GamingIsDead
Member
When did hit markers become a thing in single player games? It needs to stop what ever the case is.
Yet, people going completely bonkers is understandable?
Yet, people going completely bonkers is understandable?
12 hours until even more awesomesauce is released all over our faces.
Graphics look great, but I was hoping for more than what seems to be a third person cover shooter
When did hit markers become a thing in single player games? It needs to stop what ever the case is.
He's not saying you can only draw positive ones. He's saying that you can only comment on the look of the game, because that's all you're able to reliably ascertain from these screenshots and gifs. What you're talking about re the "same information" stuff is if you make a comment that the game looks bad and someone else comments that the game looks great. That's fair enough. What isn't really reasonable is to take the "same information" - a few short gifs - and extrapolate whether the actual gameplay itself is going to be interesting, because you aren't equipped with anything close to the amount of knowledge required to make even the humblest of guesses. That's not the case with the visuals.
Because you can look at the footage and say it is beautiful.
That's a man.
BTW: 17 pages for this! What are guys going to do tomorrow?
Crash GAF
If it looks like Gears to them in 2-4 seconds, then it looks like Gears to them in 2-4 seconds. You will have a hard time convincing someone that something doesn't look like what they think it looks like, especially in a genre as homogenous as this one tends to be overall.Let's break this down to make it very simple:
Graphics/Art
- We see enough to know that at these moments (and those in previous media releases), it looks very impressive
- We don't see enough to know it looks very impressive all the time
Mechanics
- We see enough to know that there's familiar TPS gameplay mechanics
- We don't see enough to know what unique mechanics there are, but we've heard about some
you cant have objective beauty, sorry, and that is precisely what he was arguing.
I was just saying you could make a great shooter that people would like without having to resort to implementing cover.
But that would take a bunch of time and thought into creating the levels so you are right that those aren't priorities for developers in this day & age.
Yea, about the goddamn graphics, which you know - is discernible from the footage.
Want to point me to that 1 frame where it explains every single aspect of the gameplay, features and everything?
Bro if you're going to tell me Sin City Jessica Alba isn't beautiful you are drunker than John Daly.
It's almost as if embargoes are set for a reason.This looks like any of the other dozens of third person cover shooters from the previous gen, only with better graphics. I know, it's a 5 second gif and none of the others show much more gameplay wise besides QTEs and cinematics. But, if I were making videos/gifs to showcase a new game, I would not show a generic run to cover + pop and shoot.
you cant have objective beauty, sorry, and that is precisely what he was arguing.
more a fan of Rosario, and herein lies my point.
I can see the graphics are good, but I still haven't seen anything that has made me personally excited for the game. The hype surrounding this game even before 2 second snippets of gameplay were released was freaking insane, and it was all for the graphics? It's something I don't really understand.
I can see the graphics are good, but I still haven't seen anything that has made me personally excited for the game. The hype surrounding this game even before 2 second snippets of gameplay were released was freaking insane, and it was all for the graphics? It's something I don't really understand.
Oh come on....
Whether I'm hitting a player controlled character or and NPC, I like to know that I hit them, especially at distance. They serve a purpose in the absence of accurate animation or clear visual feedback such as torn clothes or blood.
No. You can say it is hideous if you want to. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The people that say the graphics are impressive are making that judgement based off of screenshots and gifs. People are making gameplay assumptions off 4 seconds of footage. I believe the press saw 20-40 minutes of gameplay. The GI and translated french magazine have already given greater detail on the gameplay. Some people are ignoring that and calling the game generic without enough information to support that claim.
I can see the graphics are good, but I still haven't seen anything that has made me personally excited for the game. The hype surrounding this game even before 2 second snippets of gameplay were released was freaking insane, and it was all for the graphics? It's something I don't really understand.
You guys need to calm the hype train down till tomorrow when we get a real trailer.
Don't worry codhand is doing that.
pray tell what type of assumption is being made here?
it's tough swimming upstream in splooge i'll admit
Graphics are huge parts of games what is hard to understand .
I'll never understand comments like this from about 2 seconds of clip.
I can see the graphics are good, but I still haven't seen anything that has made me personally excited for the game. The hype surrounding this game even before 2 second snippets of gameplay were released was freaking insane, and it was all for the graphics? It's something I don't really understand.
it's tough swimming upstream in splooge i'll admit
That he's excited overall? He didn't judge anything specifically.pray tell what type of assumption is being made here?
Ill never understand why people cream themselves from about two seconds of a clip.