Then, what did you make of Charlie Hebdo, out of curiosity? It's a very fine line.
I feel like this could be turned into a right wing facebook comment with a totally unrelated second phrase and artifacts.
Then, what did you make of Charlie Hebdo, out of curiosity? It's a very fine line.
Either way, what the American constitution has to say about "Freedom of Speech"--or how people choose to interpret those laws in the USA--has little bearing on the legal framework in France.I thought it was fairly obvious. Where does "freedom of speech" end basically?
Either way, what the American constitution has to say about "Freedom of Speech"--or how people choose to interpret those laws in the USA--has little bearing on the legal framework in France.
I thought it was fairly obvious. Where does "freedom of speech" end basically?
Jurisdiction is irrelevant in this case. I was trying to compare the vile stuff Charlie Hebdo is publishing to Reddit's less appropriate (to say the least) subreddits... Where do you draw the line regarding what's acceptable and what's not.
Also, one of the concept upon which Reddit was founded is freedom of speech - banning the subreddits is a major departure from that principle
Jurisdiction is irrelevant in this case. I was trying to compare the vile stuff Charlie Hebdo is publishing to Reddit's less appropriate (to say the least) subreddits... Where do you draw the line regarding what's acceptable and what's not.
Also, one of the concept upon which Reddit was founded is freedom of speech - banning the subreddits is a major departure from that principle
Fair enough. Where the line is drawn will always be a subjective matter decided by the administrators (or what have you) running the private forum, though. It would probably be easier to just find another outlet that is willing to host your views. I think there are different complications depending on whether we are involving the government, the press, or private parties in our discussion.Jurisdiction is irrelevant in this case. I was trying to compare the vile stuff Charlie Hebdo is publishing to Reddit's less appropriate (to say the least) subreddits... Where do you draw the line regarding what's acceptable and what's not.
Also, one of the concept upon which Reddit was founded is freedom of speech - banning the subreddits is a major departure from that principle
Jurisdiction is irrelevant in this case. I was trying to compare the vile stuff Charlie Hebdo is publishing to Reddit's less appropriate (to say the least) subreddits... Where do you draw the line regarding what's acceptable and what's not.
Also, one of the concept upon which Reddit was founded is freedom of speech - banning the subreddits is a major departure from that principle
Reddit is a business, not a government or outlet for truth. It wasn't founded on free speech, it was founded on lack of inhibitions and has decided that stance is no longer as profitable, so they're changing their tune. There's nothing inherently noble or worthy of protection about protecting a bottom line, and using a for profit business as a measure of integrity is a flawed premise. Even if we do entertain it momentarily, CH's caricatures, no matter how occasionally disgusting, at least had some kind of message behind them whereas a subreddit devoted to watching black people die has no inherent value.
Reddit is big money now. Their principles matter less to them than the ability to monetize the good parts, which the vile shit impeded. I support a company attempting to operate in line with free speech ideals, myself, but the impracticability of that is just reality and is, in truth, unavoidable.
Reddit may be big money now, but that's only because of unpaid user-created content. If you manage to piss off the most influential and vocal users, then viewership may drop, which in turn will affect future financial performance. It's a very fine line, again. Reddit can afford to be less tolerant, but it will, at some point, start to hurt its bottom line.
Not so sure about that. They relied on shock value and controversy to make money.
Reddit may be big money now, but that's only because of unpaid user-created content. If you manage to piss off the most influential and vocal users, then viewership may drop, which in turn will affect future financial performance. It's a very fine line, again. Reddit can afford to be less tolerant, but it will, at some point, start to hurt its bottom line.
Not every rule derives its definitions from federal law, and Reddit has made where it draws the lines abundantly clear. If the supporters of the animated loli junk draw from federal law to counter Reddit's policy they may as well be quoting the King James Bible, or Webster's.
And? My opinion is that Reddit should and have every rights to ban lolicon section. What that guy said about calling lolicon stuff "animated child porn" does has a point.
I'm not exactly sure what Lolicon entails, but if it is sexual in nature then by the very definition he himself posted it would be classified as CP.
But free speech!
I thought this was 'Murica!
The distinction he's trying to draw is that animated characters are not really minors, which is who the law covers and exists to protect, they are fictive representations of minors and not illegal under U.S. law, which is reddit's traditional line of demarcation for what is and is not allowed.
Federal law defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor.
I find it interesting to see people on GAF worry about freedom of speech regarding Reddit. Aside from the obvious government vs. a webhost who can do whatever they want with their site, Neogaf is way more censored than most online communities.
I get that but if it is sexual in nature than under his very own defintion..
![]()
Lolicon would count.
I get that but if it is sexual in nature than under his very own defintion..
Lolicon would count.
I think the difference is that drawings are not considered "minors". The part you have bolded is talking about videos/pictures/whatever of actual minors. That being said, it might not be the case anyway. Most companies get around it by aging up the people depicted. This is where someone inserts a 1000 year old dragon who looks 10. But I'm not a lawyer and all that good stuff, just don't look at the stuff and you'll be good.
No it says any, language is important when you talk about legal definitions. Also yes they aren't real human beings but I think even fictional characters with ages would still be considered minors under this def.
We did it guys, NeoGAF won.
name subscribers
/r/CoonTown 20888
/r/Lolicons 12339
/r/Pomf 7360
/r/LoliShota 3169
/r/WatchNiggersDie 590
/r/TacticalLolis 516
/r/LoliFeet 279
/r/TrueLoli 237
/r/Rule34NoCensorship 135
/r/TheLoliLocker 84
/r/bestofcoontown 53
/r/lolipee 32
/r/18datingwomenforsex 29
/r/FreePSNCodesGenerator 21
/r/jart 10
/r/badgirl 9
/r/letter 8
/r/ufc190rouvscour 7
/r/SWBFSWBFSWBFSWBF 7
/r/RapingEllenPao 7
/r/Xforce 7
/r/itachi_circlejerk 7
/r/FakeMadeReal 6
/r/MI5 6
/r/impostors 5
/r/BeatingEllenPao 5
/r/indymedia 5
/r/Sakura 5
/r/reactiongiffles 4
/r/Low 4
/r/bluemonkeys 4
/r/Obito 4
quarantined
name subscribers
/r/SHHHHHEEEEEEEEIIIITT 16552
/r/BlackFathers 9770
/r/GreatApes 4755
/r/TrayvonMartin 1340
/r/BlackCrime 1257
/r/WhitesWinFights 889
/r/ferguson 799
/r/KikeTown 744
/r/N1GGERS 641
/r/USBlackCulture 308
/r/NiggerDrama 331
/r/NiggerFacts 307
/r/niggersstories 284
/r/niggervideos 271
/r/niggerspics 268
/r/funnyniggers 213
/r/didntdonuffins 201
/r/NiggersNews 199
/r/WorldStarHP 167
/r/JustBlackGirlThings 160
/r/NiggerCartoons 157
/r/NiggerMythology 153
/r/gibsmedat 152
/r/teenapers 146
/r/WTFniggers 141
/r/NiggersTIL 138
/r/TheRacistRedPill 137
/r/Detoilet 129
/r/RacistNiggers 122
/r/NiggersGIFs 117
/r/apewrangling 108
/r/Apefrica 108
/r/muhdick 106
/r/DrawPeople 96
/r/NiggerDocumentaries 83
/r/chimpmusic 81
/r/NegroFree 77
/r/ChimpinAintEasy 73
/r/niggerhistorymonth 65
/r/ChimpireMETA 64
/r/ChimpireOfftopic 58
/r/BlackHusbands 50
/r/RacoonsAreNiggers 45
/r/NiggerSafari 16
/r/TIL_4_Niggers 13
/r/whitesarecriminals 12
/r/FreddieGray 12
/r/transrace 8
/r/LedariusWilliams 5
/r/Jason_Harrison 4
/r/IsmaaiylBrinsley 3
/r/VonderritMyers 1
/r/WilliamChapman 1
Reddit isnt complete trash, it has some great, small, focused sub-reddit communities that I enjoy for discussion and news, but any of the larger subreddits without strict moderation are unanimously awful.
It's great that they're finally taking a position against some of the fringe elements and hope it continues to happen. I wouldn't mind seeing all the meta communities gone, also.
They should've banned these subs way before coming after FPH.
I didn't understand their logic at the time. I guess fat acceptance > racism and child porn.
I'm not about to click on all of these to double-check, but this is apparently the list of banned and quarantined subs.
Banned:
Code:[B]/r/jart 10[/B]
RIP free speech.
Then, what did you make of Charlie Hebdo, out of curiosity? It's a very fine line.
What's the story with the PSNcode one? A scam sub or like an innocuous name hiding something behind it?
On eurogamer when you got banned you were actually just put on general ignore, could still post but nobody would see it. Is that pretty much shadow banning?Shadowbanning is a hilarious tool, though.
It's so damn cruel.
On eurogamer when you got banned you were actually just put on general ignore, could still post but nobody would see it. Is that pretty much shadow banning?
/r/NiggerMythology
Yep.
I mean, just the titles themselves should be a nonononono.
Damn. They say nigger sooo much..must think it keeps their teeth white.I'm not about to click on all of these to double-check, but this is apparently the list of banned and quarantined subs.
Banned:
Quarantined:Code:name subscribers /r/CoonTown 20888 /r/Lolicons 12339 /r/Pomf 7360 /r/LoliShota 3169 /r/WatchNiggersDie 590 /r/TacticalLolis 516 /r/LoliFeet 279 /r/TrueLoli 237 /r/Rule34NoCensorship 135 /r/TheLoliLocker 84 /r/bestofcoontown 53 /r/lolipee 32 /r/18datingwomenforsex 29 /r/FreePSNCodesGenerator 21 /r/jart 10 /r/badgirl 9 /r/letter 8 /r/ufc190rouvscour 7 /r/SWBFSWBFSWBFSWBF 7 /r/RapingEllenPao 7 /r/Xforce 7 /r/itachi_circlejerk 7 /r/FakeMadeReal 6 /r/MI5 6 /r/impostors 5 /r/BeatingEllenPao 5 /r/indymedia 5 /r/Sakura 5 /r/reactiongiffles 4 /r/Low 4 /r/bluemonkeys 4 /r/Obito 4
Code:quarantined name subscribers /r/SHHHHHEEEEEEEEIIIITT 16552 /r/BlackFathers 9770 /r/GreatApes 4755 /r/TrayvonMartin 1340 /r/BlackCrime 1257 /r/WhitesWinFights 889 /r/ferguson 799 /r/KikeTown 744 /r/N1GGERS 641 /r/USBlackCulture 308 /r/NiggerDrama 331 /r/NiggerFacts 307 /r/niggersstories 284 /r/niggervideos 271 /r/niggerspics 268 /r/funnyniggers 213 /r/didntdonuffins 201 /r/NiggersNews 199 /r/WorldStarHP 167 /r/JustBlackGirlThings 160 /r/NiggerCartoons 157 /r/NiggerMythology 153 /r/gibsmedat 152 /r/teenapers 146 /r/WTFniggers 141 /r/NiggersTIL 138 /r/TheRacistRedPill 137 /r/Detoilet 129 /r/RacistNiggers 122 /r/NiggersGIFs 117 /r/apewrangling 108 /r/Apefrica 108 /r/muhdick 106 /r/DrawPeople 96 /r/NiggerDocumentaries 83 /r/chimpmusic 81 /r/NegroFree 77 /r/ChimpinAintEasy 73 /r/niggerhistorymonth 65 /r/ChimpireMETA 64 /r/ChimpireOfftopic 58 /r/BlackHusbands 50 /r/RacoonsAreNiggers 45 /r/NiggerSafari 16 /r/TIL_4_Niggers 13 /r/whitesarecriminals 12 /r/FreddieGray 12 /r/transrace 8 /r/LedariusWilliams 5 /r/Jason_Harrison 4 /r/IsmaaiylBrinsley 3 /r/VonderritMyers 1 /r/WilliamChapman 1
RIP free speech.
I'm also wondering what the hell pomf and jart are meant to mean (abbreviations?), but possibly I don't want to know.