Herpes Reasons
Banned
Hopefully that henry dunk was the highlight of the year
To be fair Westbrook has Durant to outshine him.WESTBROOK?!?!?!
WESTBROOK?!!?!?!?!?!
WESTBROOK?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Yeah. But the whole broadcast isn't doing too much for the most part. They mainly stick to just showing the game.
ESPN try to add a whole lot of production, but usually, it's just rubbish and poorly done. And some of it over laps actual game time.
I mean, outside JVG, who regularly calls out the stupid, i can't think of another ESPN commentator that i'd miss.
ESPN/ABC has got better since 03. No more musical acts at halftime of games. Toned down the stupid ass musical openings. Still..outside the same 5-6 teams, it's like the other 25 teams don't exist on ABC. If ESPN is forced to broadcast a low tier team, that game magically ends up on ESPN2.
Still rather Fox or NBC get the rights so we'll see games not featuring Kobe or LeBron.
BTW on a related note....Turner and CBS are in talks to trade Marv Albert for Jim Nantz
http://www.sbnation.com/2013/4/8/4194826/turner-marv-albert-final-four-in-2014
Even in the preseason the Lakers come out and start the game with a big run on us. Why does this happen every time we play? It's crazy.
The games with the Lakers this year are our Finals. It's sad, but that's really all I'm amped up about this season aside from watching the young players develop. We're going to be a mess though.
huh? Utah was the team that started with a big run. Lakers were down double digits in the 1st quarter.
And come on, now. Beating the Lakers this year won't be hard with the stealth-tank on.
BTW, hope your son is doing okay. Best wishes to him.
He's already done the midnight madness thing, I think.When does Wiggins play his first game?
All 30 GMs responded to 56 different questions about the best teams, players, coaches, fans, and offseason moves. General managers were not permitted to vote for their own team or personnel. Percentages are based on the pool of respondents to each question of the survey, rather than all 30 GMs.
Here's the voting breakdown:
Who is the best shooting guard in the NBA?
1. James Harden, Houston -- 56.7%
2. Kobe Bryant, L.A. Lakers -- 20.0%
3. Stephen Curry, Golden State; Kevin Durant, Oklahoma City; Paul George, Indiana -- 6.7%
6. Dwyane Wade, Miami -- 3.3%
Last year: Kobe Bryant -- 66.7%
He still doesn't look like complete ass, which is more than I'm used to from that position. I expected him to spend the entire season in Tulsa but he might actually contribute.It's preseason, Gondo.
You're going to regret losing Larden for a long time.
Jalen Rostradamus predicted Harden and Dwight to Houston, too.
Sorry bro.Gondo if the preseason meant anything it would mean the Jazz only have about 3.5 good players and are going to be terrible this season.
Oh.. shit.
Sorry bro.
...
Yeah, I think we have to make some kind of move this season. We have to win a chip in the next three seasons to have a chance of keeping KD. It's not desperation time, but it's getting close.
Pretty fucking salty... But we're better for sure now (assuming Westbrook comes back healthy, obviously), and even if they trade Asik for a piece we have time to make moves as well.How fucking salty would KD be if you guys lost to the Rox in the WCF?
I wouldn't be surprised if we move Ibaka. We also have some first-rounders still, including one that could be pretty valuable from Dallas.What moves do they have to make? Teams don't want OKC's trash with this draft class coming in.
Pretty fucking salty... But we're better for sure now (assuming Westbrook comes back healthy, obviously), and even if they trade Asik for a piece we have time to make moves as well.
Not worrying yet, but this season is absolutely pivotal. Like I said, I'd rather have traded Westbrook and rolled with someone like Jackson at PG. Harden does so many things well and is a perfect compliment to KD at the SG position.
Nothing we can do about it now. I just wish we had traded Harden to someone in the East. I know you're loving Bradley Beal, but wouldn't you rather have Harden?
I wouldn't be surprised if we move Ibaka. We also have some first-rounders still, including one that could be pretty valuable from Dallas.
I think Houston's effectiveness on offense will be limited by having Dwight and Asik on the floor at the same time. They take up a lot of real estate in the paint and would greatly slow the pace of play. I'm also still waiting on Dwight to start demanding post-up opportunities. It will be hilarious.Eh, I'm not so sure about the bolded. You guys have absolutely no answer for Dwight and Asik on the court together if they manage to figure that out.
If it were just a matter of Harden for Beal I'd take that, but the deal would have dropped us in the draft and we'd have ended up with Shabazz or Adams, and I think Porter has a chance to be every bit as good as Beal, so in hindsight I'm glad we didn't make the move.
The Dallas pick is protected from 1-20 until 2018, when it becomes unprotected.First rounders for this year? Yeah you might be able to get something for them. Although Dallas's will be late lottery at best.
Trading Ibaka though? You really think Presti would do that it would be a PR disaster for him. Especially if he traded him for nothing and a one year rental again which would make KD even more pissy.
How am I in denial? I'm legitimately concerned that KD or YNB (or both) will leave, and I openly stated I'd rather have traded Westbrook than Harden.MorisUkunRasik said:Gondo is still in denial.
Wasn't the reason OkC dumped Harden cash related?
He wouldn't budge from a max deal, which would have put us way over the tax starting this year. We offered him 4 years and between $50 and $55 million if you believe the reports.Wasn't the reason OkC dumped Harden cash related?
Plus oneOKC FO bet on the wrong horse (Ibaka) and now will probably only make cash saving moves.
A team doesn't fuck up their chemistry, piss off their stars by trading a rising star who likes to live in the middle of the middle of nowhere for 1 year of KMart, Lamb and a meh pick.
Gondo is still in denial.
He wouldn't budge from a max deal, which would have put us way over the tax starting this year. We offered him 4 years and between $50 and $55 million if you believe the reports.
We essentially chose keeping a core of YNB, Durant, and Ibaka and more financial flexibility into the future over Harden (in addition to the young guys we got via the trade--Adams and Lamb). We also (obviously) underestimated his trade value and how good he would be as a #1 option.
At the same time, we know that several other (better) deals were rejected. We tried to send him to GS for Klay, to Toronto for Valanciunas, and to Washington for Bradley Beal.
His Finals performance had nothing to do with why we traded him before the season started.Because Presti panicked and made the trade when Harden just came off an awful performance in the finals.
We're talking hypotheticals now. Nobody knew how good Harden would be in a #1 role (not even Houston), and it's idiotic to think Presti didn't take the best deal he was offered for him at the time. We'd be able to get far more for him now, but that's not how things work.MorisUkunRasik said:So the FO who chose flexibility instead of a player who was already top 5 at his position and with the few in front of him being much older....is gonna spend now or in the near future? The time to spend to win has pasted. Maybe that's a bit helps ndsightbis 20/20 but most everyone knew Harden was going to best the best 2 guard or damn near.
What possible option would be better than a very young SG who compliments your franchise player perfectly? There was no reason to choose flexibility. When that FO says 'flexibility' to fans they mean 'to save money'
The FO is obviously not dumb. They just took a huge risk by betting that their odds are better of competing long-term with Ibaka and other young players alongside YNB and KD than with Harden and a pu pu platter of bigs and late first-round type of players.I disagree that the Harden situation was at all complex. There are lots of details involved but they all still point to the FO being dumb or cheap.
I agree. I'm sure you'd also agree that you need good frontcourt players to win a title, especially in the Western Conference.OKC would be supremely lucky to get a player almost as good as Harden, I'm sure you'd agree. I'm not sure how that doesn't make them look cheap and/or dumb when they HAD Harden.
How many "defensive bigs with decent offense" can you count in this league? Sounds a lot like Ibaka to me.The choice wasn't Harden YN KD Perk or Ibaka YN KD Perk and flexibility.
They could have flipped YN and/or Ibaka sooner or later for a defensive big who had decent offense.
Like I said, yea there are lots of details to the Harden situation but they all still point to a cheap or dumb FO.
How many "defensive bigs with decent offense" can you count in this league? Sounds a lot like Ibaka to me.
It's getting pretty damn convoluted now
Steven Adams looking like our best center already. 10 points and 8 rebounds in 26 minutes last night. Averaging 7.4 points, 8.6 rebounds and over 1 block thru 5 preseason games (24 minutes per game).
Very promising for such a young guy. He's apparently come a long way just since getting drafted and working with our coaches.
Wasn't the reason OkC dumped Harden cash related?
Yep
Clay Bennett and his cheap, traitorous ass