Reddit finally bans "Coontown", "WatchN*****sDie", & animated child porn forums

Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought it was fairly obvious. Where does "freedom of speech" end basically?
Either way, what the American constitution has to say about "Freedom of Speech"--or how people choose to interpret those laws in the USA--has little bearing on the legal framework in France.
 
Either way, what the American constitution has to say about "Freedom of Speech"--or how people choose to interpret those laws in the USA--has little bearing on the legal framework in France.

Jurisdiction is irrelevant in this case. I was trying to compare the vile stuff Charlie Hebdo is publishing to Reddit's less appropriate (to say the least) subreddits... Where do you draw the line regarding what's acceptable and what's not.

Also, one of the concept upon which Reddit was founded is freedom of speech - banning the subreddits is a major departure from that principle
 
I thought it was fairly obvious. Where does "freedom of speech" end basically?

Jurisdiction is irrelevant in this case. I was trying to compare the vile stuff Charlie Hebdo is publishing to Reddit's less appropriate (to say the least) subreddits... Where do you draw the line regarding what's acceptable and what's not.

Also, one of the concept upon which Reddit was founded is freedom of speech - banning the subreddits is a major departure from that principle

Reddit is a business, not a government or outlet for truth. It wasn't founded on free speech, it was founded on lack of inhibitions and has decided that stance is no longer as profitable, so they're changing their tune. There's nothing inherently noble or worthy of protection about protecting a bottom line, and using a for profit business as a measure of integrity is a flawed premise. Even if we do entertain it momentarily, CH's caricatures, no matter how occasionally disgusting, at least had some kind of message behind them whereas a subreddit devoted to watching black people die has no inherent value.
 
Jurisdiction is irrelevant in this case. I was trying to compare the vile stuff Charlie Hebdo is publishing to Reddit's less appropriate (to say the least) subreddits... Where do you draw the line regarding what's acceptable and what's not.

Also, one of the concept upon which Reddit was founded is freedom of speech - banning the subreddits is a major departure from that principle

Reddit is big money now. Their principles matter less to them than the ability to monetize the good parts, which the vile shit impeded. I support a company attempting to operate in line with free speech ideals, myself, but the impracticability of that is just reality and is, in truth, unavoidable.
 
Jurisdiction is irrelevant in this case. I was trying to compare the vile stuff Charlie Hebdo is publishing to Reddit's less appropriate (to say the least) subreddits... Where do you draw the line regarding what's acceptable and what's not.

Also, one of the concept upon which Reddit was founded is freedom of speech - banning the subreddits is a major departure from that principle
Fair enough. Where the line is drawn will always be a subjective matter decided by the administrators (or what have you) running the private forum, though. It would probably be easier to just find another outlet that is willing to host your views. I think there are different complications depending on whether we are involving the government, the press, or private parties in our discussion.
 
Jurisdiction is irrelevant in this case. I was trying to compare the vile stuff Charlie Hebdo is publishing to Reddit's less appropriate (to say the least) subreddits... Where do you draw the line regarding what's acceptable and what's not.

Also, one of the concept upon which Reddit was founded is freedom of speech - banning the subreddits is a major departure from that principle

That's not exactly true.
 
Reddit is a business, not a government or outlet for truth. It wasn't founded on free speech, it was founded on lack of inhibitions and has decided that stance is no longer as profitable, so they're changing their tune. There's nothing inherently noble or worthy of protection about protecting a bottom line, and using a for profit business as a measure of integrity is a flawed premise. Even if we do entertain it momentarily, CH's caricatures, no matter how occasionally disgusting, at least had some kind of message behind them whereas a subreddit devoted to watching black people die has no inherent value.

Not so sure about that. They relied on shock value and controversy to make money.

Reddit is big money now. Their principles matter less to them than the ability to monetize the good parts, which the vile shit impeded. I support a company attempting to operate in line with free speech ideals, myself, but the impracticability of that is just reality and is, in truth, unavoidable.

Reddit may be big money now, but that's only because of unpaid user-created content. If you manage to piss off the most influential and vocal users, then viewership may drop, which in turn will affect future financial performance. It's a very fine line, again. Reddit can afford to be less tolerant, but it will, at some point, start to hurt its bottom line.
 
Reddit may be big money now, but that's only because of unpaid user-created content. If you manage to piss off the most influential and vocal users, then viewership may drop, which in turn will affect future financial performance. It's a very fine line, again. Reddit can afford to be less tolerant, but it will, at some point, start to hurt its bottom line.

I don't think the racists were their most influential users. And clearly supporting them has hurt their bottom line which is why they're changing shit up.
 
Not so sure about that. They relied on shock value and controversy to make money.



Reddit may be big money now, but that's only because of unpaid user-created content. If you manage to piss off the most influential and vocal users, then viewership may drop, which in turn will affect future financial performance. It's a very fine line, again. Reddit can afford to be less tolerant, but it will, at some point, start to hurt its bottom line.

The racists aren't bringing in the big money. In all likelihood, Reddit's senior management is acting on some kind of statistical info or corporate hunch that the libertarian ideals were not as profitable as people's contempt for the racist subreddits was unprofitable. I thought the quarantine was a decent compromise, though I was given pause by those who pointed out that it essentially turned everyone else into a subsidizer of those reprehensible places, but ultimately, it seems Reddit's plan is to phase out the heinous shit while maintaining some kind of phony veneer of sticking to their principles by doing it piecemeal. Which is what any corporation would do, really, so it's hard to be particularly upset by it.
 
I think it's fair to say that this change wasn't due to them realizing that they were harboring some vile shit on the internet and wanting to do the right thing:
CLrRWc0UcAAQ_og.png:large

That said, any libertarian ideals they expressed were because that was what they felt the community wanted to hear. And people bought that hook line and sinker.

They have the numbers now so now they're working on getting the advertisers invested and they are finding that their anarchistic policies were hindering them. They're ideal is "what can we do next to increase the worth of our corporation". That was their primary concern then and it is their primary concern now.
 
Fantastic!

At this rate with all the cleaning up reddit's doing, Voat is going to quickly end up becoming one of the most vile and toxic website on the internet. I'm okay with this, as long as it never becomes popular.
 
Not every rule derives its definitions from federal law, and Reddit has made where it draws the lines abundantly clear. If the supporters of the animated loli junk draw from federal law to counter Reddit's policy they may as well be quoting the King James Bible, or Webster's.

And? My opinion is that Reddit should and have every rights to ban lolicon section. What that guy said about calling lolicon stuff "animated child porn" does has a point.
 
And? My opinion is that Reddit should and have every rights to ban lolicon section. What that guy said about calling lolicon stuff "animated child porn" does has a point.

I'm not exactly sure what Lolicon entails, but if it is sexual in nature then by the very definition he himself posted it would be classified as CP.
 
I'm not exactly sure what Lolicon entails, but if it is sexual in nature then by the very definition he himself posted it would be classified as CP.

The distinction he's trying to draw is that animated characters are not really minors, which is who the law covers and exists to protect, they are fictive representations of minors and not illegal under U.S. law, which is reddit's traditional line of demarcation for what is and is not allowed.
 
The distinction he's trying to draw is that animated characters are not really minors, which is who the law covers and exists to protect, they are fictive representations of minors and not illegal under U.S. law, which is reddit's traditional line of demarcation for what is and is not allowed.

I get that but if it is sexual in nature than under his very own defintion..

BYdzzwn.png


Federal law defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor.

Lolicon would count.
 
I find it interesting to see people on GAF worry about freedom of speech regarding Reddit. Aside from the obvious government vs. a webhost who can do whatever they want with their site, Neogaf is way more censored than most online communities.
 
I get that but if it is sexual in nature than under his very own defintion..
Lolicon would count.

I think the difference is that drawings are not considered "minors". The part you have bolded is talking about videos/pictures/whatever of actual minors. That being said, it might not be the case anyway. Most companies get around it by aging up the people depicted. This is where someone inserts a 1000 year old dragon who looks 10. But I'm not a lawyer and all that good stuff, just don't look at the stuff and you'll be good.
 
I think the difference is that drawings are not considered "minors". The part you have bolded is talking about videos/pictures/whatever of actual minors. That being said, it might not be the case anyway. Most companies get around it by aging up the people depicted. This is where someone inserts a 1000 year old dragon who looks 10. But I'm not a lawyer and all that good stuff, just don't look at the stuff and you'll be good.

No it says any, language is important when you talk about legal definitions. Also yes they aren't real human beings but I think even fictional characters with ages would still be considered minors under this def.
 
No it says any, language is important when you talk about legal definitions. Also yes they aren't real human beings but I think even fictional characters with ages would still be considered minors under this def.

No, "minors" is also defined in the quoted image, and part of that definition is "persons".
 
Reddit isnt complete trash, it has some great, small, focused sub-reddit communities that I enjoy for discussion and news, but any of the larger subreddits without strict moderation are unanimously awful.

It's great that they're finally taking a position against some of the fringe elements and hope it continues to happen. I wouldn't mind seeing all the meta communities gone, also.
 
They should've banned these subs way before coming after FPH.

I didn't understand their logic at the time. I guess fat acceptance > racism and child porn.
 
I'm not about to click on all of these to double-check, but this is apparently the list of banned and quarantined subs.

Banned:
Code:
name 	subscribers
/r/CoonTown 	20888
/r/Lolicons 	12339
/r/Pomf 	7360
/r/LoliShota 	3169
/r/WatchNiggersDie 	590
/r/TacticalLolis 	516
/r/LoliFeet 	279
/r/TrueLoli 	237
/r/Rule34NoCensorship 	135
/r/TheLoliLocker 	84
/r/bestofcoontown 	53
/r/lolipee 	32
/r/18datingwomenforsex 	29
/r/FreePSNCodesGenerator 	21
/r/jart 	10
/r/badgirl 	9
/r/letter 	8
/r/ufc190rouvscour 	7
/r/SWBFSWBFSWBFSWBF 	7
/r/RapingEllenPao 	7
/r/Xforce 	7
/r/itachi_circlejerk 	7
/r/FakeMadeReal 	6
/r/MI5 	6
/r/impostors 	5
/r/BeatingEllenPao 	5
/r/indymedia 	5
/r/Sakura 	5
/r/reactiongiffles 	4
/r/Low 	4
/r/bluemonkeys 	4
/r/Obito 	4
Quarantined:
Code:
quarantined
name 	subscribers
/r/SHHHHHEEEEEEEEIIIITT 	16552
/r/BlackFathers 	9770
/r/GreatApes 	4755
/r/TrayvonMartin 	1340
/r/BlackCrime 	1257
/r/WhitesWinFights 	889
/r/ferguson 	799
/r/KikeTown 	744
/r/N1GGERS 	641
/r/USBlackCulture 	308
/r/NiggerDrama 	331
/r/NiggerFacts 	307
/r/niggersstories 	284
/r/niggervideos 	271
/r/niggerspics 	268
/r/funnyniggers 	213
/r/didntdonuffins 	201
/r/NiggersNews 	199
/r/WorldStarHP 	167
/r/JustBlackGirlThings 	160
/r/NiggerCartoons 	157
/r/NiggerMythology 	153
/r/gibsmedat 	152
/r/teenapers 	146
/r/WTFniggers 	141
/r/NiggersTIL 	138
/r/TheRacistRedPill 	137
/r/Detoilet 	129
/r/RacistNiggers 	122
/r/NiggersGIFs 	117
/r/apewrangling 	108
/r/Apefrica 	108
/r/muhdick 	106
/r/DrawPeople 	96
/r/NiggerDocumentaries 	83
/r/chimpmusic 	81
/r/NegroFree 	77
/r/ChimpinAintEasy 	73
/r/niggerhistorymonth 	65
/r/ChimpireMETA 	64
/r/ChimpireOfftopic 	58
/r/BlackHusbands 	50
/r/RacoonsAreNiggers 	45
/r/NiggerSafari 	16
/r/TIL_4_Niggers 	13
/r/whitesarecriminals 	12
/r/FreddieGray 	12
/r/transrace 	8
/r/LedariusWilliams 	5
/r/Jason_Harrison 	4
/r/IsmaaiylBrinsley 	3
/r/VonderritMyers 	1
/r/WilliamChapman 	1

RIP free speech.
 
Reddit isnt complete trash, it has some great, small, focused sub-reddit communities that I enjoy for discussion and news, but any of the larger subreddits without strict moderation are unanimously awful.

It's great that they're finally taking a position against some of the fringe elements and hope it continues to happen. I wouldn't mind seeing all the meta communities gone, also.

Reddit is an amazing resource.

The issue is that they wanted to wash their hands from criticism from the problematic subreddits.

The found out you really can't do that. And unlike Usenet, the most apt analog of Reddit, Reddit wants to make money.

Once you try to position yourself as a mass market product, you're going to open yourself to those criticism.

They could technically still stick to their ideological guns, but they want to make money.
 
That is a lot of loli subreddits. Gonna be a lot of people free to lecture on the difference between pedophilia, hebephilia, and ephebophilia in the regular subs.
 
They should've banned these subs way before coming after FPH.

I didn't understand their logic at the time. I guess fat acceptance > racism and child porn.

FPH was actively harassing and/or doxxing people which was more of an immediate financial threat. Reddit ops don't actually care about the content so much as the content's effect on the coffers.
 
What's the story with the PSNcode one? A scam sub or like an innocuous name hiding something behind it?

I'm wondering this too! It kind of jumps out at you, doesn't it?

I'm also wondering what the hell pomf and jart are meant to mean (abbreviations?), but possibly I don't want to know.
 
I mean, just the titles themselves should be a nonononono.

Again, under more strict moderation protocols, sure.

Reddit didn't care as long as it wasn't illegal.

They're only covering their asses now because it's hurting their bottom line and losing top talent to other startups does hurt their bottom line.
 
I'm not about to click on all of these to double-check, but this is apparently the list of banned and quarantined subs.

Banned:
Code:
name 	subscribers
/r/CoonTown 	20888
/r/Lolicons 	12339
/r/Pomf 	7360
/r/LoliShota 	3169
/r/WatchNiggersDie 	590
/r/TacticalLolis 	516
/r/LoliFeet 	279
/r/TrueLoli 	237
/r/Rule34NoCensorship 	135
/r/TheLoliLocker 	84
/r/bestofcoontown 	53
/r/lolipee 	32
/r/18datingwomenforsex 	29
/r/FreePSNCodesGenerator 	21
/r/jart 	10
/r/badgirl 	9
/r/letter 	8
/r/ufc190rouvscour 	7
/r/SWBFSWBFSWBFSWBF 	7
/r/RapingEllenPao 	7
/r/Xforce 	7
/r/itachi_circlejerk 	7
/r/FakeMadeReal 	6
/r/MI5 	6
/r/impostors 	5
/r/BeatingEllenPao 	5
/r/indymedia 	5
/r/Sakura 	5
/r/reactiongiffles 	4
/r/Low 	4
/r/bluemonkeys 	4
/r/Obito 	4
Quarantined:
Code:
quarantined
name 	subscribers
/r/SHHHHHEEEEEEEEIIIITT 	16552
/r/BlackFathers 	9770
/r/GreatApes 	4755
/r/TrayvonMartin 	1340
/r/BlackCrime 	1257
/r/WhitesWinFights 	889
/r/ferguson 	799
/r/KikeTown 	744
/r/N1GGERS 	641
/r/USBlackCulture 	308
/r/NiggerDrama 	331
/r/NiggerFacts 	307
/r/niggersstories 	284
/r/niggervideos 	271
/r/niggerspics 	268
/r/funnyniggers 	213
/r/didntdonuffins 	201
/r/NiggersNews 	199
/r/WorldStarHP 	167
/r/JustBlackGirlThings 	160
/r/NiggerCartoons 	157
/r/NiggerMythology 	153
/r/gibsmedat 	152
/r/teenapers 	146
/r/WTFniggers 	141
/r/NiggersTIL 	138
/r/TheRacistRedPill 	137
/r/Detoilet 	129
/r/RacistNiggers 	122
/r/NiggersGIFs 	117
/r/apewrangling 	108
/r/Apefrica 	108
/r/muhdick 	106
/r/DrawPeople 	96
/r/NiggerDocumentaries 	83
/r/chimpmusic 	81
/r/NegroFree 	77
/r/ChimpinAintEasy 	73
/r/niggerhistorymonth 	65
/r/ChimpireMETA 	64
/r/ChimpireOfftopic 	58
/r/BlackHusbands 	50
/r/RacoonsAreNiggers 	45
/r/NiggerSafari 	16
/r/TIL_4_Niggers 	13
/r/whitesarecriminals 	12
/r/FreddieGray 	12
/r/transrace 	8
/r/LedariusWilliams 	5
/r/Jason_Harrison 	4
/r/IsmaaiylBrinsley 	3
/r/VonderritMyers 	1
/r/WilliamChapman 	1

RIP free speech.
Damn. They say nigger sooo much..must think it keeps their teeth white.
 
I'm also wondering what the hell pomf and jart are meant to mean (abbreviations?), but possibly I don't want to know.

"pomf" is a hentai manga thing, it's the onomatopoeia for the sound someone makes when they kind of drop onto a bed. "jart"'s news to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom