London 2012 Summer Olympics |OT3|

Status
Not open for further replies.
what a wonderful few weeks it has been. usa dominates the olympics, lands curiosity on mars, and the gods honor us with perseids meteor shower.
 
Not really, given the restrictions on the football tournament. I'm surprised they don't do a similar thing for basketball.

GQ talked about this recently.

It was always a silly rule. According to international basketball guidelines in place for decades, professionals from leagues all over the world could compete for their countries at the Olympics -- but NBA players could not. The effect was to balance out America's towering advantage in the sport. You know give the poor bastards a chance. The rule was dropped in April 1989 though, after the United States finished a humiliating third at the previous summer's Olympics in Seoul. Parity, everyone learned, wasn't nearly as captivating as dominance. And make no mistake: Dominating was as important as winning. The idea was to dazzle, to put on a display of American might so awe-inspiring that the best our rivals could hope for was a silver medal. Or even better, Michael Jordan's autograph.

(the truth is the NBA did not and does not want to participate. The US and Russia voted against the rule change)
 
But the best boxers and footballers aren't allowed to compete for some reason.

Not so sure about the boxers, but im sure the euro teams wouldnt want to play in the Olympics a week or so after the Euro championships, a week or 2 before the leagues start, and when qualifying for the Champions and europa leagues.
 
Yawn.

Please don't post again 10 pages full of moronic "America is the best" "You only win because of swimming" "Salty" "Why are you even trying, World?"-comments.

It was horrible yesterday.
 
Tennis has the 4 slams. What's your point?

They are completely different sports and scenarios. I don't really know why you think this is relevant.

The four slams are different tournaments, played on various surfaces. Having the Olympics with the four slams isn't as redundant as having the World Cup, than two years later, the Olympic games.

Not to mention that we would than be asking European players to play the Euro tournament, then the Olympics, right after one another. (I understand that Tennis players do this, but once again, different sports, different levels of fitness, etc).

Soccer has enough elite level-international trophy's.
 
If you count the number of citizens its true. Its pretty obvious america has more medals considered the amount of people that are living there.

So what about India and China, which each have 3x as many people as we do? Only factoring in population is pretty silly.
 
CHARA.jpg


I was thinking more like the last two on the right.


http://media.photobucket.com/image/recent/charyui/MechStuff/Zeon03.png
 
Not so sure about the boxers, but im sure the euro teams wouldnt want to play in the Olympics a week or so after the Euro championships, a week or 2 before the leagues start, and when qualifying for the Champions and europa leagues.
Simply put, the age restriction for football is because FIFA told the IOC to fuck off
 
Okay, looks like the insecure underachievers are now trying to live vicariously through this thread.

All rational posters, bail out!
 
I have to say, I love watching lots of obscure sports like table tennis, horse dancing and basketball for a few weeks. Its such a nice change from the usual. :-)
 
The Olympics are about the world's BEST atheltes competing. I'm sorry you can't handle the fact that our best basketball players are the best in the world.

Well its not really the world best athletes when in most sports you can't field professorial players.

Would also like to say that the teams for Olympic Football (soccer) is like Team C for countries. People wonder why the top euro teams never made it, because you can't field your best players because of the rules and restrictions in place which are:-

"The men’s competition will be an under-23s event, but each country will be allowed to select three older players."

Always wondered why the Olympics place rules in one sport and not in another, shit should all be universal.

You guys think America would be as strong if they used the same rules as applied for Olympic Football (soccer) which would be only one older player when you think percentage wise due to squad size.

I kind of find it stupid you can't field your strongest players and why Olympic Football (soccer) is not cared for at all in mostly Europe, for some reason people really care in south american countries for it though.
 
Hey. I thought we did a good job of hosting the Olympics.

And everyone did a great job of taking part. Including the USA.

Is that something a few people here can agree with?
 
Can't wait for Pentathlon running/shooting combined event.

This boxing's pretty good, but the officiating's apparently been weird according to my announcer. Haven't been watching long so I'm wondering what happened before.
 
I have to say, I love watching lots of obscure sports like table tennis, horse dancing and basketball for a few weeks. Its such a nice change from the usual. :-)

Yeah. I prefer it if they was more than that and less stuff like the tedious football and basketball tournaments. Especially when one is completely hobbled and the other only has one country that's ever likely to win.
 
Those wanting tickets for the para-olympics may be to late, tried to get some last week and its pretty much sold out, unless they are with holding tickets till after these games have finished.
 
Those wanting tickets for the para-olympics may be to late, tried to get some last week and its pretty much sold out, unless they are with holding tickets till after these games have finished.

The ticket website says this.

"Paralympic Games tickets
Watch out for more Paralympic Games tickets which will go on sale next week following the close of the Olympic Games."
 
Lol, comparing Europe medals to American medals. Just how many participants in each event is one 'nation' allowed? A EU would only be able to send a fraction of the competitors. Use your brains, kids.
 
So what about India and China, which each have 3x as many people as we do? Only factoring in population is pretty silly.

India is one of the poorest countries in the world though.

Population is hugely relevant among rich nations. Just take all the gold medals won by the richest countries in europe and add them up. That gets around having more than one team per event, and this team euro would win more events while investing about the same per capita. A greater population with more diverse facilities would make team euro more competitive in more events than any of its constituent nations.

An alternative is to have goverment pump loads of money into olympic sports as a show of strength. Like China and Russia in the past.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom