• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

London 2012 Summer Olympics |OT|

Status
Not open for further replies.
The reason why you can compare the swimming strokes and not compared the field and other track events is look at the bodies of the athletes. Swimmers who do the shorter distances all look the same. Track is far more specialized.
 
How often does a Decathlon athlete perform well enough to medal in individual events?

If it was possible for them to compete in both the decathlon and all the other events simultaneously without dying, or if the decathlon followed the "one event per day" scheme, that number would probably be pretty respectable.

except not. top 10 olympic medalist has 4 swimmers.

lol

Whatever, man.
 
Ha, my BBC stream's are buffering like crazy now too... bet they're probably getting killed from all the extra Americans/Canadians hopping on to watch.

It's perfectly fine in the UK. I've got 4/5 streams all running in HD at the same time. It's probably the VPNs and stuff being used are buckling under the weight.
 
The reason why you can compare the swimming strokes and not compared the field and other track events is look at the bodies of the athletes. Swimmers who do the shorter distances all look the same. Track is far more specialized.

This. I'm not saying it doesn't take hard work and skill to master the different strokes but the degree of specialization in the track and field events are much higher. And the sport is much more accessible so I'm going to have my bias for it admittedly.
 
If it was possible for them to compete in both the decathlon and all the other events simultaneously without dying, or if the decathlon followed the "one event per day" scheme, that number would probably be pretty respectable.

I always thought of decathletes as being failed track and field athletes, to be honest.

Kind of how shit tennis players go over to doubles.
 
This. I'm not saying it doesn't take hard work and skill to master the different strokes but the degree of specialization in the track and field events are much higher. And the sport is much more accessible so I'm going to have my bias for it admittedly.

nobody thinks winning 8 gold medals is easy but it is proximately a 1000 time easier than winning 8 track and field medals in one year.
 
Hey guys, I have a question I hope someone can answer. So I'm watching Olympic soccer and it got me wondering just how seriously the teams were taking the games. I mean, I imagine winning the World Cup is the penultimate goal of a soccer player, not winning the gold medal. Similarly, the U.S. basketball team will (presumably?) care little for getting a gold medal as much as they do winning the NBA Finals.

So exactly how seriously are the Olympics taken when the sport is superseded by a professional sports league? Is anyone going to risk playing injured when they need to be 100% a year or two from now?
 
And why does that matter?

In talking about who was more impressive in 2008, it matters because sane people will say it is Bolt. Bolt does not have the build for a 100m yet he massacred the competition and made people look stupid and then beat a record that many thought would not be broken in the 200.
 
It's really dumb to compare. You'd have to invent some sort of metric to scale/normalize the two and even then people would just complain about the weights of the parameters.
 
Hey guys, I have a question I hope someone can answer. So I'm watching Olympic soccer and it got me wondering just how seriously the teams were taking the games. I mean, I imagine winning the World Cup is the penultimate goal of a soccer player, not winning the gold medal. Similarly, the U.S. basketball team will (presumably?) care little for getting a gold medal as much as they do winning the NBA Finals.

So exactly how seriously are the Olympics taken when the sport is superseded by a professional sports league? Is anyone going to risk playing injured when they need to be 100% a year or two from now?

Men's soccer teams are Under 23 with 3 older players. So it's not the same teams as the World/Continental cups.
 
In talking about who was more impressive in 2008, it matters because sane people will say it is Bolt. Bolt does not have the build for a 100m yet he massacred the competition and made people look stupid and then beat a record that many thought would not be broken in the 200.

That was not his point. His point was that "swimming is ridiculous" because they award medals for "swimming backwards".

too many too similar events.

Why do you care? You don't have to watch them all.
 
When lifting I was always told to not lock my joints but these poor men and woman got to lock their arms with so much weight. Jesus.
 
Hey guys, I have a question I hope someone can answer. So I'm watching Olympic soccer and it got me wondering just how seriously the teams were taking the games. I mean, I imagine winning the World Cup is the penultimate goal of a soccer player, not winning the gold medal. Similarly, the U.S. basketball team will (presumably?) care little for getting a gold medal as much as they do winning the NBA Finals.

So exactly how seriously are the Olympics taken when the sport is superseded by a professional sports league? Is anyone going to risk playing injured when they need to be 100% a year or two from now?

Well, they're not proper football teams playing. It's under 23's with three senior players.

As in 'how serious is it being taken', depends on the team.
 
Hey guys, I have a question I hope someone can answer. So I'm watching Olympic soccer and it got me wondering just how seriously the teams were taking the games. I mean, I imagine winning the World Cup is the penultimate goal of a soccer player, not winning the gold medal. Similarly, the U.S. basketball team will (presumably?) care little for getting a gold medal as much as they do winning the NBA Finals.

So exactly how seriously are the Olympics taken when the sport is superseded by a professional sports league? Is anyone going to risk playing injured when they need to be 100% a year or two from now?

The USA basketball team cares about winning a gold pretty much just because they will be made fun of forever if they lose it. Especially after the team's comments about thinking they are better then the Dream Team.

I assume that the Soccer suffers from the same problem the Basketball team has though, in that superstars don't want to play for such little money with such a high risk of being injured.

Well, they're not proper football teams playing. It's under 23's with three senior players.

As in 'how serious is it being taken', depends on the team.

That explains a lot. I remember being stunned when the USA team didn't make it. That would explain it. Our pipeline for young talent isn't exactly super awesome.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom