I don't watch but great!
this liberal is bit lost, and she can't even pronounce Jesus properly
this liberal is bit lost, and she can't even pronounce Jesus properly
They need reform really bad imo. But I think there is a divide in the party, like we're seeing in NYC, that will be tough to move past.remember when the Clinton administration gave us free trade, welfare reform, "don't ask don't tell", and a balanced budget? The fuck happened to this party?
Also the biggest scandal of the decade was Clinton lying about getting a blowjob from his intern. Seems so quaint by today's standards.
Don't forget love of violent crime and criminals, antisemitism, love of islam (even the lgbt lefties love it despite it not being very reciprocal). I guess we could sum it up by using the word "evil".Hate. Racism
You underestimate their idiocy. They are now seriously claiming that Disney has defended their freedom of speech for commercial reasons. With only one if - if Kimmel will mock Trump in the next show.Now what? All the "We are Jimmy Kimmel" people won't backtrack from criticizing this as a Trump sicking the FCC on them? So it's not fascism?
Love of Islam. Only because if they knock it they'll get the shit beat of of them.Don't forget love of violent crime and criminals, antisemitism, love of islam (even the lgbt lefties love it despite it not being very reciprocal). I guess we could sum it up by using the word "evil".
Never knew Jesus is Latino.
this liberal is bit lost, and she can't even pronounce Jesus properly
I've seent the light
I've seent the light
There is a big difference in passing a bill that simply states that congress is against political violence and one that makes a national holiday in remembrance of the deceased.
This is really not the same
This resolution (1) condemns the assassination of Charles "Charlie" James Kirk and all forms of political violence; and (2) honors the life, leadership, and legacy of Charlie Kirk.
This resolution condemns the June 14, 2025, attacks on Minnesota state legislators and calls on all people in the United States to reaffirm our commitment to a safe, civil, and peaceful democracy.
The resolution also honors (1) the lives of Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark Hortman who were killed, (2) Senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette Hoffman who were critically injured, and (3) the law enforcement officers who rapidly responded to the attacks and apprehended the suspected perpetrator.
The House adopted a resolution honoring the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk and condemning political violence in a largely bipartisan vote Friday that appeared to prove difficult for Democrats.
The vote was 310-58, with 95 Democrats supporting the resolution, which was brought forward by Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) nine days after Kirk, a conservative activist, was fatally shot during an open-air rally in Utah.
Thirty-eight Democrats voted "present," and 58 voted "no."
Doesn't pertain to every crazy out there because some will be nuts no matter what.This is easy to reply: their hatred towards the western society. That's why they defend whatever natural enemy of the west: anticolonial movements, "antiracism" (meaning, it's ok to hate on whites and jews), antimilitarism (so the nation is weaker against its enemies), Islam (as opposed to christianism and the biggest threat in the world right now); feminism and transgenderism (as opposition to the men who lead society).
Whatever brings down the pilars of our society fits in that ideological Frankestein monster they have become.
And this is why their manifestations are violent. They are not pro anything. It's a nihilist movement with no purpose other than destruction. The tragedy is that most of them don't even realize how badly they are being played. The global left has been hijacked by anti-west fanatics who must be kicked out of public life. People who want to destroy your society has no place in politics. It's that simple.
Ah you are totally right. In general I dislike these pointless bills anyways but voting against something like this feels so pointless.Neither Bill was for a National Holiday. You are misinformed.
Charlie Kirk Resolution: H.Res.719
Melissa Hortman Resolution: H.Res.519
Source
You are confusing the "National Day of Remembrance Resolution" for Charlie Kirk, which is totally separate.
S.Res.403
Both of the Resolutions I posted (The unanimous resolution for Hortman and and the non-unanimous Kirk Resolution), are in essence, the same thing.
Ah you are totally right. In general I dislike these pointless bills anyways but voting against something like this feels so pointless.
All this politicisation of Charlie Kirk's death is paying off.From CNN today
![]()
I forget his name, but that poll guy on CNN is hilarious because he stands out so much. The channel is so left wing, but amazing they let him show his polls which often show Dems in a bad light. Youd think they yank him from showing it.All this politicisation of Charlie Kirk's death is paying off.
He's pretty much obliged to come out and at least do a joke about Trump.It was a bad move in the first place and it shouldn't have been done.
Let's see if he's muzzled by ABC or allowed full creative Liberty to say what he wants.
Because both things can't, and wouldn't, be correct. Evil government overstepping agencies trying to destroy the bill of rights don't just let things happen.
The move to suspend him temporarily was smart, the comment from FCC was dumb.It was a bad move in the first place and it shouldn't have been done.
Let's see if he's muzzled by ABC or allowed full creative Liberty to say what he wants.
Almost, the lefties wait how hard he will mock Trump next. And if there will be no "hard way" after, then it's correct. There is also a possibility that they are doing this because they have nothing left to lose.So can we admit that the first scenario for the banning likely wasn't correct?
Seems completely unnecessary for this game of telephone to be the cause of anything. "ABC" doesn't send the show out into the world, broadcasters do that, and they said they dropped the show. The ABC part came after. ABC can actually pay Jimmy to do a show and it's possible for nobody to see it. The only thing that I saw on this was the FCC head saying that you can't mislead the public on public airwaves when he was asked a question about it, but the FCC doesn't need to do anything if the broadcaster decides the show isn't worth it of their own volition.No they don't, but the fact that various political personalities from the Republican party criticized FCC for this as well likely had something to do with them loosening this up.
I don't think anyone is making the argument that the FCC forced ABC to remove Kimmel. It seems much more nuanced than that.Just to make sure I have this:
The evil FCC stepped in at the instructions of the president personally, and said to ban Jimmy or else, no other possible way the banning could have happened, no other mechanism.
And ABC here just tells the FCC to go fuck themselves and the FCC throws their hands up like aw shucks they got us
Because both things can't, and wouldn't, be correct. Evil government overstepping agencies trying to destroy the bill of rights don't just let things happen.
So can we admit that the first scenario for the banning likely wasn't correct? And it was exactly what the broadcaster company said right at the start, and for good reason.
No they don't, but the fact that various political personalities from the Republican party criticized FCC for this as well likely had something to do with them loosening this up.
No they don't, but the fact that various political personalities from the Republican party criticized FCC for this as well likely had something to do with them loosening this up.
Not sure this is the place but I don't think Turning Point is going to work out under Erika just look at Jones town, Branch Davidians, Heaven's Gate.
Starting to think your ex-wife was the sane one.Not sure this is the place but I don't think Turning Point is going to work out under Erika just look at Jones town, Branch Davidians, Heaven's Gate. Did she even have a position in the organization prior to Charlie's assassination? She doesn't have his personality to carry the organization forward imo.
Are you really trying to equate Turning Point to those wacko suicidal groups?
No, I was pointing out that those groups fell apart without their respective leaders. but I think turning point is very founder centric and relies heavily on Kirk's charisma and personality.Are you really trying to equate Turning Point to those wacko suicidal groups?
This is what it looks like on a 5 year basis. That's a pretty small drop all things considered.This might have had something to do with it too?
![]()
Lots of organisations and companies succeed in going from personality-driven to institution-driven. Time will tell.No, I was pointing out that those groups fell apart without their respective leaders. but I think turning point is very founder centric and relies heavily on Kirk's charisma and personality.
Exactly, that was my only point. I don't care one way or another anything about Jimmy or his show. For being a fascist anti-first amendment group of folks they sure don't understand how to censor people very well. They might want to browse Reddit or Era for a while.Probably was a factor. But it needs to be pointed out that none of this is how censorship and fascism work. Not that you said otherwise.
I hope my American brothers are safe. I fear for their safety reading shit like this. (The comments)
Businesses yes, but they have a board of directors, they have talent acquisition people etc and aren't reliant on personallity.This is what it looks like on a 5 year basis. That's a pretty small drop all things considered.
![]()
Lots of organisations and companies succeed in going from personality-driven to institution-driven. Time will tell.
No, I was pointing out that those groups fell apart without their respective leaders. but I think turning point is very founder centric and relies heavily on Kirk's charisma and personality.
I think he's talking about influence and charisma. Not comparing them apples to oranges.
reddit freaks like these commenters are exactly who Tyler Robinson was (or is... but soon, hopefully, he'll be in the past tense)