs as a white person (trump being so incredibly awful may help in 2018 and 2020.)
- A PoC that is "acceptable" to white people may be the strongest possible demographic candidate for the Democratic Party, but it may also be that the historic significance of Barack Obama can not be duplicated again in that way.
- This may point to the other evidence of her campaign being a shitshow. We know the ground game and campaigning was almost nonexistent in the "Firewall" and it shows here. The biggest declines were in Wisconsin and Michigan.
- All elections are turnout elections. On the margins you can have switchers but GOTV wins elections.
- this does not disprove racism as a factor, it just doesn't measure it evenly. Racism may account for some of the white turnout increase (as could other factors), racism also decreased black turnout with voter suppression, but I'm unaware of any estimates of how much of a factor it was.
- Comeys letter was probably still a factor, pushing these numbers one way or another
- overall, I think the answer is super complex about why. This tells you WHAT happened, but not WHY. IMO, in 2018 and beyond the party should focus on fundamentals. Have the right message for the different groups of voters. Talk to them a lot. Have a ground game explaining that message, get them to the polls on Election Day. It's not about identity politics or economic messaging, it's about having both and making sure the right people get the right message.