In the video he actually said exploration was great, that it wasn't ALL THAT, but it was better than the last game. That it still scratched an exploration itch that only Elden Ring scratched. All in all, aside from minor performance woes, the game sounds like an improvement across the board, which is good.
I did play Hogwarts at launch and wasnt rly super bad but I do have a high end PC, but 70 euro for 20 hours is i dunno. Wish it was longer considering that based on what people are saying, exploration is bad, again. I still dont like those animations.
Because 98% of these reviewers don't even play the game to enjoy it. They slap it in and make a baseline review from the 5 hours they spent with it. Reviews are shit unless the person actually play through the entire game and tried most of the things in it.
AAA gaming "incentivizes" to get reviews on board to push sales.
Thats how I played the first game way back in 2019. EA has released 2 Battlefield games while EA Play Pro has been around, 3 NFS games, and several other big AAA games like Dead Space. They dont care if you cancel after a month.Who is ready for a tin-foil hat theory on PC performance:
You can play this game as part of EA Play Pro on PC. So, you could plop down $14.99 play this for three days, finish the story, then cancel your sub until another EA game comes out you want to play on PC.
The same thing was the case for Wild Hearts (which was fun on console and....less than that on PC) and Calisto Protocol.
Yeah...but you have to have the EA app installed and running when you play the steam version of the game. That was how it worked for Fallen Order IIRC.Not on steam tho
You right you right! Fixed!!
What's your theory? You think ea would rather you spend $15 than $70???Who is ready for a tin-foil hat theory on PC performance:
You can play this game as part of EA Play Pro on PC. So, you could plop down $14.99 play this for three days, finish the story, then cancel your sub until another EA game comes out you want to play on PC.
The same thing was the case for Wild Hearts (which was fun on console and....less than that on PC). *edited to remove some erroneous click bait
Nah, my theory is they don't have any incentive to make the PC version of the game great. The console market is where they will make their money, the PC version is there to placate a smaller group of players.
Are the pics from the pc version maxed out?My review with lots of 4K screenshots @ max settings: https://www.pcmrace.com/2023/04/26/star-wars-jedi-survivor-review/
Awful optimizacion on PC, sadly. Still a 9/10 for me.
http://www.pcmrace.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/JediSurvivor_2023_04_20_01_00_10_085.jpg
Cerny IO is irrelevent when this had to be made feature-par with Series S...
What hate? I have a 4080, i'm gonna play the game better than 95% of people on this planet, but it still looks mid for a nextgen only title maxed out on pc, sorry not sorry dude.
this game was designed as cross gen game so it doesnt really take advantage of the IO , they eventualy decided to cancel last gen versions
A tale as old as time, but it's understandable, everyone has their own opinion. I mean even now, it should say a lot that even with some PC performance woes, people are saying that this game is better than the previous in every way, and a great experience all around.
