WWE Summerslam 2014 |OT| Blood. Urine. Vomit. For only $9.99/Month

Status
Not open for further replies.
If they decide to end Orton's jobber streak, I'd like to see him vs Brock.

If they start building Rusev as a potential credible main eventer I'd love to Rusev/Brock, but it's waaaay too early for that.

Bryan vs Brock would kill.

My dream booking would be Bray/Lesnar with Bray going over clean. If Bray were to win clean at SS or TLC or something and hold the belt 'till Mania I could even accept him dropping it to Reigns.

lol like anyone thinks Bray's fat ass could beat Lesnar.

He lost to Jericho for fuck's sake.

They really botched Bray, he's just floundering around with no purpose.
 
I also don't think you can give this rub to Bryan; they basically used their two biggest cards on Lesnar - the Streak and making their 10 years of lolCenaWins / SuperCena into a jobber. Bryan has 2-4 years left, at most (being 33) of a full time wrestler. That's a really short sighted move to please some internet smarks. But if Bryan got dominated? Then you'd see genuine confusion and genuine fear and genuine anger towards Lesnar from the crowd. The only way for Lesnar to get genuine heat from the crowd is to run down Punk and destroy Bryan.

I don't know if Reigns is ready, and I'm pretty sure the smarks are going to crap all over Reigns regardless of what he does, as long as he has the perception of being the "chosen one.". But I am pretty sure you don't give that win to Bryan.
 
Bray's just a fat corny guy. Are you folks being serious? You want that man in sweatpants vs Brock Lesnar?

Bray is an awesome athlete, an awesome character and the best promo in the WWE (not counting Heyman).

I'd like to see it eventually, but he's kind of spinning his heels here. Needs a fresh angle. I could actually see them returning to Bryan/Wyatt for Wrestlemania 31 because that feud was cut short and their match is still, IMO, the best singles match of the year.
 
I think at the end of the day, they're going to go with Reigns whether the smarks like it or not.

They could potentially try to build a completely new guy, but who knows if they're willing to put over someone like Kenta or Devitt with Lesnar...both seem unrealistic.
 
Eddie Guerrero was shorter and a few pounds heavier than Daniel Bryan.
7 years have already passed: repeat NWO2004 but at wrestlemania and use Reigns instead of Goldberg.

Eddie_Guerrero.jpeg
vs
daniel-bryan-summerslam-wwe-total-divas.jpg


I love D.Bry but from a wrestling physique and in ring presence, current day D.Bry isn't close. Dood needs a full blown gimmick change.
 
Except unless you want to say that Bryan is heads and tails above the Undertaker and Cena, you pretty much have to have Lesnar kick Bryan's ass for 20 minutes straight and then pin him. There's no credibility to Bryan beating Lesnar after 'Taker loses at WM and Cena gets squashed for 15 minutes straight.

I mean, if they want to bring back the unpredictability aspect, they need to bring back Punk at RR, and Punk get destroyed. Bryan wins RR, faces Lesnar at WM...and gets destroyed. If whoever faces Lesnar at WM gets dominated, then you'll start to make things actually unpredictable.

EDIT: Also, with the way Lesnar throws people around, I would not let Bryan anywhere near him. Neck injuries + Lesnar's move set = noooooooo way.

In WWE "canon", Lesnar destroying Cena ranks him so far off the charts that you have to break consistency eventually or he keeps the belts forever. It's not a question of whether it's believable for Bryan to beat him because right now no one is believable. Whoever they build up won't make total "sense", so it's no worse for Bryan than anyone else.
 
DDP and Batista say what

Bryan could probably wrestle to mid 40's and be fine.

Bryan's been wrestling for over 15 years already, he started in 1999. Even Cena has less mileage on him than Bryan.

It's not about the age, it's about the mileage. Also, Bryan's in-ring style is based on speed and mat wrestling, not power. (EDIT) The speed part is not likely to age super gracefully, and his recent WWE rise has not been very heavy on mat wrestling.
 
See, I keep hearing this from internet wrestling fans, but I've never seen numbers. If it's true, it will be interesting to see if it holds up. With today's wrestling market, I just don't see it.
It's nonsense. Lesnar basically got them an increase in 2012 on the two PPVs he wrestled on against Cena and Triple H (WWE's two biggest stars), but even then, those numbers aren't anywhere near as good as what they were doing even 7 years ago. He's basically been mostly useless since then. When Brotista does a bigger viewership number than you ever have on his return when he's been absent for 4 years and looking like a Teletubby, you're not some huge star.

The Rock is the only legit dude they have who has moved things. Lesnar is just another main eventer. His presence alone doesn't mean anything. It's what they do with him from a storyline perspective.
 
Bryan's been wrestling for over 15 years already, he started in 1999. Even Cena has less mileage on him than Bryan.

It's not about the age, it's about the mileage. Also, Bryan's in-ring style is based on speed and mat wrestling, not power. Not likely to age super gracefully.

Er, why would his mat wrestling fail? That's the one thing he can always fall back on even if he can't do the big dives anymore.
 
Bryan's been wrestling for over 15 years already, he started in 1999. Even Cena has less mileage on him than Bryan.

It's not about the age, it's about the mileage. Also, Bryan's in-ring style is based on speed and mat wrestling, not power. Not likely to age super gracefully.

...Mat wrestling is literally the one thing that will always work in a wrestler's career.
 
Er, why would his mat wrestling fail? That's the one thing he can always fall back on even if he can't do the big dives anymore.

Sorry, meant to clarify, the speed part would be the part that might not age gracefully. The mat wrestling would age well, but he hasn't been about mat wrestling in the WWE during his meteoric rise, and I think part of the reason the mainstream crowd has gotten behind him is that he is fast and does moves they don't normally see. Daniel Bryan the mat wrestler would probably be an upper mid-card guy.
 
Usually, you can attack a guy's weakness for kayfabe purposes. You can outquick most big guys. Or their fighting acumen was suspect. Brock's better at everything almost anyone you put in there with him in kayfabe AND in reality.

Stronger than almost everyone.
Faster than almost everyone.
Meaner than almost everyone.
A better fighter than everyone.

They just need to have Brock's diverticulitis return in the storyline or do a triple threat where he doesn't get pinned and then you can have Bryan or Reigns go over. I don't think any amount of sensible booking between now an WM31 makes any one person credible enough to beat Brock without shenanigans.
 
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...ssful-were-wwe-ppvs-over-the-last-year/page/2



And that 263,000 for ER is up almost 60,000 from 2011 which had 209,000 buys. ER 2013 dropped back to 231,000.

As the article states, it was Lesnar's first PPV in 8 years. That's my worry. Hey, Summerslam will get a great bump. But afterward? I don't know if it will sustain.

It's nonsense. Lesnar basically got them an increase in 2012 on the two PPVs he wrestled on against Cena and Triple H (WWE's two biggest stars), but even then, those numbers aren't anywhere near as good as what they were doing even 7 years ago. He's basically been mostly useless since then. When Brotista does a bigger viewership number than you ever have on his return when he's been absent for 4 years and looking like a Teletubby, you're not some huge star.

The Rock is the only legit dude they have who has moved things. Lesnar is just another main eventer. His presence alone doesn't mean anything. It's what they do with him from a storyline perspective.

This is more my line of thinking.
 
As the article states, it was Lesnar's first PPV in 8 years. That's my worry. Hey, Summerslam will get a great bump. But afterward? I don't know if it will sustain.

This is more my line of thinking.

Then maybe you try to convince Rock to go Rock vs Brock at WM 31?

How come I have this sinking feeling we might see the Fingerpoke of Doom tonight?
 
I think they could keep the belt on Lesnar until Mania. Just build the show around people trying to be (or not be) the Number 1 contender.

Feed Lesnar the Big Show, Orton and maybe even Mark Henry.

Just keep having Heyman on talking shit about everyone, and talk about how Lesnar doesn't even think enough the competition to show up until he's ready to destroy them.

It'll make his loss at Mania legendary and creates some more value to the belt. What's wrong with a guy holding it for half a year?

I'd also say they could try to push the Intercontinental Belt as the main event for a bit, but unfortunately I don't see a situation where they have Ziggler closing the show.

Odds are that we get more Steph/Bella fallout ending Raw tonight.
 
I think they could keep the belt on Lesnar until Mania. Just build the show around people trying to be (or not be) the Number 1 contender.

Feed Lesnar the Big Show, Orton and maybe even Mark Henry.

They already did this and squashed henry bad more then once.

Only way of remotely making him credible again is turning him heel and reopening the hall of pain, which'd take too long and lead to a heel v heel match anyway.
 
As the article states, it was Lesnar's first PPV in 8 years. That's my worry. Hey, Summerslam will get a great bump. But afterward? I don't know if it will sustain.



This is more my line of thinking.

The top billed match of the biggest PPV (Edit: WM28 ended up beating it out on a worldwide basis by a few thousand buys) WWE has ever done was Bobby Lashley vs Umaga. Even if Umaga wasn't dead, do you think running that back would result in even 100K buys today?

Times change. Lesnar coming back in 2012 was a big deal- The Rumble and Elimination Chamber were both down from the previous year, and while WrestleMania was up (Which happens when you go from Miz vs Cena in 2011 to Rock vs Cena in 2012), the fact that Extreme Rules did an increase from the prior year when stuff was going down shows he was a draw.
 
Eddie_Guerrero.jpeg
vs
daniel-bryan-summerslam-wwe-total-divas.jpg


I love D.Bry but from a wrestling physique and in ring presence, current day D.Bry isn't close. Dood needs a full blown gimmick change.

He also needs to not have a career-threatening injury that he wants to rush into surgery for so that he can rush back to competition. Yeah, that will end well.
 
Damn Steph looking good. I haven't watched WWE in a while, why is she and the others pictured throwing out the Four Horsemen sign?

Ronda Rousey was at SummerSlam with her friends who have dubbed themselves the Four Horsewomen; so she threw the Four Hoursemen sign to them.
 
He also needs to not have a career-threatening injury that he wants to rush into surgery for so that he can rush back to competition. Yeah, that will end well.

If he was rushing back he'd either have taken the second surgery as soon as it was proposed or have ignored the suggestion outright. That he's still waiting on whether he needs it or not suggests he's looking at the bigger picture.
 
The top billed match of the biggest PPV (Edit: WM28 ended up beating it out on a worldwide basis by a few thousand buys) WWE has ever done was Bobby Lashley vs Umaga. Even if Umaga wasn't dead, do you think running that back would result in even 100K buys today?

Times change. Lesnar coming back in 2012 was a big deal- The Rumble and Elimination Chamber were both down from the previous year, and while WrestleMania was up (Which happens when you go from Miz vs Cena in 2011 to Rock vs Cena in 2012), the fact that Extreme Rules did an increase from the prior year when stuff was going down shows he was a draw.

One example, and it wasn't a huge jump, plus it was a return. I just want to see it sustained. I don't think they have the current roster to do it.

Lesnar/Big Show? Dud. Lesnar/Orton? Boring. Lesnar/Henry? Blah.

Who wants to see any of that?

Do they do Lesnar/Cena again for three months?
 
Bryan's been wrestling for over 15 years already, he started in 1999. Even Cena has less mileage on him than Bryan.

It's not about the age, it's about the mileage. Also, Bryan's in-ring style is based on speed and mat wrestling, not power. (EDIT) The speed part is not likely to age super gracefully, and his recent WWE rise has not been very heavy on mat wrestling.

Cena and Bryan have been wresting for about the same number of years, they both started in late 1999, pretty sure Cena actually had his first match before Bryan had his. Only difference is that Cena didn't start wrestling with a high frequency until after he debuted in WWE in 2002 but regardless of the style Cena has at least just as much mileage on him as Bryan.
 
Ronda Rousey was at SummerSlam with her friends who have dubbed themselves the Four Horsewomen; so she threw the Four Hoursemen sign to them.

Ah I see. I'm actually interested in checking out SummerSlam now. Lesnar destroying Cena on a PPV sounds too good to be true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom