Sony's software brilliance still isn't enough ( gamesindustry.biz )

They handled that... well??? What?

I don't understand your post but, what I was trying to say was that whenever my PS1/PS2 broke, I had to pay. With MS, they paid shipping, handling and repairs and I also got some points or a game thrown in so too me, yes they handled that well.
 
I don't understand your post but, what I was trying to say was that whenever my PS1/PS2 broke, I had to pay. With MS, they paid shipping, handling and repairs and I also got some points or a game thrown in so too me, yes they handled that well.

Had my launch ps2 fixed for free in 2003 with a DRE. I've had three separate 360s RROD, one of them twice. Anecdotal evidence doesn't mean much.

"You know, things break."

I just received a PM from Tarrasque threatening to follow me from thread to thread until he can "get me banned". Dude has got some intense feelings.
.
Wow, thats insanity. I disagree with almost everything you have said here, but I have a feeling you will be around longer than him.
 
I was going to disagree, but that actually fits with what Kaz said. Divisions doing whatever the hell they wanted and then releasing stuff without concern of how it would be received. As well as how badly they treated (or ignored) third party devs for the first couple of years. I remember old 1UP Yours podcasts on which devs were talking about how they were getting tons of dev support from Microsoft, but Sony wouldnt provide anyone to assist them. Can file both of those issues under arrogance for sure.

My point stands that the new Sony is much better as compared to the Sony in 2006.

They have made good decisions with the PS3 and it will help them in the long run.

Most of points people bringing here were once true or is just blatant trolling.
 
22990434.jpg
 
Had my launch ps2 fixed for free in 2003 with a DRE. I've had three separate 360s RROD, one of them twice. Anecdotal evidence doesn't mean much.

"You know, things break."


Wow, thats insanity. I disagree with almost everything you have said here, but I have a feeling you will be around longer than him.

I received more hate mail from him stating I misrepresented him. He's right, he didn't specifically say he would personally do it, he said:

"Enjoy being followed from thread to thread till you eventually shoot yourself in the foot and get banned."

Also called me some rather choice names sprinkled liberally with expletives. I don't think we should be sending each other PMs such as this. It's not very civil, not to mention downright depressing as a gamer that if you state an opinion that someone else disagrees with they spew venom at you as if you'd just insulted a loved one. I don't get it.

My point stands that the new Sony is much better as compared to the Sony in 2006.

They have made good decisions with the PS3 and it will help them in the long run.

Most of points people bringing here were once true or is just blatant trolling.

I think it's still OK to legitimately question Sony's vision lately because of the Vita. Releasing it at that price with no memory cards is pretty absurd, especially when you consider that most games wont even play if you dont have a memory card installed. It's no longer the dumbest thing I've seen though, because Nintendo recently followed that up by selling the XL in Europe without a means to charge the thing. Maybe I'm just completely out of touch with "regular" consumers, but it seems to me stuff like that would rub them the wrong way.
 
My point is that for most people the RROD is absolutely inexcusable and was not handled well at all. Especially at first.
"You know, things break" is a quote from Peter Moore when he was with MS trying to downplay the issue.


I didn't say it was excusable, I said they handled it well. I know where the quote came from but if we're going to start pulling out quotes that didn't vibe well with the consumer then Sony definately takes that cake.

Anyway, time to break in my new arcade stick.
 
Threads like this just make me SMH. Some of you (meaning a lot of you) are way too attached to one particular company. It's now considered trolling to have a opinion on a product you own? Amazing. Also why do you care if someone has a negative opinion on the Almighty Sony? Do you work for them? Do have have shares in them? Or are you just a child? If a company does right by me, I don't care that's their job, that's what they are supposed to do. I don't become their white knights and viral marketing fanboys.

Every thread lately this happens. What's wrong with you people?

This post is so ironic.

Lets see(clears throat)

Threads like this make me SMH. Some of you(meaning a lot of you) are way to attached to try and shit on one company. Its now considered not trolling to go into every thread about Sony, regardless of the subject and post the same unrelated and biased drivel and try to quantify it by the fact that you supposedly own one of their products? Also why do you care if someone has a positive opinion of the Amazingly Shitty Sony? Do you work for MS? Do you have shares in them? Or are you just a troll?

Every Sony thread lately this happens. What is wrong with you people?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Spare me the BS please.
 
I didn't say it was excusable, I said they handled it well. I know where the quote came from but if we're going to start pulling out quotes that didn't vibe well with the consumer then Sony definately takes that cake.

Anyway, time to break in my new arcade stick.
Well of course.
 
The fact that the console launched at a (frankly ludicrous) $500 price point doesn't matter. It's six years old, and people don't want to pay $249 for a six year old piece of hardware

Yeah! He's right! I want my 2006 Ferrari f430 at the mass market price. It's 6 years old damnit!

Ridiculous claim. The market will dictate the price. If people stop buying at the price Sony is asking for it, they will correct it. If they don't, they dig their own grave. It seems that they are quite satisfied at the current price point though. I believe that they will adjust it at TGS or maybe at E3.
 
Too many AA IPs and not enough AAA IPs. They're throwing everything at the wall to see what will stick and become their Halo or what have you.

Their exclusive software library is mighty impressive and diverse though, much more so than their competitors, it just doesn't seem to bring the same return with rising development costs.
 
I'll never get why they aren't discounting the 160 GB PS3, which retails for 249 EUR, when the 320 GBP version only costs 200 EUR. Butility then they also don't have any serious competition in Europe at the moment.
 
Too many AA IPs and not enough AAA IPs. They're throwing everything at the wall to see what will stick and become their Halo or what have you.

Their exclusive software library is mighty impressive and diverse though, much more so than their competitors, it just doesn't seem to bring the same return with rising development costs.

proof?
 
lol @ everyone hating on Daydream Sequence. The man speaks the truth, people.

This whole experience reminds me of the Dreamcast situation just before Sega pulled the plug. Man, we Sega fans cried bitter tears, let me tell you. But life goes on. I'm sitting in my office. I have a Saturn permanently connected to a small CRT TV in the corner of the room. Turning it on gives me a warm feeling. But I don't dwell on the past and what might have been. Just move on. Enjoy what you got out of Sony but realise that it is probably over.

Nintendo, OUYA and likely Microsoft will be around next gen. Take your pick. Continue having fun. Don't get caught up emotionally. Hardware makers come and go. It's how this industry works.
 
Too many AA IPs and not enough AAA IPs. They're throwing everything at the wall to see what will stick and become their Halo or what have you.

Their exclusive software library is mighty impressive and diverse though, much more so than their competitors, it just doesn't seem to bring the same return with rising development costs.

I personally feel the same about sony ip.
I bought the ps3 for killzone and uncharted franchise which i consider sony's halo,gears so to speak as in AAA quality.

But i just sold my ps3 not really interested in upcoming titles. Only reason i still have a 360 is because im a big halo fan and with halo 4 coming out this year im not selling it yet depends how long i can keep playing halo 4 on and off. And the other exclusive titles their are better multiplat titles that excel at what they do.

BTW im done with this gen for 2 years already.
/Come on next gen please next year.
 
lol @ everyone hating on Daydream Sequence. The man speaks the truth, people.

This whole experience reminds me of the Dreamcast situation just before Sega pulled the plug. Man, we Sega fans cried bitter tears, let me tell you. But life goes on. I'm sitting in my office. I have a Saturn permanently connected to a small CRT TV in the corner of the room. Turning it on gives me a warm feeling. But I don't dwell on the past and what might have been. Just move on. Enjoy what you got out of Sony but realise that it is probably over.

Nintendo, OUYA and likely Microsoft will be around next gen. Take your pick. Continue having fun. Don't get caught up emotionally. Hardware makers come and go. It's how this industry works.

Did you just count Sony out for next gen? Why so silly?
 
lol @ everyone hating on Daydream Sequence. The man speaks the truth, people.

This whole experience reminds me of the Dreamcast situation just before Sega pulled the plug. Man, we Sega fans cried bitter tears, let me tell you. But life goes on. I'm sitting in my office. I have a Saturn permanently connected to a small CRT TV in the corner of the room. Turning it on gives me a warm feeling. But I don't dwell on the past and what might have been. Just move on. Enjoy what you got out of Sony but realise that it is probably over.

Nintendo, OUYA and likely Microsoft will be around next gen. Take your pick. Continue having fun. Don't get caught up emotionally. Hardware makers come and go. It's how this industry works.

you think Ouya will survive over Sony?
 
This post is so ironic.

Lets see(clears throat)

Threads like this make me SMH. Some of you(meaning a lot of you) are way to attached to try and shit on one company. Its now considered not trolling to go into every thread about Sony, regardless of the subject and post the same unrelated and biased drivel and try to quantify it by the fact that you supposedly own one of their products? Also why do you care if someone has a positive opinion of the Amazingly Shitty Sony? Do you work for MS? Do you have shares in them? Or are you just a troll?

Every Sony thread lately this happens. What is wrong with you people?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Spare me the BS please.

Nathan-Fillion-reaction-gif.gif


First time ever i've being called a Microsoft fanboy. I own everything and i shit on everyone equally, even Valve, Apple and the big 3 console makers. I hold no alliance to any company, soon as i do i loose as a consumer and gamer. I'm master race brother.
 
What brilliance? Their only brilliant piece of software is GT. Everything else is either half assed (LBP is a garbage platformer) or some linear movie style "game" that's immediately forgotten.
 
That's incorrect. Take the Ratchet and Clank series. On PS2 the US sales of each game was more than the total of Europe and Japan combined(or close to it). On the PS3 versions US sales are below Europe for each Ratchet game. Sony cares very much about this. If they don't, they're fools.
If I remember correctly last gen, R&C games barely sold well enough to become GH games. Once they became GH games, that's when sales started going up because many people are cheap (want to buy $20 games). That's the way most SCEA games got sales in NA that weren't SOCOM, God of War, etc.
 
Jesus Christ people!

Why don't you all just bring back your Sony Defense Force avatars and get it over with.
This shit is getting beyond annoying.

"Oh, no something negative is posted about Sony! Let's all cling together and attack everyone and everything we don't like in the name of our lord and saviour!"

SMH
 
GT5 did not outsell Gears in America and Uncharted in America is NOWHERE near Gears. Don't know what crack you're smoking to even suggest such a thing.

I don't care about discussing Europe, as I know Sony does do better there. But there's something with their games that are just not appealing to America.

IN AMERICA, how do you not see your repeated fault throughout your entire post.

The world is much much bigger than America, and in worldwide sales yes all these games stand toe-to-toe
 
I fail to see how Sony make brilliant software imo, Resistance, Killzone, Infamous are all average at best with Infamous being above average. There are way better alternatives to most of the games they have made this gen.

For me the only truly great exclusives they have put out are Valkryia Chronicles which was done by a 3rd party, and Ratchet and Clank A Crack in Time. Demons Souls is probably the best out of the lot.
 
Jesus Christ people!

Why don't you all just bring back your Sony Defense Force avatars and get it over with.
This shit is getting beyond annoying.

"Oh, no something negative is posted about Sony! Let's all cling together and attack everyone and everything we don't like in the name of our lord and saviour!"

SMH

Posts like this are annoying to.

"Why doesn't anybody let us shit up every Sony thread?"

I fail to see how Sony make brilliant software imo, Resistance, Killzone, Infamous are all average at best with Infamous being above average. There are way better alternatives to most of the games they have made this gen.

For me the only truly great exclusives they have put out are Valkryia Chronicles which was done by a 3rd party, and Ratchet and Clank A Crack in Time. Demons Souls is probably the best out of the lot.

Well that would be your opinion. There are alot of people who feel the opposite...
 

Also, I'm still waiting for custom soundtracks on all PS3 games...
or a Pandora app, considering how much of an annoyance it is to use Pandora on the web browser. That last one is frustrating because I have a cheap (~$50) Sony Blu-Ray player that has a friggin' Pandora app built in, and it works mostly fine other than the fact that the player itself is just dogshit slow because, well, it's $50.

I'd love for there to be custom soundtracks for every PS3 game, but that's not really Sony's fault. The function is built into the SDK, so it's up to developers to include it, but since it isn't mandated as a must-have by Sony, no one's going to bother, unfortunately. Same goes for the screenshot function (I'm not sure if there's a YouTube function/video recording function too in the SDK).

As for Sony, Daydream Sequence is right, unfortunately. Sony's biggest problem is them being Sony. They messed up with the PS3 launch which cost them valuable market share in the US, their marketing has been hit or miss this gen, their first party lineup is great IMO, but it doesn't sell to the NA audience, and the Vita is currently flaundering as it is a product that there just isn't any market left for (Nintendo gobbled up the dedicated handheld market, and iOS and Android are ruling the more casually oriented handheld gaming market). Sony needs to take a long, hard look at how they messed up the PS3 and PSV before they launch the PS4.
 
The problem of warring fiefdoms has never been a Sony exclusive. They don't have an operating system and enterprise software business to fall back on though and their historic bread and butter - televisions - have been commoditized, while other consumer electronics have been Appled.

-----

I have being saying this for years. Outside acouple games like inFamous, Uncharted and GT, Sonys software has no relevancy to the masses and is just championed by nerds on the Internet.

Sony never will get their own version of Halo/Gears/Mario/Zelda etc, they blew it when they lost Spyro and Crash Bandicoot. There is never a go to game for the 'Playstation Family' like the way people flock to the Xbox for Halo or Nintendo devices for Mario/Zelda.
Odd. Infamous has some sort of relevancy to the masses?

Sony's biggest IP, Gran Turismo, although its star has waned somewhat, sells more than several Nintendo IPs and pretty much any Microsoft published property not titled Halo. It's not a character driven property though - ergo it's unlikely to generate any sort of cultural icon.

God of War is their next most established franchise. While they're trying to build the Uncharted franchise to a similar level.

But the masses don't really give a shit about Cole McGrath. Any more than they do about Alan Wake or Pikmin.
 
Uncharted 2 one of the most critically acclaimed games of all time. It's like the orcarina of time /ff7 of this generation and was the overall highlight game imo.

I know it's your opinion but i highly doubt UC2 will EVER be looked back on in the same light that OoT is. What exactly did the game innovate? Becoming more like a movie? Witty dialogue? Automated platforming?
 
I fail to see how Sony make brilliant software imo, Resistance, Killzone, Infamous are all average at best with Infamous being above average. There are way better alternatives to most of the games they have made this gen.

For me the only truly great exclusives they have put out are Valkryia Chronicles which was done by a 3rd party, and Ratchet and Clank A Crack in Time. Demons Souls is probably the best out of the lot.

You kind of ignored their highest rated games there.
 
You're one of the worst offenders as of late, so I don't think you're one to pass judgement.

I will admit that I've been feeding the trolls in a sense but its pretty fucking annoying to see the same group of posters trying to shit up and downplay anything that comes from a certain company.
 
If UC 2 was released today it wouldn't get the same scores as it did back then, I've noticed there is a rising resentment against super linear, scripted games these days whilst there wasn't back then.
 
I know it's your opinion but i highly doubt UC2 will EVER be looked back on in the same light that OoT is. What exactly did the game innovate? Becoming more like a movie? Witty dialogue? Automated platforming?

Comparing UC2 to OoT is not possible. Two completely different games set out to do completely different things. A game need not be looked back fondly solely based on whether it innovated in any area. It will be looked upon with fondness if it is a damn good game. UC2 is one of the greatest games of this gen and will always be looked upon that way.
 
If UC 2 was released today it wouldn't get the same scores as it did back then, I've noticed there is a rising resentment against super linear, scripted games these days whilst there wasn't back then.

Thats only a section of GAF. Neither the press nor the fans judging by the consistent review scores and sales. UC2 would have got the same scores if not more if it were released today. Why? Because it is just a brilliant game with some of the best pacing in any game ever released this gen.
 
I will admit that I've been feeding the trolls in a sense but its pretty fucking annoying to see the same group of posters trying to shit up and downplay anything that comes from a certain company.

Perhaps you should take a break from the Gaming side for a bit. I know that I have to every once in awhile.
 
Or maybe gamers at large just don't think Sony's software is that brilliant?

This is the key for me.

Making a bunch of mediocre to ok games with small chunks of super fans doesn't mean the software is brilliant.

Basically every disc based franchise Sony makes has a much more polished third party game in the same genre.



Some of the PSN stuff I could see being called brilliant and original even if many of the more well liked games on Gaf aren't my cup of tea.
 
Comparing UC2 to OoT is not possible. Two completely different games set out to do completely different things. A game need not be looked back fondly solely based on whether it innovated in any area. It will be looked upon with fondness if it is a damn good game. UC2 is one of the greatest games of this gen and will always be looked upon that way.

I know there's really no possible answer to this debate unless someone has a time machine. I just doubt games like Uncharted that rely heavily on presentation will be as fondly looked upon as time goes on. Graphics get better and better, I'm sure there will be a better looking version of the formula next gen and the gen after. What is left to hold onto after that? It's a great game I just have my doubts.
 
Top Bottom