gradient
Resident Cheap Arse
Some folks just put up a pic of Charlie with RIP in it. No text, no commentary. Are they happy he is dead, or are they sad? Are they just marking the event? Either way, it's how everyone should approach it. No virtue signaling, no pandering to your "base", either say something simple/neutral or just STFU.
Had he died in a car accident or blew out an aneurysm then -maybe- some of the more crass jokes could fly. But to have someone murdered in the middle of public discourse, the very foundation of our society.....that's so far beyond the line even the more cold hearted and ruthless hater of Kirk's should have had their spidey-sense tingling as they reached for their phone to gloat. Hell, I bet a fair number of lefty types had their phones physically grabbed out of their little paws by their PR managers ("No, NO! Bad Dog!) to prevent them from making an odious comment and today they should give them all raises for saving them from themselves.
I agree and I don't.
To show respect and empathy for his death is the right thing to do, but many, if not most, of the people positing about it are doing it for engagement. To garner clicks, like and attention. Those that post it in a mocking way seek to appeal to their likeminded social circle who also disliked him, and many of those that post in reverance or outrage to his death do so in an effort to appeal to and garner the attention of those who feel similarily hurt and outraged by the atrocity.
It's a machine. A twisted machine that incentivises outrage and content that draws attention by any means possible. Most people don't even realise they're a cog in it, they just fall into the workings and become another cog in the machine.
This isn't to say all outrage and sentiment expressed is disingenuous, but regardless of the intent, the social media companies benefit from the heightened response, conflict and interactions that it brings.