The Big Rig
Member
They are awesome, and they look absolutely ridiculous.Gila said:Oh man, I bet their awesome
but they look hilarious
They are awesome, and they look absolutely ridiculous.Gila said:Oh man, I bet their awesome
but they look hilarious
adg1034 said:No amps, DACs, or other similar electronic accessories in any of my setups at this point, though that could absolutely change. Still, thoughts from anybody on these? I feel like the next tier of headphones starts dealing with rapidly diminishing returns (especially for the money that'd be involved), though I'd love to be proven wrong.
Oh, that looks nice and is really inexpensive plus easy to drive. Perfect for what charlequin wants.Geneijin said:The Samson SR850 can be bought from Amazon.com and it's within your budget.
Edit: Semi-open design, as comfortable as the AKG K271 MKII, easy to drive (32 ohms) than the AKG K240 or K271 from a portable source and computer, and one of the better budget phones you can get for both gaming and music. Try matching the Samson SR850 with a software like Dolby Headphones i.e. ASUS soundcard or a mixamp for gaming. I think you'd be surprised how well it does compared to other cheap gaming headsets around the same range.
How was the DAC fed?ElyrionX said:This is the scary part of the hobby, IMO. I have a Peachtree Nova (according to reviews, it's a really good DAC + headphone amp) and a Beyerdynamic T1. On the whole, it's pretty high end equipment. And I did a blind test recently with 256 kbps AAC and lossless WAV files. I couldn't really tell the difference. When listening to them knowing which files were which, I thought I could tell. But the differences are really subtle and the blind test was really difficult.
Look into the hifiman ef2aderder said:Just bought the Sennheiser HD650s and am looking for an appropriate USB DAC/Headphone Amp for use at work.
I would like to spend $250 or less and would prefer it to be small as it has to fit on my office desk (and I don't want to look like a pretentious dbag).
I have the nuForce headphone amp/dac that was recommended by the OP but now am looking for more of an upgrade.
Not really, most here only dabble in stereo.Ken Masters said:I want to get my brother 7.1 surround sound wireless headphones (for PS3 blu-ray/movie usage mainly). Any recommendation for around $200 price range?
Converting from an mp3 won't make it any better. You need the raw audio file to properly convert.Gila said:What codecs do you guys listen to mostly, whether at home or portable? I'm researching more about FLAC and ALAC and if it's better to convert my mp3s into them. But do you guys recommend it and is it quite noticeable with a nice pair of headphones?
The Big Rig said:Converting from an mp3 won't make it any better. You need the raw audio file to properly convert.
No, those are okay, but not worth the price...These are thoughAnonymous Tipster said:Someone suggested these ear buds in another thread and they had pretty solid reviews. Does anyone have any thoughts about them?
Bose IE2 Audio Headphones
I'm looking for some nice ear buds at a price tag lower than $100.
I thought he said they had to be super lightweight for some reason, if not then how about these:FoxSpirit said:Oh, that looks nice and is really inexpensive plus easy to drive. Perfect for what charlequin wants.
People who suggest PortaPro or MEelectronic HT-21, what? 30 hours a week with on-ears which both have a small and thin, unpadded headband to boot? Seriously guys :-\
How was the DAC fed?
Gila said:I see, thanks
Yeah most of my music is generally 320kbps
Ken Masters said:I want to get my brother 7.1 surround sound wireless headphones (for PS3 blu-ray/movie usage mainly). Any recommendation for around $200 price range?
Witchfinder General said:My valves finally arrived for my preamp!
2 x Sophia Princess Carbon 300B valves
2 x Sophia Princess Grade "A" 6SL7 valves
Not cheap but worth every cent.
I know what impedance is; I figure'd it wouldn't be a problem at 50ohms, most of the reviews I read claimed the Sennies would be perfectly fine unamped.HiResDes said:Impedance...Read about it, most IEMS are going to be more efficient than full-size cans
Lucario said:I know what impedance is; I figure'd it wouldn't be a problem at 50ohms, most of the reviews I read claimed the Sennies would be perfectly fine unamped.
At the time, I was more curious if emailing audio and broadband would destroy bits of information. We decided that the uncompressed 96 zip was the least damaging (though almost not existent, there is a slight degradation, not as much as FLAC).
TheExodu5 said:My brain hurts. I've been reading some threads because I'm researching the best setup for my dad's up and coming computer audiophile system, and I came upon some posts by a "professional sound engineer" from BlueCoast Audio. In support of his claim that WAV is superior to FLAC, he claims e-mailing digital files degrades them slightly. Golden ears, I swear. My brain hurts so much.
Some audiophiles...I swear.
LordCanti said:He should just cut the bullshit and start CRC checking his files already. Only way to be sure.
/sarcasm
TheExodu5 said:My brain hurts. I've been reading some threads because I'm researching the best setup for my dad's up and coming computer audiophile system, and I came upon some posts by a "professional sound engineer" from BlueCoast Audio. In support of his claim that WAV is superior to FLAC, he claims e-mailing digital files degrades them slightly. Golden ears, I swear. My brain hurts so much.
Some audiophiles...I swear.
TheExodu5 said:My brain hurts. I've been reading some threads because I'm researching the best setup for my dad's up and coming computer audiophile system, and I came upon some posts by a "professional sound engineer" from BlueCoast Audio. In support of his claim that WAV is superior to FLAC, he claims e-mailing digital files degrades them slightly. Golden ears, I swear. My brain hurts so much.
Some audiophiles...I swear.
FoxSpirit said:How was the DAC fed?
Hahaha, some people.TheExodu5 said:My brain hurts. I've been reading some threads because I'm researching the best setup for my dad's up and coming computer audiophile system, and I came upon some posts by a "professional sound engineer" from BlueCoast Audio. In support of his claim that WAV is superior to FLAC, he claims e-mailing digital files degrades them slightly. Golden ears, I swear. My brain hurts so much.
Some audiophiles...I swear.
No, I mean which program, did you use ASIO/WASAPI?ElyrionX said:Via a cheap USB cable that came packed in with the Peachtree Nova.
I have now ordered a FiiO E7 for my laptop. You win headphone GAF! Now I just have to make the headphone choice...Stubo said:At which level of headphones should I start to worry about getting a separate DAC?
From reading the thread and looking around online it would seem that the Sennheiser PC360, for example, would be amped enough on my laptop's soundcard, or when plugged in to my phone.
The issue is that I am unsure if there would be a large drop-off in sound quality while using these sources, or if at this 'lower-end' (in the grand spectrum of 'audiophile' headphones) the differences would be small enough to not worry about.
If not, what is the most worth spending on headphones when considering no (external) DAC will be used, so I can compare the total outlay of both paths. (I appreciate much of both questions will be personal preference, but I figured I'd ask to see if there was a general consensus.)
Thanks in advance!
FoxSpirit said:No, I mean which program, did you use ASIO/WASAPI?
If you are only using it with your laptop, the E10 is far superior to the E7.Stubo said:RE: This post:
I have now ordered a FiiO E7 for my laptop.
Laptop most of the time, but probably also my phone (which I use in place of an mp3 player).K.Jack said:If you are only using it with your laptop, the E10 is far superior to the E7.
Basically iTunes uses Dsound as interface, which softens the whole output quite a bit. Maybe try setting up your playback with foobar, there's a WASAPI plugin for that. The windows sound slider shouldn't have any effect anymore when set up correctly.ElyrionX said:iTunes
Basically iTunes uses Dsound as interface, which softens the whole output quite a bit. Maybe try setting up your playback with foobar, there's a WASAPI plugin for that. The windows sound slider shouldn't have any effect anymore when set up correctly.
What it does is bypassing the internal Windows mixer which is of pretty mediocre fidelity.
Alternatively, I use XBMC when I set my PC up as streamer, works well with WASAPI too. The alternative is selecting ASIO when installed for you card and supported by the programm but that's even more rare than WASAPI.
Basically iTunes uses Dsound as interface, which softens the whole output quite a bit. Maybe try setting up your playback with foobar, there's a WASAPI plugin for that. The windows sound slider shouldn't have any effect anymore when set up correctly.
What it does is bypassing the internal Windows mixer which is of pretty mediocre fidelity.
Alternatively, I use XBMC when I set my PC up as streamer, works well with WASAPI too. The alternative is selecting ASIO when installed for you card and supported by the programm but that's even more rare than WASAPI.