kevo_huevo
Member
snack said:Battier was a great pickup. Gotta agree with Charles.
battier is the ultimate glue guy to bring off the bench.
snack said:Battier was a great pickup. Gotta agree with Charles.
commish said:I can't wait until the Blazer fans whine about the fouls and ignore the huge difference in rebounding.
lawlohwhat said:you're wrong, as per usual, but the blazers are losing for other reasons. no offensive rebounding, missing free throws, shooting poorly from the outside, etc. refs are always awful, gotta play through it.
He's probably the reason advanced stats exist, lol.snack said:Battier was a great pickup. Gotta agree with Charles.
lawlohwhat said:looks like this one is going 7, blazers have to be tougher. how do you let tyson chandler punk you?
dIEHARD said:you seriously don't know that?
Knicks-esque.Black Mamba said:Since and including the game the Lakers destroyed the Spurs in San Antonio after the all-star break, the Spurs are 11-12.
Lakers broke dat swagger.
1. Are the Spurs done?
Mark Haubner, The Painted Area: I actually think the Spurs are OK. They barely lost Game 1 without Manu, and had an uncharacteristically bad shooting night both behind the arc and by Tony Parker on the break in Game 3. San Antonio needs to get better looks on its corner 3s, but it should have enough to get by a formidable Memphis squad.
J.M. Poulard, WarriorsWorld: As dominant as the Grizzlies have looked in this series, their wins have come by a combined six points. One would expect the Spurs to play relatively better and eventually put some pressure on a Memphis team that is in uncharted territory. I expect the Spurs' experience to get them back to their winning ways going forward.
Darius Soriano, Forum Blue & Gold: Count the Spurs out at your own peril. They're down right now, but they're far from out of this series. Win Game 4 and they have the home-court advantage again, Ginobili getting healthier and still the experience of a champion. Their interior defense is an issue, but better shot-making will compensate, at least against Memphis.
Ethan Sherwood Strauss, HoopSpeak: As long as 3s are worth more than 2s, San Antonio should be favored. If this series were played back when illegal defense existed, the Spurs would not keep pace with Zach Randolph's isolation scoring. But the small-market Grizz can't afford time machines. Like a dark blue bear, Memphis has no place in the playoff ecosystem.
Timothy Varner, 48 Minutes of Hell: Not at all. But the Spurs aren't without their worries. Being down 2-1 is one thing. The most problematic aspect of this series for San Antonio is that the Spurs are being outplayed physically and mentally. Their failure to execute in the final seconds of Game 3 was the least Spursian thing we've seen in the Popovich/Duncan era.
Thank you. The lockout season was horrible and I thought we all agreed to forget about it. There were back-to-back-to-backs that year. Back-to-backs in the playoffs. Everybody was out of shape and scoring fell off a ton.AlphaSnake said:And as far as the Knicks thing, yes I know they beat Miami. But seriously, that was a lockout season with barely any games...that doesn't even count.
Black Mamba said:Since and including the game the Lakers destroyed the Spurs in San Antonio after the all-star break, the Spurs are 11-12.
Lakers broke dat swagger.
That and not cheating on his SAT.Gigglepoo said:Kidd eschewing a wide-open three to dish it to Peja for an equally open attempt is what separates him from Rose.
Since playing the Jazz and getting White Mamba'd , the Lakers are 4-6.Black Mamba said:Since and including the game the Lakers destroyed the Spurs in San Antonio after the all-star break, the Spurs are 11-12.
Lakers broke dat swagger.
They was back to back games in the playoffs before the lockout season.Rodeo Clown said:Thank you. The lockout season was horrible and I thought we all agreed to forget about it. There were back-to-back-to-backs that year. Back-to-backs in the playoffs. Everybody was out of shape and scoring fell off a ton.
And that's what we get to look forward to next January.
jobber said:Beating Miami by 30 was our peek
just like the Lakers beat the Heat.........errrrr wait
kevo_huevo said:even if the mavs hang on, i don't see this as a backbreaking loss. i see the blazers responding and blowing out the mavs game 6.
reilo said:thekad also prophesied Portland's biggest problem this year during the second season: they're bad.
dIEHARD said:Since playing the Jazz and getting White Mamba'd , the Lakers are 4-6.
Hayward broke dat swagger.
Aldridge played great in the games when Portland was hitting their outside shots. When the shooters don't hit anything, like tonight, the opposing team can just pack the paint and double Aldridge and make his life miserable. That's exactly what happened tonight.Raging Spaniard said:The Blazers were playing great right before the playoffs, but they have totally changed their style. I know its the playoffs but tightening the rotation and starting to depend on Roy again has hurt them. Cant get far if you only play 7 guys because if theyre not playing well youre shit out of options.
Yes, Roy played amazing in the comeback game, it was his win ... but this team was really clicking with Aldridge as the main guy and it feels like we havent seen him since the playoffs started.
Here's a quarter. Try again.thekad said:
Rodeo Clown said:Thank you. The lockout season was horrible and I thought we all agreed to forget about it. There were back-to-back-to-backs that year. Back-to-backs in the playoffs. Everybody was out of shape and scoring fell off a ton.
And that's what we get to look forward to next January.
That's not so much a prophecy as a basic observation.reilo said:Nate McMillan also prophesied Portland's biggest problem this year during the off-season: they lack shooters.
BatiGOOOOOOL said:
Bishman said:Dallas in 6!
AlphaSnake said:The Mavs were last. But I'm too lazy to check...weren't they tied with someone else? Or was that 06?
And as far as the Knicks thing, yes I know they beat Miami. But seriously, that was a lockout season with barely any games...that doesn't even count. I should've been more specific. Besides, were the Heat even #1 overall or just East?
I understand you've been watching the NBA for about 18 months, but seriously?Bishman said:Brandon Roy is a fluke.
22 mins / 5 points / -13
AlphaSnake said:On top of that, the assclowns busting out the jokes should laugh at themselves. The Heat were nowhere near the "#1 overall" I had asked for. It was the Spurs, tying a W-L record with the Jazz.
And once again, the lockout season shouldn't even count.
AlphaSnake said:How about dem Spurs?
When was the last time the #1 overall team got eliminated in the 1st round?
BobLoblaw said: