Uh, just to be clear, Remedy said it'd unlock at 6am PT. I didn't pull the time out of my arse for the sake of "e-cred".
Edit: The tweet has since been deleted, but:
Quantum Break PC performance thread
- Thread starter GroinShooter
- Start date
Uh, just to be clear, Remedy said it'd unlock at 6am PT. I didn't pull the time out of my arse for the sake of "e-cred".
Edit: The tweet has since been deleted, but:
Performance test, first with my optimal performance/image quality settings where I have turned volumetric lighting and GI down to medium with scaling on 1080p, then with scaling off and lastly with everything maxed out scaling off.
https://youtu.be/dlSlV1yg74U
PC:
I7 6700K 4.5 Ghz
GeForce GTX 1080
16GB DDR4 3000 Mhz
https://youtu.be/dlSlV1yg74U
PC:
I7 6700K 4.5 Ghz
GeForce GTX 1080
16GB DDR4 3000 Mhz
Damn, so that means I'll have to resist the temptation to cancel my physical and just get it now. For fuck's sake, Amazon, ship the damn thing already!
So, 120-150 fps at 1080p medium with scaling on?
That's ~45% higher resolution than XB1, and 4-5x the framerate.
b&jy77VjiKn$#F
Member
Has anyone done a comparison between DX11's performance vs DX12's?
FWIW, I'm getting 100-120fps on the medium preset, 1080p with upscaling on - is this close to Xbox One settings? This was in the opening section, the dockyard with paul serene and the warehouse after it with jack joyce. Not really stressed it though, mostly just walking around. Been a while since I played it properly and can't remember how the performance is in fire fights, etc.
I'm not really interested in playing it, but a few posts made me think I'd just see what the performance is like at what is supposed to be XB1 settings. I'm on a 980Ti, 4770k, 16GB RAM, etc, etc.
I think that performance puts it about inline with the XB1 version or at least not far off it given the hardware capability difference.
I'm not really interested in playing it, but a few posts made me think I'd just see what the performance is like at what is supposed to be XB1 settings. I'm on a 980Ti, 4770k, 16GB RAM, etc, etc.
I think that performance puts it about inline with the XB1 version or at least not far off it given the hardware capability difference.
Hm.
I'm tempted to get this based on a.) supporting Remedy, even though I'm not sure I'm on-board with the game, and b.) to show Microsoft that they might as well be sticking their PC efforts on Steam too and make the most of the platform.
Seems pretty hefty, performance-wise, though. Ideally, I want to hit 1080/60 on high, but even that might looking like a stretch.
I'm tempted to get this based on a.) supporting Remedy, even though I'm not sure I'm on-board with the game, and b.) to show Microsoft that they might as well be sticking their PC efforts on Steam too and make the most of the platform.
Seems pretty hefty, performance-wise, though. Ideally, I want to hit 1080/60 on high, but even that might looking like a stretch.
Yeah, that's close. 1080p with scaling on is still a higher resolution than the xb1 version. 1600x900 would be very close.
dgrdsv
Member
I don't see anything impressive in this shot beyond the AA maybe?Yeah it's not, but I found it (with everything going on on screen, plus all the lighting, reflections, etc) to be beyond anything else when it came out. I think people sell it FAR short of everything it is doing on-screen. FAR short. There's a reason they had to use the reconstruction and shortcuts JUST to get it running at 30fps on the X1.
I'd like a breakdown of why and what it is doing should NOT be taxing by people that freely say otherwise.
The game is absolutely impressive. My own shots..
That's a simple specular reflection back from 2004.Even little lights on enemies helmets reflect off of them. The poly-count at times has to be ridiculous too. Things like time backpacks/hardware are insanely detailed.
That's a texture back from 1991.Things like veins (in an NPC) show in ears and thinner body parts appear to show light though them (can't remember what that is called)
Or maybe you just don't know what you're talking about.
dgrdsv
Member
And it's awful because?
91? 04? telling someone they dont know what theyre talking about? lol ok.
SilentRage47
Member
Played for half an hour, here's some tests I did:
i5 6600k @4.6
Asus GTX 1080p
16gb ram
SSD
-1440p with Gsync, Ultra settings:
50-60fps with some drop, GSync helps a lot but there is still stuttering.
-1080p no GSync, Ultra settings.
60 fps with pretty much no big drop. Minor stutter.
There's something wrong with ingame VSync in my opinion, I get a lot of stutter with it on and fps are always between 58 and 59.
In the end it runs pretty much ok on my system, I'll just play it on my TV on full HD.
i5 6600k @4.6
Asus GTX 1080p
16gb ram
SSD
-1440p with Gsync, Ultra settings:
50-60fps with some drop, GSync helps a lot but there is still stuttering.
-1080p no GSync, Ultra settings.
60 fps with pretty much no big drop. Minor stutter.
There's something wrong with ingame VSync in my opinion, I get a lot of stutter with it on and fps are always between 58 and 59.
In the end it runs pretty much ok on my system, I'll just play it on my TV on full HD.
Anyone that ordered the physical `Timeless Edition' actually get theirs?
I ordered a month and a half ago and just got an `Approval Required' message from Amazon saying that it's not available yet. =( I'm hoping that there's just a delay for the physical copy (again!) and not that they oversold the damned thing!
I ordered a month and a half ago and just got an `Approval Required' message from Amazon saying that it's not available yet. =( I'm hoping that there's just a delay for the physical copy (again!) and not that they oversold the damned thing!
X-D This post is hilarious
What are the games you found to be impressive? Cause chances are I've already played them and I can shred their graphics to pieces too.
The Janitor
Member
VlaudTheImpaler
tl;dr
That's just a tad hyperbolic don't you think?
I don't know what you are trying to prove by posting two pics of Wolfenstein.
good for me, i have a 970 and i'm also italian
digitalrelic
Banned
*whoosh*
VlaudTheImpaler
tl;dr
Que? That link says 1991 game but when I click on it all I get are a bunch of Quantum break textures... I thought QB was released this year.
NeoRaider
Member
What settings? Scaling on/off??
Nostremitus
Member
The UWP version ran better on AMD cards, not sure about the Steam version though.
Remember to turn on anisotropic filtering from drivers, in-game AF is console level texture filtering.
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/186127
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/186127
dgrdsv
Member
That's your explanation? Ok, I see. So you don't really know what you're talking about either, right?
They've been posted here already by other users, and they all are pretty good examples of games which actually look _better_ while running _several times faster_ on the same h/w - The Division, RoTTR, Battlefront, etc.
No, I don't think that it's even a tad hyperbolic as textures right now were textures back in 1991 as well.That's just a tad hyperbolic don't you think?
QB does have some advanced features which can be considered unique in modern games, but they're not what was posted above, they're in AO, GI, volumetric lighting departments. And the real problem is not that QB look bad, it's that it achieve its look in an inefficient way, meaning that they should've probably used other approaches to the said lighting calculations instead of the ones they've chosen which would likely give them close graphics quality but a lot more performance.
right
J3nga
Member
Scalling on, without it it's even worse. All other options pretty much maxed out, except for shadows6(medium), but it doesn't improve performance significantly going from high to medium.
NeoRaider
Member
^ That's horrible really. There's NO WAY i am buying this crap.
I know that. Steam version runs worse compared to the W10 version. I am not sure what were they doing really, this is unacceptable.
I know that. Steam version runs worse compared to the W10 version. I am not sure what were they doing really, this is unacceptable.
on amd cards only it seems
ambar_hitman
Member
Ok played it for 50 minutes or so.
Port is strictly okay.
I am playing everything on high/ultra at 1080p. Had to lock fps to 30 as it was fluctuating between 35-50-60 etc. With 30 its constant even during gun fights.
Scaling is ON. If its OFF, fps tanks to 20 etc.
Game itself is okay. Just got time powers so can't really comment on gameplay much. Controls feel very heavy though. Feels like I am controlling a tank.
PC specs:
AMD Phenom II 1055T
Zotac Nvidia GTX 1060 AMP!
8 GB RAM
Windows 10 anniversary update
Steam version of the game
Port is strictly okay.
I am playing everything on high/ultra at 1080p. Had to lock fps to 30 as it was fluctuating between 35-50-60 etc. With 30 its constant even during gun fights.
Scaling is ON. If its OFF, fps tanks to 20 etc.
Game itself is okay. Just got time powers so can't really comment on gameplay much. Controls feel very heavy though. Feels like I am controlling a tank.
PC specs:
AMD Phenom II 1055T
Zotac Nvidia GTX 1060 AMP!
8 GB RAM
Windows 10 anniversary update
Steam version of the game
icecold1983
Member
so at basically xbone settings a 1080 is performing 4x as well. not very impressive. is your 1080 overclocked?
its the same res as xbone. and i believe xbone has 1 or 2 settings above medium. textures and maybe 1 other
dgrdsv
Member
Heh.
The Steam version of the game do run better for me, and I can't help but feel that it's not only due to higher fps in DX11 but because the frametimes are more stable in exclusive fullscreen there.
Ultra preset (that's "high" on most options, not "ultra") + 2560x1600 seems like a solid >60 fps on my 1080. If I disable upscaling it goes down significantly, to ~45-50 but it is still pretty playable.
So far Steam version seems like a good one.
kaffeekranz
Member
You don't know what SSS is and talk about graphically 'impressive' features. Hilarious!
While I found QB's GI nice at times, I've mostly been distracted by the terribly overdone SSR.
Having such a physically inaccurate solution being this visible on pretty much every object was annoying.
Yes it's overclocked, I have some settings higher than xbox like shadows and texture filtering.
icecold1983
Member
Even more meh with the oc. Those settings are pretty inconsequential to perf tho
i was wondering the same. it's a big download so are they included with the steam version?
nope, no way to download them.