Small town perspective for ya'll. Classic arguments are made, and some disturbing insights into the way people have interwoven faith with politics.
Small town perspective for ya'll. Classic arguments are made, and some disturbing insights into the way people have interwoven faith with politics.
"Please help us with your taxes, but heaven forbid they go to anyone else."Across the bar, Amber Rowland, who helps run the place, insisted that she agrees with the ban on refugees and suspension of immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries.
"You want to help people out to get away from their countries and things like that," Rowland noted. "But it's making it harder for us to have a life. These people who are coming in are getting free handouts and everything else like that."
"We have people here who need help," she said.
Good post, and you make good points, but damn if it's not depressing seeing Trump get support for something that is so clearly Anti-American. Whether that support is based on ignorance, disinterest, or complicity it's still awful that 49% indicate that they're OK with one of the worst civil rights abuses in decades.
To put it another way, if the question said "Do you agree with Trump's EO that barred green card holders from these countries" the results would show even less support.
Your optimism is just precious.
Your optimism is just precious.
1201 people in this poll?
Half republicans half democrats?
have you never seen a poll before?wait there were only 1201 peeps that polled? how does that even = "americans"
have you never seen a poll before?
Do you understand how statistics work?Thus why is this even a thread
Because only something like 26% completely agree with the order. A lot of people like the idea of increased vetting (because they think we dont already do that even though there is zero evidence the vetting isn't working) but that doesn't mean they want interpreters who helped the US army or green card holders who happened to be out of the country fucked over.I see people pissed everywhere and his approval rating is nose diving fast.
Something does not compute.
Your in an echo chamber. Where I work I have a few that support him and others who could care either way.I see people pissed everywhere and his approval rating is nose diving fast.
Something does not compute.
I see people pissed everywhere and his approval rating is nose diving fast.
Something does not compute.
I bet you that these numbers would have been higher Friday night. Even Republican leaning tracking polls like Rasmussen show his support lower now than when he took office, and sharply dropping since friday.What state are you in? Based on the consensus of everyone around me it was unfathomable that Trump could get elected but here we are.
So I guess 49% of Americans are assholes/ cowards.
What they didn't say is that the people in line with this viewpoint were all collected from exactly where you'd expect people to be in line with this viewpoint to come from.
The 41 % were from the opposite place and the 10% who don't know are still at home trying to make their VHS player stop blinking 12:00.
Wow, VHS reference. You've dated yourself, Gen X'er.
half of people are dickbags. not really a shock.
Here's another poll, Quinnipiac:
http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/01/...erica-voters-support-trumps-immigration-order
It's 48% to 42%.
I think it's seriously time to consider spliting up. Let the dumb fucks fend for themselves with their shit economy and enjoy their ignorance, bigotry and hillbilly Trump-led Theocracy. They'll see how good they'll have it when they're not being wholly subsidized by all those blue states they hate so much.
We can even build a wall so all the old white people can live together in harmony and they can leave everyone else alone to actually live an enjoyable and progressive life.
This poll was taken January 5-9 (before Trump was even inaugurated) and the actual question asked was "Do you support or oppose suspending immigration from "terror prone" regions, even if it means turning away refugees from those regions". I'm not surprised to see high poll numbers or surprised to see Fox News spin it as if it's a reaction to the executive order. (Fox News reporting: A "new poll" released "last week" spun as support for a 2-day-old policy is actually an old poll, released 17 days ago, using data collection starting 24 days ago. Transparent as fuck.)Here's another poll, Quinnipiac:
http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/01/...erica-voters-support-trumps-immigration-order
It's 48% to 42%.
I once thought give it 20 years and all the dumb fucks will be dead but people in my life who I never would have expected voted for the asshole...
I think it's seriously time to consider spliting up. Let the dumb fucks fend for themselves with their shit economy and enjoy their ignorance, bigotry and hillbilly Trump-led Theocracy. They'll see how good they'll have it when they're not being wholly subsidized by all those blue states they hate so much.
We can even build a wall so all the old white people can live together in harmony and they can leave everyone else alone to actually live an enjoyable and progressive life.
Don't leave me behind. My wife won't move back to San Francisco.You know, there really is no fixing this country. Calexit pls.
Correct. Sample size does not matter. The sample is the important part.Do you understand how statistics work?
1200 respondents is more than enough to give a representative sample as long as the respondents are properly randomly selected (that's the hard part).
wait there were only 1201 peeps that polled? how does that even = "americans"
Sorry about that, you're right.This poll was taken January 5-9 (before Trump was even inaugurated) and the actual question asked was "Do you support or oppose suspending immigration from "terror prone" regions, even if it means turning away refugees from those regions".
Interesting enough the numbers were very similar despite what happened.I think if the order actually did just temporarily suspend new immigration from the countries in question the backlash wouldn't have been nearly as strong. Instead, we have the rollout clusterfuck and people with green cards, already-issued visas, etc. getting entangled in it too.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-immigration-poll-exclusive-idUSKBN15F2MG said:The Reuters/Ipsos poll was conducted online in English in all 50 states. It gathered poll responses from 1,201 people including 453 Democrats and 478 Republicans. It has a credibility interval, a measure of accuracy, of 3 percentage points for the entire sample and 5 percentage points for the Democrats and the Republicans.
Is this really enough proof for "49 % of Americans agree with Trump's travel ban"? I find it a bit iffy, personally.
To put things in historical contest, past refugee polls:
More from Pew here: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/30/key-facts-about-refugees-to-the-u-s/
Yeah. I have to wonder what we'd see with more specific questions, like "Do you approve of immediately suspending all currently-issued visas from these countries, barring persons who have already passed vetting from entering or returning to the united states for 90 days".Interesting enough the numbers were very similar despite what happened.
And that isn't a justification either. If anything you'll just make the case for Trump stronger with his supporters.
1200 people is a crazy small sample. I don't believe it's actually this close.