Zaptruder said:
Question: Why spend so much on the right set of headphones when most if not all the desired affect can be achieved via an equalizer tuned to your tastes?
My mp3 player (phone really) has a software equalizer - why is that significantly worse than a hardware based solution?
If youve never heard headphones of very good or exceptional quality, then you wont get it till you hear it.
EQ can be used to slightly tweak a sound signature. you can slightly boost frequency responses to your taste. But you cant push it too far or else you WILL hear distortion as you increase the EQ. You cant use it to hide major deficiencies in equipment. its lipstick on a pig
a poor quality headphone that has excessive bass might be able to provide that THUD of bass but wont be able to provide details of the music
behind the THUD. the actual sound of bass strings vibrating and the note the music is playing at.
similarly, songs with complex and fast guitar playing will sound less detailed and you wont be able to hear all the details of the guitar strings or the finger sliding and picking the strings on cheap headphones. youll hear just the obvious notes but not the whole picture. EQing cant fix that. you need better equipment to actually reproduce these sounds.
Now, its fair to say that theres an obvious curve of diminishing returns as you go higher up the ladder in equipment. a lot of these subtle details can be heard on headphones that cost around 100 bucks.
But as you get better stuff, the ability for a headphone to be able to reproduce
both amazing high frequency detail plus low frequency detail improves. cheaper headphones usually focus on one or the other. you can also get improvement to soundstage so its easier to identify where performer are located in space around your head (best on live recordings) as you go up the ladder.