Xenoblade announced for New 3DS

Vita has a much higher resolution. Xenoblade was not playable on the Wii for me due to its already low resolution. Squishing it on to a 3DS screen now? No thanks.

Do we know for sure the New 3Ds doesn't have a higher resolution? DIdn't they mention being able to watch HD videos?
 
It's gonna be hilarious when unaware consumers buy 3DS Xenoblade and aren't be able to run it on their non-"New" handheld.

Nothing we haven't experienced before with literally every other new piece of hardware that borrowed the old hardware's branding, and even in some occasions where the two pieces of hardware had nothing to do with each other at all.
 
What about the hardware revision doesn't look good to you?

And with that new processor, it's closer to new hardware than most revisions, I think.
The new second stick look like ass and placed on a really strange place... I dunno if it'll be confortable.
The R2/L2 trigger too. It's the only solution to have these buttons with this thickness, but I think it doesn't look very confortable.

The rest of the improvements I don't really care, the 3D (which I never use anyway), amiibo (is that like Skylander? I don't think I'll ever buy these), the processing power should have been towards the OS only, not exclusive games.

Well, I'll just not support them.
 
What's the problem here?

If you wanted a Xenoblade remake for the Wii U, they've been working hard on XCX.

If you wanted to play the old Xenoblade on the Wii U you can.

They put a little bit of resources into porting it for the New 3DS. It opens up the game to a new audience and will drive more people to buy XCX.

Win all around!

If you don't want to play it on the 3DS go play it on a Wii or a Wii U. It's the same game.
 
No, your browser is not loading the gif, it's current speed.
kalddv.gif
 
No other company does this?

Who? Sony? What other companies are making portable gaming devices?

Look at the mobile phone arena, where portable gaming has largely moved, and you have yearly upgrades on flagship models.

Yes Sony too, but being portable wasn't the point, I more meant console wise in general. Imagine the rage if a "new X1" was announced with a little better specs and exclusive games.

And mobiles are different... You don't buy a phone to play games aimed for that phone in particular. Games aren't optimised to certain phones, (well iPhone perhaps, but earlier ones are seemingly ignored now). The beauty of consoles is you have fixed specs, so it can be optimised to the max, everyone has same experience, etc.
 
LMAO. Oh, Nintendo... yeah, because I'm totally buying a third 3DS revision just for one title. Get the fuck out of here.



This is screwing with the 2DS as well. If they actually gave a 3DS that removed the 3D gimmick with this new processor, maybe I'd trade in my five month old in bought years 2DS. But nope. I've got Dolphin to play Xenoblade, Nintendo. No thank you.

You don't want this hardware revision, but you'd be interested if they took a feature out? I don't follow. At any rate, someone in the Direct thread said (I believe) that Iwata said they already had teams working on gameS for the new hardware. Plural. I would be very surprised indeed if they stopped at just Xenoblade, though I doubt that it'll be the majority of their software that gets made N3DS exclusive.

The new second stick look like ass and placed on a really strange place... I dunno if it'll be confortable.
The R2/L2 trigger too. It's the only solution to have these buttons with this thickness, but I think it doesn't look very confortable.

The rest of the improvements I don't really care, the 3D (which I never use anyway), amiibo (is that like Skylander? I don't think I'll ever buy these), the processing power should have been towards the OS only, not exclusive games.

Well, I'll just not support them.

Fair complaints, thanks for telling me.
 
This is weird. A system called 3DS but it has games that don't work on "other" 3DSes.

This will cause grief for the uninitiated.
 
What's the problem here?

If you wanted a Xenoblade remake for the Wii U, they've been working hard on XCX.

If you wanted to play the old Xenoblade on the Wii U you can.

They put a little bit of resources into porting it for the New 3DS. It opens up the game to a new audience and will drive more people to buy XCX.

Win all around!

If you don't want to play it on the 3DS go play it on a Wii or a Wii U. It's the same game.

For me, the problem is not per se the Xenoblade port, but the precedent that is being created. How many other games will follow, that will not be able to run on the OG3DS because it's CPU is 5% (number out of ass) slower? Are people going to be forced to buy a new device for new games on basically the same hardware?
 
What's the problem here?

If you wanted a Xenoblade remake for the Wii U, they've been working hard on XCX.

If you wanted to play the old Xenoblade on the Wii U you can.

They put a little bit of resources into porting it for the New 3DS. It opens up the game to a new audience and will drive more people to buy XCX.

Win all around!

If you don't want to play it on the 3DS go play it on a Wii or a Wii U. It's the same game.

A new audience that has to buy another 3DS to be able to play the game, this is a very limiting new audience if that's the goal.
 
This is an easy title to show people how much more powerful the new hardware is. Nintendo's plan is to extend the 3DS generation for a few more years without a huge leap in hardware. So this is basically the first showcase title for 3DS 2.0.

That is just not gonna work.
 
For me, the problem is not per se the Xenoblade port, but the precedent that is being created. How many other games will follow, that will not be able to run on the OG3DS because it's CPU is 5% slower? Are people going to be forced to buy a new device for new games on basically the same hardware?
Yes and apparently you should shut up about it if you think thats bad. People keep talking about the dsi, but it's not like the dsi had many major releases. A Xenoblade portable is pretty major.
 
What's the problem here?

If you wanted a Xenoblade remake for the Wii U, they've been working hard on XCX.

If you wanted to play the old Xenoblade on the Wii U you can.

They put a little bit of resources into porting it for the New 3DS. It opens up the game to a new audience and will drive more people to buy XCX.

Win all around!

If you don't want to play it on the 3DS go play it on a Wii or a Wii U. It's the same game.

Xenoblade Wii is known for being extremely rare or expensive to get. A WiiU port will be less expensive for anyone who gets the game simply because they already have the console. If they don't have the console at least when they buy a WiiU they have immediate access to XCX when it comes out. A 3DS port that requires someone to buy an entirely new system just to play a game that has a sequel coming out on another system that they might also need to buy is pure stupidity.

They can open it up to a new audience as well by having it on the WiiU. Anyone who doesn't have a WiiU can quite easily buy a WiiU and also then have access to the upcoming sequel. Rather than this nonsensical method that essentially means that the person not only has to buy a new 3DS and Xenoblade 3DS but if they don't own a WiiU then they have to buy a WiiU and XCX as well if they want to play that.
 
This is weird. A system called 3DS but it has games that don't work on "other" 3DSes.

Well, the 3DS is a system called DS that has games don't work on "other" DS's. Gameboy Advance/Colour, likewise. If you're trying to draw attention to a dissonance between sharing a name, but not sharing games, then welcome to video game hardware, because every piece of it does this crap.
 
How can people defend Nintendo's shitty decision ?

It seems they can get away with anything ...

How can people defend any mobile phone developer and the fact that every single year a new revision comes out for said phone that has only slightly better specs? Because the money the masses still throw at them and their decision laughs at you and your "choice to not be like everyone else".
 
I bought a 3DS on launch day and replaced it with an XL the day it came out. It honestly kind of pisses me off that Nintendo wants me to buy a third iteration of their system just to play a new game (and I don't think this is comparable to DSiWare).

Thankfully this looks like crap and I already played Xenoblade on Wii, but it's a troubling precedent. Not cool, Nintendo.
 
No, your browser is not loading the gif, it's current speed.
kalddv.gif

That's unfortunate but expected. After all we're talking about a game that made the Wii sweat to run it, I seriously doubt the CPU boost puts the New 3DS on par with the Wii.

So, did anyone ever bitch about gold and silver being exclusive to Gameboy Color? I mean, that was a far bigger franchise as well

Only Crystal was exclusive to GBC. Gold and Silver could be played in a regular Game Boy with no missing features.
 
I just bought the Wii Version 4 days ago. But given that this version doesn't seem to improve much i'm ok with it. It's basically for a new audience
 
So, did anyone ever bitch about gold and silver being exclusive to Gameboy Color? I mean, that was a far bigger franchise as well

The thing is, the GBC came out years and years after the GB had been around... so it wasn't as much of a shock as these newer iterations. By that point a lot of people who had a Gameboy were ready to buy a new system, whereas many people weren't prepared for the onslaught of GBAs, DSs, and 3DSs/2DSs.
 
For me, the problem is not per se the Xenoblade port, but the precedent that is being created. How many other games will follow, that will not be able to run on the OG3DS because it's CPU is 5% (number out of ass) slower? Are people going to be forced to buy a new device for new games on basically the same hardware?

The reality is that many of the best games on the 3DS don't require this 'new' CPU. Fire Emblem... Luigi's Mansion... Kid Icarus... etc etc. There will only be a handful of games exclusive to the 'new' brand. Look at the DSi era.

If you're worried about the precedent or 'forcing' people to buy new hardware for new games, maybe Nintendo should never have upgraded the game boy.

A new audience that has to buy another 3DS to be able to play the game, this is a very limiting new audience if that's the goal.

It's still a new audience. If one was on the fence about upgrading or buying a 3DS for the first time, they would buy this revision and have the game available as one of their choices. As it's a 'launch' game, there's a very strong chance of them picking it up.

It's either that or not having the game at all, on any 3DS system. Why want something to not exist?

Xenoblade Wii is known for being extremely rare or expensive to get. A WiiU port will be less expensive for anyone who gets the game simply because they already have the console. If they don't have the console at least when they buy a WiiU they have immediate access to XCX when it comes out. A 3DS port that requires someone to buy an entirely new system just to play a game that has a sequel coming out on another system that they might also need to buy is pure stupidity.

They can open it up to a new audience as well by having it on the WiiU. Anyone who doesn't have a WiiU can quite easily buy a WiiU and also then have access to the upcoming sequel. Rather than this nonsensical method that essentially means that the person not only has to buy a new 3DS and Xenoblade 3DS but if they don't own a WiiU then they have to buy a WiiU and XCX as well if they want to play that.

Yes but a Wii U port doesn't exist. Complaining about a 3DS port because you wanted a Wii U port is ..... illogical. Maybe it's coming, who knows. But the 3DS version is here. Would you rather it not exist?

The fact is that this is a game that tests the 'new' 3DS' power, and hopefully will be able to drive extra hardware sales as well. If you wanted to play it on the 3DS.
 
I bought a 3DS on launch day and replaced it with an XL the day it came out. It honestly kind of pisses me off that Nintendo wants me to buy a third iteration of their system just to play a new game (and I don't think this is comparable to DSiWare).

Thankfully this looks like crap and I already played Xenoblade on Wii, but it's a troubling precedent. Not cool, Nintendo.

Not to mention the 2DS which can't even be 2 years old yet?
 
I just bought the Wii Version 4 days ago. But given that this version doesn't seem to improve much i'm ok with it. It's basically for a new audience

If the footage they showed was any indication, I don't think you need to worry much about missing out on any improvements at all. Rest assured in your home console version superiority.

The new 3DS gives me 32x vibes.

Or alternatively, it's the 3D-DD-S.
 
This is an easy title to show people how much more powerful the new hardware is. Nintendo's plan is to extend the 3DS generation for a few more years without a huge leap in hardware. So this is basically the first showcase title for 3DS 2.0.

Yeah, I agreed. I'm looking forward to pick up new 3DS but it made me wary about Smash 3DS Limited Bundle. I wouldn't buy it if it's NOT new 3DS.
 
Top Bottom