WWDC 2013

Status
Not open for further replies.

SnakeXs

about the same metal capacity as a cucumber
I think it should be the reversed.

The iPad really shows how much wasted space there is in iOS.

On the iPhone you can argue that things are simpler for a smaller screen and mobile experience.

They probably want to nail the look and feel for iPhone, which is more cosmetic, and then take the extra time to translate the new look to take advantage of iPad's real estate.
 
please have some more widget options. i dont give a shit about stocks, id rather put something else in the notifications instead
 

navanman

Crown Prince of Custom Firmware
Sounds like they are also taking some ideas from the recent Google Play Store redesign where each media type has a different color associated with it.
Music=Orange, Apps=Green, etc..
 
Nah, Android is the imitator of iOS; Duarte stole a time machine and went into the future to copy Ive's flat design

Durate needs to hide in a cave until he fixed the godawful clock app. What a hidous piece of software.

They probably want to nail the look and feel for iPhone, which is more cosmetic, and then take the extra time to translate the new look to take advantage of iPad's real estate.

Yeah, but I don't want to wait 3 months for the iPad version.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
Can't find an iPad thread, so I'll ask here: are people expecting big updates with iPad or iPad mini? I'm looking to get my dad an iPad, and I'm thinking to let him have our iPad 2 and me get an iPad 4. But if people are expecting a big weight drop or something else I might try and hold off until an iPad 5.
 
Can't find an iPad thread, so I'll ask here: are people expecting big updates with iPad or iPad mini? I'm looking to get my dad an iPad, and I'm thinking to let him have our iPad 2 and me get an iPad 4. But if people are expecting a big weight drop or something else I might try and hold off until an iPad 5.

I would wait also.

They just lowered prices on some existing models. New iPad to match iPad Mini design is expected.
 

LCfiner

Member
I would wait also.

They just lowered prices on some existing models. New iPad to match iPad Mini design is expected.

not for this summer, though.

I honestly would not expect any iOS hardware updates at all. But, hey, since it's so close, if one can wait till the 10th to buy, it won't hurt to do so.
 

LCfiner

Member
Jony Ive’s new look for iOS 7: black, white, and flat all over http://t.co/j8PS6o07MJ

quick thought about the look of iOS from the link above and the WWDC invite graphic:

KcMzDQu.jpg

The link said that apple app icons would be mostly white and black with a signature color per app. The WWDC invite is white text on a dark background and has multiple colored app icons stacked behind it, suggesting perhaps, the same fundamental color scheme for individual apps.

not exactly a huge insight but I see a link there. To me, it supports the rumor.
 

mf.luder

Member
Sounds like they are also taking some ideas from the recent Google Play Store redesign where each media type has a different color associated with it.
Music=Orange, Apps=Green, etc..

Do you actually think they are taking this idea from the Play Store? I'd be willing to bet Jony has had these ideas sketched out over the years of
for
stalled UI development.
 

mrkgoo

Member
quick thought about the look of iOS from the link above and the WWDC invite graphic:



The link said that apple app icons would be mostly white and black with a signature color per app. The WWDC invite is white text on a dark background and has multiple colored app icons stacked behind it, suggesting perhaps, the same fundamental color scheme for individual apps.

not exactly a huge insight but I see a link there. To me, it supports the rumor.

Nice spotting.

As much as I think the current textured apps look kinda gaudy, I will admit there's at least character. I know when I'm in game centre vs anything else. I mean, how would you really distinguish any apps that are just lists if items, especially if you don't have a header bar? I guess unique colour might do it.

Anyway, if all sounds snazzy.
 

gamma

Member
Here's hoping that Apple finally arrived in the 21st century and starts streaming the keynote again. Everyone from Google to Microsoft and Sony does it, some even broadcast on TV.
 
No dude, the interface is so much nicer to navigate. It no longer feels like we're in 2001 running Cheetah.
I agree that the Cheetah interface was outdated, but they could have at least made it feel more OSX-like rather than more iOS-like.
Also they don't appear to have opened it up at all, so it looks like OpenRadar will still be necessary to see what bugs other people are posting...
 

giga

Member
I agree that the Cheetah interface was outdated, but they could have at least made it feel more OSX-like rather than more iOS-like.
Also they don't appear to have opened it up at all, so it looks like OpenRadar will still be necessary to see what bugs other people are posting...
Yeah, that's still my biggest issue. But I'm just happy they did anything at all with radar.
 
You know, it would be completely an Apple move to include only the Intel Iris Pro GTe HD 5200 GPU in the new 15" Retina MacBook Pros and completely forgo dedicated graphics.
 

giga

Member
You know, it would be completely an Apple move to include only the Intel Iris Pro GTe HD 5200 GPU in the new 15" Retina MacBook Pros and completely forgo dedicated graphics.
I would be fine with that since it would come with significant battery and heat improvements in high performance situations. Almost-650M like performance at 45W (instead of 90W) is fine by me.
 

numble

Member
I would be fine with that since it would come with significant battery and heat improvements in high performance situations. Almost-650M like performance at 45W (instead of 90W) is fine by me.
Which hypothetical Haswell configuration do you think will be the one to get?
 

giga

Member
Which hypothetical Haswell configuration do you think will be the one to get?

The ones with the Iris Pro 5200.

nyzR+


Here’s where things get interesting, the mobile H-Series processors. CPU clocks are down slightly relative to the above M-series, and all of these are 6MB L3 cache parts. To make up for that, Intel has equipped the top three HQ parts with their Iris Pro 5200 iGPU. While having faster integrated graphics may not really matter much on a desktop if you have a discrete GPU, on notebooks we generally always like having the faster iGPU available—you don’t always need a full discrete GPU for some tasks, but the cut-down GT1 of the previous generation sometimes fell short. Heat and noise are also more of a concern with notebooks, so running off the iGPU whenever possible is generally a good thing.

Intel has targeted roughly the level of performance offered by NVIDIA’s GT 650M with their Iris Pro 5200 graphics, or roughly a two-fold increase in performance over HD 4000, and that should be enough for everything short of high-quality, high-resolution gaming. What’s even more interesting is that there’s the potential for a reasonable gaming experience with the CPU and iGPU combined still drawing less than 47W of power; GT 650M may still be a better gaming chip, but the combined CPU + dGPU power draw is quite a bit higher than 47W. Of course, even on a 90Wh battery a load of 45W means you’d still get less than two hours of battery life. We’ll see about testing this as soon as we get more time with the hardware.

http://anandtech.com/show/7002/hit-the-road-jack-intels-mobile-quadcore-haswell-skus
 
I would be fine with that since it would come with significant battery and heat improvements in high performance situations. Almost-650M like performance at 45W (instead of 90W) is fine by me.

If Adobe is can add Mercury Playback Engine support, I might be on board. All the same, having less than 1GB of VRAM is going to hinder any pro app work, I would think.
 

muddream

Banned
I would be fine with that since it would come with significant battery and heat improvements in high performance situations. Almost-650M like performance at 45W (instead of 90W) is fine by me.

The 650M in the 15" is overclocked with 1GB instead of 512MB of memory, it's noticeably faster than a stock 650M, which in turn will be noticeably faster faster than the Iris Pro 5200, especially in applications that make use of Nvidia's drivers. That's a pretty big drop in performance for your flagship product, I don't see Apple doing it this year...it's not like anyone's demanding better battery life.
 

giga

Member
The 650M in the 15" is overclocked with 1GB instead of 512MB of memory, it's noticeably faster than a stock 650M, which in turn will be noticeably faster faster than the Iris Pro 5200, especially in applications that make use of Nvidia's drivers. That's a pretty big drop in performance for your flagship product, I don't see Apple doing it this year...it's not like anyone's demanding better battery life.
The anandtech review compared the rMBP 650M to the Iris Pro 5200. The former fared better in the gaming benchmarks and the latter in the synthetics.

http://anandtech.com/print/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested

I think Anand's conclusion is spot on:

Where Iris Pro is dangerous is when you take into account form factor and power consumption. The GT 650M is a 45W TDP part, pair that with a 35 - 47W CPU and an OEM either has to accept throttling or design a cooling system that can deal with both. Iris Pro on the other hand has its TDP shared by the rest of the 47W Haswell part. From speaking with OEMs, Iris Pro seems to offer substantial power savings in light usage (read: non-gaming) scenarios. In our 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display review we found that simply having the discrete GPU enabled could reduce web browsing battery life by ~25%. Presumably that delta would disappear with the use of Iris Pro instead.

Lower thermal requirements can also enabler smaller cooling solutions, leading to lighter notebooks. While Iris Pro isn't the fastest GPU on the block, it is significantly faster than any other integrated solution and does get within striking distance of the GT 650M in many cases. Combine that with the fact that you get all of this in a thermal package that a mainstream discrete GPU can't fit into and this all of the sudden becomes a more difficult decision for an OEM to make.

Without a doubt, gaming focused notebooks will have to stick with discrete GPUs - but what about notebooks like the 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display? I have a dedicated PC for gaming, I use the rMBP for work and just need a GPU that's good enough to drive everything else in OS X. Intel's HD 4000 comes close, and I suspect Iris Pro will completely negate the need for a discrete GPU for non-gaming use in OS X. Iris Pro should also be competent enough to make modern gaming possible on the platform as well. Just because it's not as fast as a discrete GPU doesn't mean that it's not a very good integrated graphics solution. And all of this should come at a much lower power/thermal profile compared to the current IVB + GT 650M combination.

It wouldn't be the first time Apple opted for battery and thermals over raw performance in their notebook lineup. See: 320M -> HD 3000 in the 13" MBP.
 

Blackhead

Redarse
The anandtech review compared the rMBP 650M to the Iris Pro 5200. The former fared better in the gaming benchmarks and the latter in the synthetics.

http://anandtech.com/print/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested

I think Anand's conclusion is spot on:



It wouldn't be the first time Apple opted for battery and thermals over raw performance in their notebook lineup. See: 320M -> HD 3000 in the 13" MBP.

He's a journalist though. His 'work' could already be done on a Macbook Air. When Apple unveiled the MBP with retina display they showcased it with games and apps like the Adobe Creative Suite. Apple's discontinued the 17" MBP and the 15" MBPr is their top of the line laptop now. "Good enough" doesn't cut it for many in the user demographic of the MBPr.

I guess Apple could remove the discrete GPU in the entry level model of the next 15" MBPr. But discarding the option entirely? No need.
 

muddream

Banned
Yeah, but the 13" MPB wasn't their performance flagship, it was their college/starbucks laptop. Intel still have work to do on the driver side (one of the reasons Apple ditched AMD) and the gap would be bigger with Haswell & 750M instead of IB & 650M. Discrete graphics are definitely on their way out for Apple, but I don't see it happening this cycle.
 

giga

Member
Maybe not this cycle, but it's inevitable. And the way they've treated the Mac Pro is another reason why it wouldn't surprise me if they opted for just the Iris Pro this cycle.
 

Blackhead

Redarse
Maybe not this cycle, but it's inevitable. And the way they've treated the Mac Pro is another reason why it wouldn't surprise me if they opted for just the Iris Pro this cycle.
Yeah Pro Mac users have low expectations these days. There aren't even any interesting rumors any more. MBA with LTE? Fingerprint sensors on the rMBP (to replace the removed security locks)? Nope, only spec bumps...

Wait for Skylake.
Ok that got me; I laughed
 
Yeah that's what I thought.

Pardon my earlier error as I pasted the link incorrectly even though Wikipedia redirects it to the right page.

I am hoping that Apple uses the good HQ processors as standard and not the ones with the HD 4600 graphics, specifically the 4702HQ and 4700HQ.
 
I guess Apple could remove the discrete GPU in the entry level model of the next 15" MBPr. But discarding the option entirely? No need.

Yup, and that is what I'm hoping for, as I think there would be market segment where an entry-level 15" MBPr with only an Iris Pro GPU would make sense.

Broadwell is going to be awesome. I hope to sell my current 2011 15" MBP for a 13" Retina MBP with an Iris Pro GPU and DDR4 in June next year.

You guys think we'll get a couple $100 off the Retina MBPs in price drops next week as the displays become cheaper and the non-Retina MBPs potentially get phased out?

Followup: Do you guys think this will be the refresh where the non-Retina MBPs are phased out, or do we have a couple more cycles of the old models sticking around?
Even slimmer? Damn.
I don't need slimmer, but lighter is always nicer. Apple's compromises for thinness can be irksome sometimes.
 

Blackhead

Redarse
Yup, and that is what I'm hoping for, as I think there would be market segment where an entry-level 15" MBPr with only an Iris Pro GPU would make sense.

Broadwell is going to be awesome. I hope to sell my current 2011 15" MBP for a 13" Retina MBP with an Iris Pro GPU and DDR4 in June next year.

You guys think we'll get a couple $100 off the Retina MBPs in price drops next week as the displays become cheaper and the non-Retina MBPs potentially get phased out?

Followup: Do you guys think this will be the refresh where the non-Retina MBPs are phased out, or do we have a couple more cycles of the old models sticking around?

I don't need slimmer, but lighter is always nicer. Apple's compromises for thinness can be irksome sometimes.

From the link above:
Kuo expects the older, non-Retina MacBook Pros to freeze and be taken out of the spotlight, much like the iPod Classic (or Mac Pro?). It would continue to be sold but with the current configurations Ivy Bridge and DVD burners and large hard drive options.
There's going to be some meltdowns if Apple discontinues the Mac Pro and freezes the models of the only user-upgradeable Macs left :/

Uh last year 'everyone' said Haswell was going to be awesome. That hasn't even arrived and the waiting for Broadwell has already begun. The CPU hypetrain never ends. Sandy Bridge has been good enough for my personal needs; I'd rather upgrade to 16GB of RAM than get a new processor. I assumed that by now I'd have the option for external graphics cards via thunderbolt connectors but still relying on Apple and using integrated graphics...
 

muddream

Banned
The link is misleading, but who gives a shit about the 0.04 inches that separate the two.

The Iris Pro GPU costs as much as the faster Nvidia graphics, doesn't make sense as an entry option.

I could see the 15" getting phased out this cycle, but I believe too many dullards are still buying the regular 13" MPB...those people don't understand specs anyway, so it makes sense to freeze them.

My modest expectations:
1) IPS-Panels for the Airs, because buying a TN panel in the year 2013 makes you look like a real piece of shit in front of strangers & friends alike.
2) Iris Pro GPU turns the 13" rMPB into the greatest Notebook of all time, stock price skyrockets.
3) Holograms of Steve & Tupac appear on stage to call whoever let the Mac Pro & Thunderbolt display turn into a mockery of Apple's image a "punk bitch".
 

giga

Member
I don't see the Iris Pro going in the 13" model. 47W TDP is too much. It'll be a 35W chip, thus the HD 4600.
 
Uh last year 'everyone' said Haswell was going to be awesome. That hasn't even arrived and the waiting for Broadwell has already begun. The CPU hypetrain never ends. Sandy Bridge has been good enough for my personal needs; I'd rather upgrade to 16GB of RAM than get a new processor. I assumed that by now I'd have the option for external graphics cards via thunderbolt connectors but still relying on Apple and using integrated graphics...

And it is awesome, as was Ivy, as was Sandy, IMO. It's just for me that Broadwell is the generation where it's going to finally make sense for me to upgrade from my current 15" Sandy Bridge MBP with a 6490M.

If you want that gpu, yes. I'll never get a 15" one though--too big and heavy for me.

Well, if the new models are going to be thinner and lighter...

HD4600 isn't going to be bad, though everyday performance is going to probably be appreciably smoother on the models with the Iris Pro.
 

numble

Member
And it is awesome, as was Ivy, as was Sandy, IMO. It's just for me that Broadwell is the generation where it's going to finally make sense for me to upgrade from my current 15" Sandy Bridge MBP with a 6490M.



Well, if the new models are going to be thinner and lighter...

HD4600 isn't going to be bad, though everyday performance is going to probably be appreciably smoother on the models with the Iris Pro.
I don't know why you'd go for Broadwell and not just wait for Skylake. The tocks are bigger than the ticks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom