Bartski
Gold Member
In 2017 lord emperor Jimbo got everyone's knickers in a twist by responding to a question from Time about backwards compatibility:
Turns out he was right - in the long run, nobody seems to give a shit.
After expanding PSN in response to high demand for backwards compatibility for legacy games with the streamable, PS1-PS3 library emulation, not a single bleep about user base size has ever been published and PS Classics keeps looking like a minimum viable product with zero creative catalogue management remotely following the gaming zeitgeist.
Does anybody feel like checking pre-PS4 Armore Core games after playing the latest installment? How about have some Syphon Filter and fuck off. Silent Hill2 remake is on the way, perhaps access to this classic series you literally can't play anymore unless you curate a home console museum? No but here is Parappa the Rapper.
Is Sony too poor to license out games that nobody will ever play anyway if they don't appear on the platform? Or perhaps, just perhaps, they see such minimal interest, that they just keep the servers going by sunk cost fallacy?
So my question to my fellow ponies who have been signed up to the service from day one like yours truly - how much have you actually used the service?
After short inspection, my personal return on the investment this far is around 3 save points deep into ICO. And while I can afford just to stay signed up waiting for better times, not sure if those times ever arrive, and if they do - not sure if I'll even care, there are just too many new games to play.
Thoughts?
When we've dabbled with backwards compatibility, I can say it is one of those features that is much requested, but not actually used much. That, and I was at a Gran Turismo event recently where they had PS1, PS2, PS3 and PS4 games, and the PS1 and the PS2 games, they looked ancient, like why would anybody play this?
Turns out he was right - in the long run, nobody seems to give a shit.
After expanding PSN in response to high demand for backwards compatibility for legacy games with the streamable, PS1-PS3 library emulation, not a single bleep about user base size has ever been published and PS Classics keeps looking like a minimum viable product with zero creative catalogue management remotely following the gaming zeitgeist.
Does anybody feel like checking pre-PS4 Armore Core games after playing the latest installment? How about have some Syphon Filter and fuck off. Silent Hill2 remake is on the way, perhaps access to this classic series you literally can't play anymore unless you curate a home console museum? No but here is Parappa the Rapper.
Is Sony too poor to license out games that nobody will ever play anyway if they don't appear on the platform? Or perhaps, just perhaps, they see such minimal interest, that they just keep the servers going by sunk cost fallacy?
So my question to my fellow ponies who have been signed up to the service from day one like yours truly - how much have you actually used the service?
After short inspection, my personal return on the investment this far is around 3 save points deep into ICO. And while I can afford just to stay signed up waiting for better times, not sure if those times ever arrive, and if they do - not sure if I'll even care, there are just too many new games to play.
Thoughts?
Last edited: