PS4 Pro PR has been terrible

Wanting a reason to feel good about not buying something most can't afford. Even at this cheap price some will feel left out due to funds.

lol

I didn't think about it, but it makes sense.

I could expect misinformation everywhere, but not here in GAF. Especially with such insistence.
 
Folks the PS4 Pro is not meant to be that big of a deal. Its main design concerns were compatability, minimum extra development needed over OG PS4, and price. It's mostly a nice little bump in graphical quality for those who have 4K HDR TVs. That's it. Stop bemoaning that it is not being pushed like a new console generation when every time Sony is asked, they go out of their way to say it in not a new console generation. It's a step up from the typical hard drive only space increase we normally get for a premium console. Period.
 
Folks the PS4 Pro is not meant to be that big of a deal. Its main design concerns were compatability, minimum extra development needed over OG PS4, and price. It's mostly a nice little bump in graphical quality for those who have 4K HDR TVs. That's it. Stop bemoaning that it is not being pushed like a new console generation when every time Sony is asked, they go out of their way to say it in not a new console generation. It's a step up from the typical hard drive only space increase we normally get for a premium console. Period.

Yes, let's start the new page with a big slice of misinforming bullshit.
 
True, on the other hand, it should be their job to actually have a lot of their own facts straight, but a lot of the time it seems like they contribute to the misinformation and not clarify it like what...gaming media is supposed to do

I most certainly agree with you there, though I think it depends on the context. If I interview a rep at Sony and they say something about PS4 Pro that isn't the full picture, it's not really my job to do the clarifying for them. However, if I'm writing the "definitive guide to the PS4 Pro", I would feel obligated to have a much fuller picture of what the console is and does.
 
Your making no sense. PS4 upscales or downscales to any resolution regardless of internal resolution. Why are you bringing PS3 into this?

But does it? Is there any game on PS4 that doesn't output at 1080p? As far as I know, games that run at 900p and whatnot handle the upscaling themselves, they don't rely on the PS4 OS to do it.

Well, I'm assuming it will. When quick switching between the PS4 menu and the game (running at 1080p) with the PS4 menu running in 4K, it'd be super weird to have your TV flicker to switch between resolutions every time you go into the PS4 menu.

Well, OG PS4 doesn't upscale to 4K currently :P

I guess you're right. I mean it should, but I also figured the Pro would positively affect non-Pro games and that didn't come to pass.
 
Folks the PS4 Pro is not meant to be that big of a deal. Its main design concerns were compatability, minimum extra development needed over OG PS4, and price. It's mostly a nice little bump in graphical quality for those who have 4K HDR TVs. That's it. Stop bemoaning that it is not being pushed like a new console generation when every time Sony is asked, they go out of their way to say it in not a new console generation. It's a step up from the typical hard drive only space increase we normally get for a premium console. Period.

Isn't it supposed to be like a new iPhone? Because Apple certainly makes a big deal about a new iteration.
 
Will Pro capture 4K screenshots and 1080p video? Or is the capture quality the same as PS4 standard?
 
So far I have seen zero printed advertising for the PS4 Pro in Sweden, a few articles on various sites, but it's barely noticable...

Still, that (probably) makes it easier to find one, just hope I'll get a decent package-deal on a new TV when I pick mine up :D
 
I agree that they have done a terrible job of upselling the benefits to 1080 owners. They're pushing 4K so hard. Personally I'd prefer better performance.

this. the 4k bullshit needs to stop. 1080p 60fps better games, better graphics is much better than shitty 30fps mediocre looking games at non native 4k.
 
Wanting a reason to feel good about not buying something most can't afford. Even at this cheap price some will feel left out due to funds.

I mean... no matter what I'm passing up, even if it's a good deal, I always feel good about the dollars I didn't spend. I don't think there is anything wrong with not seeing this as a must-have device because we don't have a list of changes for upcoming games on 1080p HDTVs.

All Sony needs to do is release a clear list of the different Pro-enhanced modes available for each game coming out (for 1080p displays, 4k TVs, and PSVR). The lack of such list is what I find to be terrible.

In other words: I know that it CAN super-sample games for a 1080p display. But I don't know which games that will actually apply to and that's where the communication has been terrible. Same thing goes for VR - we have no idea which games will get a boost in performance or clarity on Pro hardware.

We need a list.
 
I mean... no matter what I'm passing up, even if it's a good deal, I always feel good about the dollars I didn't spend. I don't think there is anything wrong with not seeing this as a must-have device because we don't have a list of changes for upcoming games on 1080p HDTVs.

All Sony needs to do is release a clear list of the different Pro-enhanced modes available for each game coming out (both for 1080p and 4k TVs). The lack of such list is what I find to be terrible.

In other words: I know that it CAN super-sample games for a 1080p display. But I don't know which games that will actually apply to and that's where the communication has been terrible.

I don't think anyone has ever argued that the PS4 Pro is a "must have" device. it clearly isn't
 
But does it? Is there any game on PS4 that doesn't output at 1080p? As far as I know, games that run at 900p and whatnot handle the upscaling themselves, they don't rely on the PS4 OS to do it.

I guess you're right. I mean it should, but I also figured the Pro would positively affect non-Pro games and that didn't come to pass.

I think the negative experience of the PS4P not upscaling is way more (directly) significant than the Pro not affecting non-Pro games (eg. my flickering TV example), so I really doubt it won't upscale non-patched games.

this. the 4k bullshit needs to stop. 1080p 60fps better games, better graphics is much better than shitty 30fps mediocre looking games at non native 4k.

Do you like video games?
 
No...it isn't.

This is the same realization that's dawned on me, as well.

The reason mid-gen refresh console threads get so many salty comments is clearly because the push is coming from two directions: fans of the competing console and fans of the non-enhanced base model that are concerned about spending more, but are also put off by being potentially "left behind."

That's a little different than basically saying all these poor people are being salty because they can't afford it. I wouldn't call the console "cheap" and I can 100% understand being torn between sticking with what you got and going for the upgrade. I think the bold above sounds perfectly reasonable. A mid-console refresh like this hasn't really been the norm.
 
this. the 4k bullshit needs to stop. 1080p 60fps better games, better graphics is much better than shitty 30fps mediocre looking games at non native 4k.

That's if the games are 1080p ~60fps already. If a game is running at 1080p 30fps, it'll be running 1080p 30fps on the Pro, with the possibility of higher fidelity through super sampling and an uptick in the "advanced video settings" if applicable.
 
I don't know about the rest of you but the wow factor for graphics in most game is gone for me, so as a current PS4 owner, I can care less about the PS4 Pro. Part of the reason why I'm hyped about Nintendo Switch, since I commute via mass transit the Switch makes sense for me to make it my primary console, games permitting. But at this point I don't care about graphics that much anymore. Sure, I'll appreciate great graphics but we are at the point of diminishing returns since last gen.

Now Scorpio I'm waiting for that as there are Xbox One exclusives I'm interested in and I think Microsoft shot the Xbox One S in the foot by showing off Scorpio, unless I find a very good deal on the One S.
 
I mean... no matter what I'm passing up, even if it's a good deal, I always feel good about the dollars I didn't spend. I don't think there is anything wrong with not seeing this as a must-have device because we don't have a list of changes for upcoming games on 1080p HDTVs.

All Sony needs to do is release a clear list of the different Pro-enhanced modes available for each game coming out (both for 1080p and 4k TVs). The lack of such list is what I find to be terrible.

In other words: I know that it CAN super-sample games for a 1080p display. But I don't know which games that will actually apply to and that's where the communication has been terrible.

All games going forward are required to support it so at the very minimum it will supersample all games coming out after launch. The only question is which games that have been released will eventually support it.
 
I agree that they have done a terrible job of upselling the benefits to 1080 owners. They're pushing 4K so hard. Personally I'd prefer better performance.

this. the 4k bullshit needs to stop. 1080p 60fps better games, better graphics is much better than shitty 30fps mediocre looking games at non native 4k.

Best case scenario IMO is that developers offer an option for both in-game. On the PC, we've had the option to choose our resolution to suit the framerate and graphical output of the game, it's time for console to finally start offering something like that on a broader scale for situations just like this.
 
I still think the Pro (NEO) was made to work with PSVR (Morpheus) and that to some extent all this 4k/HDR messaging mess came in response to the Scorpio E3 video getting so much positive response.

I think Sony felt they suddenly needed to be all about 4k and HDR as well. I mean, if it really was truly always meant to be a 4k machine, where is the UHD player? If HDR was really the future Sony had in mind, why can't the PSVR box pass through HDR?

Also it's amusing to see people go from native 1080p or bust to suddenly accepting of software upscaling to 4k being perfectly fine. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure the upscaling looks great, as do many 900p Xbox One games running at 1080p, but I find the sudden change in mentality now that Sony are the ones doing it hilarious.

It's also hilarious that PS4 is more powerful than Xbox One, PS4 Pro is more powerful than PS4 but now it's suddenly being more compared to Xbox One S than Scorpio because of the HDR/4k messaging.

Whoever said it earlier in this thread that people are going out of their way to be confused, nailed it. Yes, there are lots of questions about this new box but people are also going out of their way to make it seem confusing.

I think Sony's issue is how do you say the Pro is way better for PSVR without pissing off 44,000,000 PS4 owners who were told their systems would work perfectly with PSVR? At the same time, if they say the Pro really is what you need for PSVR then suddenly PSVR doubles in price. I have no doubt 4k/HDR tv owners will notice an improvement and I also think that 1080p owners will notice an improvement. The only question is which/how many games. With Microsoft also backing HDR and soon 4k, I think this is good news for PS4 Pro soon to be owners as 3rd party devs can include those features on both sides. 1st party stuff I assume will see enhancements at both resolutions.

At the end of the day, consoles are essentially specialized PCs (especially now running x86) and upgrading PCs almost always has benefits. Will it help every game? No, of course not. Will it end up being worth it if you game often on it? Almost certainly.

my 2 cents
 
They really have so far. I was hyped for it before they officially announced it. Since then, I went from day one to waiting for Horizon.
 
True, on the other hand, it should be their job to actually have a lot of their own facts straight, but a lot of the time it seems like they contribute to the misinformation and not clarify it like what...gaming media is supposed to do

Did you really expect anything else .
I mean just look at the start of this gen and how the media were ( very stupid \ wrong)

As for other people i still don't understand why they making things so hard.
It's a more powerful PS4 that is all there is to it.
If you have a 4k TV it will be better than the normal PS4 and if you stick to 1080p you get some benefits also .
 
Why? It makes sense to be against this machine if you don't like the iterative model.

Like it makes sense to be against same sex relationships if you're straight? Time to get some perspective and accept that the world is full of different people who like different things.

Back on the main topic: I don't think the PR campaign has really started. I expect screen shots to start arriving within the week and the real push to begin by this weekend.
 
I mean... no matter what I'm passing up, even if it's a good deal, I always feel good about the dollars I didn't spend. I don't think there is anything wrong with not seeing this as a must-have device because we don't have a list of changes for upcoming games on 1080p HDTVs.

All Sony needs to do is release a clear list of the different Pro-enhanced modes available for each game coming out (for 1080p displays, 4k TVs, and PSVR). The lack of such list is what I find to be terrible.

In other words: I know that it CAN super-sample games for a 1080p display. But I don't know which games that will actually apply to and that's where the communication has been terrible. Same thing goes for VR - we have no idea which games will get a boost in performance or clarity on Pro hardware.

We need a list.

Its not up to sony. its up to the developer. they are the ones dictating what modes it will support which are detailed on their MASSIVE FAQ. http://blog.us.playstation.com/2016/09/08/ps4-pro-the-ultimate-faq/
 
I've had no trouble finding out what I needed to about it personally, but tbh I don't know if there is any surefire way to properly market a console revision like this in a way to sell it to the average consumer.

Then again, I'm not someone who relies solely on PR for my information anyways, so...

Yeah. That is why I decided to wait and purchase Scorpio...Too much of the unknown. Can't be spending $400.

Got a good laugh out of this, cheers.

lol

I didn't think about it, but it makes sense.

I could expect misinformation everywhere, but not here in GAF.

Seriously? Why? I've come to expect it every time I see a thread about PS4 Pro pop up.
 
I still think the Pro (NEO) was made to work with PSVR (Morpheus) and that to some extent all this 4k/HDR messaging mess came in response to the Scorpio E3 video getting so much positive response.
They worked out all that 4K HDR and checkerboard shit in just a couple of months? Hot diggity!

I think Sony felt they suddenly needed to be all about 4k and HDR as well. I mean, if it really was truly always meant to be a 4k machine, where is the UHD player? If HDR was really the future Sony had in mind, why can't the PSVR box pass through HDR?

Also it's amusing to see people go from native 1080p or bust to suddenly accepting of software upscaling to 4k being perfectly fine. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure the upscaling looks great, as do many 900p Xbox One games running at 1080p, but I find the sudden change in mentality now that Sony are the ones doing it hilarious.
Don't go down this path. It leads nowhere and it's bullshit to begin with.

It's also hilarious that PS4 is more powerful than Xbox One, PS4 Pro is more powerful than PS4 but now it's suddenly being more compared to Xbox One S than Scorpio because of the HDR/4k messaging.

Whoever said it earlier in this thread that people are going out of their way to be confused, nailed it. Yes, there are lots of questions about this new box but people are also going out of their way to make it seem confusing.

I think Sony's issue is how do you say the Pro is way better for PSVR without pissing off 44,000,000 PS4 owners who were told their systems would work perfectly with PSVR? At the same time, if they say the Pro really is what you need for PSVR then suddenly PSVR doubles in price. I have no doubt 4k/HDR tv owners will notice an improvement and I also think that 1080p owners will notice an improvement. The only question is which/how many games. With Microsoft also backing HDR and soon 4k, I think this is good news for PS4 Pro soon to be owners as 3rd party devs can include those features on both sides. 1st party stuff I assume will see enhancements at both resolutions.
But...44 million PS4s DO work perfectly with PSVR....

At the end of the day, consoles are essentially specialized PCs (especially now running x86) and upgrading PCs almost always has benefits. Will it help every game? No, of course not. Will it end up being worth it if you game often on it? Almost certainly.

my 2 cents
There's some solid points there all in all, too :) But your post was too long not to split it up.
 
Well to be fair the answer to that question isn't as straightforward as say "How is this PC with twice the GPU power going to make my games look better?"

And there really isn't an answer anyway, as it depends on how the dev wants to use that extra power

That's pretty straightforward though. Every hardware upgrade is about how the developer wants to use the additional power.
 
you are...

At this point I'm thinking people are trolling because it can't be that hard to grasp here. I'm mean there's some logic that majority of people should have based on general common sense.

- Sony feels what Pro can accomplish is a big enough improvement to release now. It's logical to assume Pro games will look significantly better regardless of resolution

- PS4 has both Native and software scaled 4K titles

- First impressions are positive

- Small scale Indy and less demanding games will likely be native

- every generation before this, studios like ND, Gears Devs, or GG show us technically impressive games that are on much weaker hardware compared to PC, why would Pro be any different?

- At first everyone hated the idea of upgrading, now it's not a big enough upgrade because some games are checkerboard 4K and some are native? Does everyone on X1 feels like they are having such an inferior experience than on PS4? I don't think so... we are gravely exaggerating the real life difference between native and upscaled, if Sony new it looked so inferior, they likely wouldn't have released Pro. Why not wait till you see it in person?

Is there an article about Native 4K for PS4 Pro?

If so can you link it so I can read it?

Also a list of titles that will be released in Native 4K.
 
No, most of what comes out (in big games) will not be native 4K.
That does not mean there aren't games in 4K. There is a Neogaf thread.
Just addressing false information.
 
Yeah, don't know man. The information about how 1080p owners will benefit from this has been meager. That is why I'm holding off on it. I mean, in the long run getting the pro is definitely the way to go. As 4k tv's become more prevalent in the future and as more games exist that can take advantage of it for 1080p its value will probably be more evident, but right now I see absolutely no reason to upgrade as a 1080p owner.
 
To market it too heavily might lead people to think the PS4 standard/slim is playing second fiddle, with detrimental psychological effects on their existing user base.

Instead, being more conservative means standard/slim stays 'first fiddle' , VR keeps the spotlight, and this can slowly emerge as a 'luxury' alternative.

I think unless you are on a tight budget the Pro is a no brainier if you are buying a PS4. It's twice the power, possibly better loading times.

That power might only go to slightly increased fidelity, but that's the nature of graphics today,
 
preorder canceled

Preorder Not Canceled.


Sources so far seem to mention that yes it is likely that there will be performances boost for those choosing to go 1080P.

Most likely Framerate boot's from 30 to 60fps and a downsample from a Higher resolution giving us a crisper image quality .

Better texturing and better Shadows are also likely for Pro users running games at 1080P
 
Yeah, don't know man. The information about how 1080p owners will benefit from this has been meager. That is why I'm holding off on it. I mean, in the long run getting the pro is definitely the way to go. As 4k tv's become more prevalent in the future and as more games exist that can take advantage of it for 1080p its value will probably be more evident, but right now I see absolutely no reason to upgrade as a 1080p owner.

Shitposting time? (avatar joke) Seriously though, there's a lot of info on that in this thread.
 
The good old "you don't like it because you're too broke to buy it" argument is back

Grow up.
I don't think that's what people are saying. I do think it's natural that some people who are hesitant to purchase may be looking to justify that decision by being vocally negative on its value proposition.
 
Because it doesn't affect you if you don't want it?

Surely you are exaggerating your lack of understanding. When something you don't like becomes successful, ESPECIALLY in this industry, that thing will become the norm. Look at GTAO DLC. People who want single player DLC are dicked out of it because R* only wants the GTAO money. People who don't like the online component wouldn't have to worry about it if it didn't succeed.
 
I still don't really get why they're making the Pro.

I mean, the PS4 is selling great and I doubt that many people are switching from PS4 to PC due to graphics stagnation. My first thought was that they were doing it to push their 4K TVs, but the thing doesn't even have a 4K blu-ray player. I guess there's the VR hypothesis, but the base model PS4 seems to be doing a decent job.

I wonder which company came up with the half-gen upgrade idea first. I'm willing to bet that one of the machines was done in response to the other.
 
To me the PS4 Pro is like the opposite of appealing. I cannot find any reason to upgrade from XB1 (or PS4 if I had one) to a PS4 Pro. It won't have a UHD blu-ray disc drive. It's not powerful enough to do native 4k. I mean the console is guaranteed to be outclassed by the Scorpio which is coming out 1 year later. The idea that 4k checkerboard rendering should be classed as some sort of coveted asset is laughable to me. If checkerboard rendering is that big of a deal, then Scorpio will use checkerboard rendering too and have better performing games with extra bells and whistles across the board. If the gaming public demands native 4k and rejects scaled-up-4k, then Scorpio will be able to play native 4k games while the PS4 Pro won't be able to. Even if PS4 Pro ends up having a vast majority of its games running at native 4k, Scorpio will do the same and just have extra bells and whistles and better performance.

Every single hardware-level advantage for PS4 Pro is guaranteed to better on the Scorpio. There is no point to the console in my eyes.

The PS4 Pro also looks like a hideous console. Looks like a hamburger sandwich. Sorry just needed to get that all off my chest. But to be fair, we don't have any idea what Scorpio looks like. But judging from what the MS engineering team has done with XB1S, I wouldn't doubt Scorpio will look sleek and slick too.
 
Top Bottom