Avengers: Age of Ultron |OT| If you open this thread, you're an Avenger

Status
Not open for further replies.
What's the point of debating who the "best" or "worst" MCU villain is when it's clear Marvel doesn't give a crap about developing good villains? They're just plot devices for whatever threat flavor a movie needs. It's super disappointing.
 
What's the point of debating who the "best" or "worst" MCU villain is when it's clear Marvel doesn't give a crap about developing good villains? They're just plot devices for whatever threat flavor a movie needs. It's super disappointing.
Kingpin was good, though.
 
After a fun start, found this thoroughly mediocre. The good parts are the little throwaway lines that Whedon does so well, being both funny and informing character, and the team has terrific chemistry. Scarlett Johansson is perfect. Elizabeth Olson makes a really strong first impression, even while being given little to do. James Spader's voice work gives Ultron far more personality and sadness than the script deserves. Robert Downey Jr, having been phoning in Stark for a while, gives one of his best performances since the first Iron Man now that he's having to fight a little bit for attention in such a big cast. Having Rhodes pop up was great.

The film starts out heading in an interesting direction, integrating its character work and its plot quite nicely, only to rapidly devolve into a rehash of Marvel's now stock 'big battle that trashes a city and/or generally causes immeasurable destruction' finale which is getting more tedious every time. Even worse is an interminable mid-section lull that goes on forever and emphasis Capital Letter Character Development, none of which has much to do with the movie at hand, all of which is clichéd in the most vomitously egregious way, and feels like Joss Whedon trying to remind the audience and himself that he can still write characters as well as quips and explodey set-pieces, even though he was doing it far more subtly only half an hour previously. All the romance stuff is DOA. Scarlett Witch does alright for the most part, but Quicksilver and Vision are entirely superfluous. Big chunks of the movie do the Iron Man 2 thing of existing solely for set-up rather than to service the plot of the movie you're watching. The final battle has a lot of time wasting, while Ultron's gigantic army from the trailer ("Best you've got") is defeated in less than thirty seconds and seemingly only exists to do another of those big rotating shots of the Avengers in mid-battle.

If you just want to see these characters quipping and fighting together in dramatic poses, you'll probably be happy enough, although I can't imagine anyone will be able to see this as anything but diminishing returns from the first one, which I really liked. I don't read superhero comics, so this is probably a much better movie if you've an emotional attachment to the material just for having these characters all together. I'd put it at a 5/10 for me and estimate a 7 for fans.
 
Felt like there was potential there, but there was absolutely no dramatic progression for the overall universe in this movie. For that reason it felt closest to the likes of Thor 2 or Ironman 2. There should have been a lot more meat in an Avengers movie. Nothing felt high stakes and the trope of Marvel super heroes battling some threat in the air as the final act is officially ridiculous. Is this all they can come up with?

As usual these days I love the first three quarters of the movie before the final act lets it down and the villain goes nowhere.

Marvel needs to be more inventive. The heroes don't always need to neatly win everything, leave some threads open to continue in the future.
 
What's the point of debating who the "best" or "worst" MCU villain is when it's clear Marvel doesn't give a crap about developing good villains? They're just plot devices for whatever threat flavor a movie needs. It's super disappointing.

Fisk was pretty good though, so there's that.

I agree, but he didn't become the Kingpin yet, probably in the next season of Daredevil.

of course he did. They just didn't literally "call" him "the kingpin" because it's super corny.
 
Gonna watch Age of Ultron in 1.5 hours. I'm a little bit excited but not much.

Just finished rewatching The Avengers 1, and it is actually much much much better than the first and second times I watched it.

But I hope the end battle of Age of Ultron is shorter than the Chitauri attack in The Avengers, because that dragged out a bit.
 
What's the point of debating who the "best" or "worst" MCU villain is when it's clear Marvel doesn't give a crap about developing good villains? They're just plot devices for whatever threat flavor a movie needs. It's super disappointing.

Loki in the first Thor actually was a good villain.
 
of course he did. They just didn't literally "call" him "the kingpin" because it's super corny.

I don't think so, I mean I don't know a lot about the Kingpin, but in the series it was as much his origin story as Daredevil's and he isn't like that in the comics or the 90's Spidey cartoon. Wilson Fisk in the netflix series is pretty much a introvert and uncomfortable around a lot of people (strangers) that's why he let Wesley do most of the job.
 
1 hour left. Gotta head to the cinema with the girlfriend soon!

I'm currently 30 minutes into The Winter Soldier and that one rocks so far. So touching with Peggy Carter and Steve Rogers.
 
Gotta wait till Monday but gotta ask reviewers said Hawkeye gets more screen time is this legit or is it because he had fuck all do on 1 it seems more in this film? I want more hawkeye
 
Sadly, the action is a Bayformers tier mess.

Really? The trailer stuff was more chaotic than the first avengers but I could still tell what was going on.

Out of all the mcu criticisms the only one I agree with is weak villains. Loki at the very least was charismatic, but the rest have been blah to mediocre.
 
Just saw it in Seoul (in a 4D theater no less) and it was dope as hell.

If you haven't seen it yet you should do so ASAP.

And now I'm off to the spoiler thread...
 
Really? The trailer stuff was more chaotic than the first avengers but I could still tell what was going on.

Out of all the mcu criticisms the only one I agree with is weak villains. Loki at the very least was charismatic, but the rest have been blah to mediocre.

I think the action is quite easy to follow. Nowhere near the mess of the Bayformers films.

Why do you both assume that I mean the action scenes are incoherent?

They're sloppily over-edited, full of weightless CG, and are generally unimpressive to look at. I think you'd have no trouble following the action scenes in Transformers either, if the robot designs weren't all so busy and similar looking.

Edit: Both these clips show what I'm talking about (spoilers obviously).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CXgvlMvVqY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ngmj5FGcyg

Easy to follow, but it's still a mess. I don't even think it's Whedon's direction, it's all on the editing and bad CG.
 
Are there no reports on how welll the thursday-opneres have done?
Yesterday around this time we had a report on Deadline , on hew well the Wednesday openers did (despite week Euro)




Ah I see, you mean the quality of the scores:
For me it was Iron Man 1: meh, 2: can't rember a thing, 3: absolutely great
Thor: great, 2: meh
Cap: OK, TWS: aquired taste, love it now. (you don't remember "taking a stand"?)
Avengers: OK to great
Age Of Ultron: forgetable, except when it quotes previous themes (2 excerpts are directly taken from Avengers, one badly edited)
So I guess prepare to be disappointed.

Which part from the score of Avengers do you consider to be a SHIELD theme?

By the way: AoS: great theme, OK otherwise
Agent Carter: forgetable
Daredevil: OK theme, very forgetable otherwise

and GotG's score: OK to great

Some pieces of music in the One-shots were good as well: "All Hail The King" was good + Mike post's new 80s theme

The movie opens May 1st so Thursday opening is next week
 
More innocents need to be shown dying in these movies. All the transports making it away safely? Bullshit, from my extensive real world video game experience, at least half the transports need to be destroyed.

Also Natasha: does she have to strike a pose in every scene she is in? Her fly kick at the start was laughable.
 
I don't think so, I mean I don't know a lot about the Kingpin, but in the series it was as much his origin story as Daredevil's

No it wasn't. Fisk was well established as a threat and a major player long, long before episode 1. We never get Fisk's "origin", we only see
his downfall
. Wesley acts as his rep because he prefers to act from behind the scenes. No one knows where he can be found. Even
Gao
only finds out where he lives very late in the series, and that's because he was fucking up due to the vanessa business. He's scrubbed every trace of himself from public record to keep a low profile intentionally. Keep in mind that he has loads of police and judges on his payroll, and
the hand
is working for him through
Nobu
.

His meeting Vanessa "changes him" and that's part of his character development. The Wilson Fisk you see in Daredevil isn't the one that's been running hell's kitchen as a crime lord for years- this one is conflicted and coming apart at the seams because of that relationship.

and he isn't like that in the comics or the 90's Spidey cartoon. Wilson Fisk in the netflix series is pretty much a introvert and uncomfortable around a lot of people (strangers) that's why he let Wesley do most of the job.

he isn't like the comics or the 90s cartoon because this is the MCU. different interpretation of the character.

Fisk is "uncomfortable" around vanessa and this begins to bleed over into his professional life. But this is a dude that has no problems
beating people to death with his bare hands when they displease him.
Fisk isn't an introvert, he has rage issues. Fisk is firmly established as Kingpin here.
 
Could there be a possibility that Marvel is getting a bit sloppy because they know anything Avengers will just sell well because of the cast makeup? Hell just having Downey is enough to sell tickets.
 
Could there be a possibility that Marvel is getting a bit sloppy because they know anything Avengers will just sell well because of the cast makeup? Hell just having Downey is enough to sell tickets.

I doubt that. Specially Downey is most likely gone soon.

Plus: Movie spoilers

They are building towards Iron Man/Hawkeye/Thor leaving(ish) the Avengers to make room for a new team.
 
I think Thor is already confirmed for Part 1.



Yeah, sure, they will just have short cameos in the big Thanos Story Arc conclusion, definitly.

You don't seem to understand what I mean at all.
They don't have to be on the Avengers roster to be in IW, even in a big role. Not being on the official Avengers team doesn't mean they have to be cameos.
 
The movie was fun! But Ultron was super lame, I expected that he will be super strong and hard to beat. But it didn't happen, I felt like there is no way that the avengers could lose this fight.

I really wanna see what comes next, but this movie should have been a highlight, instead it feels like a spin-off or whatever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom