TrebleShot
Member
They can the streaming rights in the uk won’t stop it they’d just sell them to anyone if the other biddersThey can't buy Ubisoft.
They can the streaming rights in the uk won’t stop it they’d just sell them to anyone if the other biddersThey can't buy Ubisoft.
Possibly, but it's probably too much of a headache having to renegotiate the deal with the CMA.They can the streaming rights in the uk won’t stop it they’d just sell them to anyone if the other bidders
That's only for this financial year though.Sony as a whole has $14b to spend. Its not likely they will make a purchase higher than $3b
I don’t think that’s how cash on hand works. That’s how much the have in the bank. It’s not profit from the year. For instance, Microsoft had $111b before the Activision purchase as of June ‘23.That's only for this financial year though.
There was never a law that Sony could only spend 18 billion dollars or whatever. This was a number they decided on and could always change.Sony as a whole has $14b to spend. Its not likely they will make a purchase higher than $3b
Companies borrow money, they can sell stock. Acquisitions don't need to be made with cash.I don’t think that’s how cash on hand works.
Agreed, but cash on hand is not the only way you can buy stuff.I don’t think that’s how cash on hand works.
I wouldn’t speak so soon. Fact of the matter is If T2 go up for sale MS would pay comfortably more than Sony for them.
Borrowing money for a purchase such as a studio/publisher is a dumb move and would incur interest over time or make them have to pay a debt. Sony won’t be making any huge investments in the near future. Only smaller ones. Which is a smart move for them.There was never a law that Sony could only spend 18 billion dollars or whatever. This was a number they decided on and could always change.
Companies borrow money, they can sell stock. Acquisitions don't need to be made with cash.
Taking on some debt or selling stock to finance investments is a normal part of doing business for every other company other than Microsoft.Borrowing money for a purchase such as a studio/publisher is a dumb move and would incur interest over time or make them have to pay a debt. Sony won’t be making any huge investments in the near future. Only smaller ones. Which is a smart move for them.
That's literally how M&A's happen though.Borrowing money for a purchase such as a studio is a dumb move and would incur interest over time. Sony won’t be making any huge investments in the near future. Only smaller ones.
Square loses so much money, nobody is going to take that company on.Square is garbage. Maybe for 1bn or less.
Capcom, CDPR and EA only relevant stuff that worth the money.
Yeah but not super long ago, Sony wasn’t doing so hot credit-wise. Either way. Why put Sony in debt when they could comfortably purchase a well thought out acquisition? Sony is successful in the gaming market already, they don’t NEED to acquire anyone. But if they did, there’s no reason to go in debt .That's literally how M&A's happen though.
You run the numbers and if the investment gives you a positive return (including interest payments), and it meets the company's requirements for how big of an ROI is required, it's a good purchase.
Right now, interest rates are quite high, so they'd want to borrow as little as possible, so selling stocks or assets (like how they are actively looking to spin off their financial arm) would be key.
Sony is a very very asset heavy company for their size. They have around 1/2 the total assets that Microsoft does, despite being worth over 20x less on the stock market.
They don't need to acquire anyone today, it's about future proofing.Yeah but not super long ago, Sony wasn’t doing so hot credit-wise. Either way. Why put Sony in debt when they could comfortably purchase a well thought out acquisition? Sony is successful in the gaming market already, they don’t NEED to acquire anyone. But if they did, there’s no reason to go in debt .
None of their actions shows that they care. PlayStation doesn't see Xbox as a serious competitor anymore because of the huge gulf between the two, which keeps growing.You're crazy if you think Sony(Playstation) doesn't care about Microsoft(Xbox).
I think square is a horrible purchase.None of their actions shows that they care. PlayStation doesn't see Xbox as a serious competitor anymore because of the huge gulf between the two, which keeps growing.
Yeah, I don't think Sony will prioritize SquareEnix either. I think their next big acquisition will be a Korean hybrid publisher that gives them content across console games, F2P GaaS, mobile, and PC.I think square is a horrible purchase.
Yes they have final fantasy, but not a lot else that generates mega sales.
As a PC gamer, it's wonderful that that will have no effect on me <smugface>
The thing most ignore is that it is not Sony that's trying to compete. Sony is comfortably sitting on the #1 spot with 0 risks and continuing to grow. Spider-Man 2, their next release, will be one of the biggest launches of the 9th generation.Consolidation yaaaaay.
Sony don't have a casual 70bil to drop however so I think these people's dreams of Sony trying to compete won't happen to the extremes people think.
MS doesn’t care, has enough money. I don’t think they are desperate at all, they like to be in gaming and want to grow , so that that future is secure.The thing most ignore is that it is not Sony that's trying to compete. Sony is comfortably sitting on the #1 spot with 0 risks and continuing to grow. Spider-Man 2, their next release, will be one of the biggest launches of the 9th generation.
It is Microsoft that's trying to compete and, therefore, buying companies in a desperate attempt to do so.
Capcom can probably go toe to toe with cod. Monster Hunter alone is a system seller that pulls in the hardcore and casuals. Add Resident Evil, Devil May Cry and Street Fighter and you got yourself the best console for japanese diehards.None of those would move any sort of needle. Call of Duty alone is more valuable than all those publishers combined.
They need Take 2 to actually reply. GTA is the only thing that would offset COD.
Nah the only game that can consistently go toe to toe with COD is GTA.Capcom can probably go toe to toe with cod. Monster Hunter alone is a system seller that pulls in the hardcore and casuals. Add Resident Evil, Devil May Cry and Street Fighter and you got yourself the best console for japanese diehards.
Any attempt by MS to buy T2 would be immediately blocked by the regulatory bodies. Making 2 large purchases like this in a short period of time would draw unwanted negative attention. As it stands right now, if the government were doing its job properly, MS should be under antitrust suits for Office and Windows.True. That’s how MS got ABK after all.
In the case of most devs sure, I don’t think MS will care enough. But we are talking about T2…. GTA. MS would not let that one slip through their moneyed up fingers.
You keep on blatantly forgetting that the landscape has changed. How are they gonna push this deal through? There will be massive opposition to this. They won't be allowed to own COD and GTA.True. That’s how MS got ABK after all.
In the case of most devs sure, I don’t think MS will care enough. But we are talking about T2…. GTA. MS would not let that one slip through their moneyed up fingers.
How naive u need to be to believe in regulators after AbK deal? They will just need to pay the "right price" to buy it. Ea ans t2 are on ms pocket. Just a matter of times.Any attempt by MS to buy T2 would be immediately blocked by the regulatory bodies. Making 2 large purchases like this in a short period of time would draw unwanted negative attention. As it stands right now, if the government were doing its job properly, MS should be under antitrust suits for Office and Windows.
Maybe because that acquisition was not about "having a tooth" in fantasy land of console wars.They need something.
Buying Bungie ended up being the most toothless acquisition of all time.
Eh we don’t know that yet. Let’s wait till Marathon and their other IP releases first.They need something.
Buying Bungie ended up being the most toothless acquisition of all time.
Fortnite is up their I think, possibly even bigger.Nah the only game that can consistently go toe to toe with COD is GTA.
Sorry, no , this won’t happen. Not a single purchased Microsoft has made was done this way. Sony won’t do it either. Just like at Sony’s purchase history. They bought Bungie for $3.6b which was their biggest expense in some time.They don't need to acquire anyone today, it's about future proofing.
You're better off making these moves from a position of strength rather than a position of desperation.
If they look back in 10 years time when microsoft potentially owns: Call of Duty, Minecraft, all blizzard IP, GTA, Red Dead, the 2K games, Elder scrolls, fallout + more, it will be too late.
And you're right, they could sell off more assets/ stocks to buy someone debt free. But usually it's a combo.
Say for a $30bn purchase- 1/3 cash, 1/3 stock and 1/3 debt ($10bn in debt isn't a lot for a company of Sony's size).
Same, IT Analyst here, . But I don't do predictions.<_<
>_>
I'm an analyst IRL
Source?Sony were given the same opportunity when ABK pitched the deal to them and they denied it.
Do you really need one? Lol. You can't be serious.Source?
If I really need source for information that Sony was in the "mix" to buy ABK?Do you really need one? Lol. You can't be serious.
I did some research and it doesn't look like Sony was ever offered the deal. Not to sound sarcastic but, they couldnt afford it. My apologies. I assumed since Sony and Activision were so such bed fellows, Sony would have been offered the deal by default. Guess that wasn't true. Again, my bad.If I really need source for information that Sony was in the "mix" to buy ABK?
Yeah. I want it...
I mean. Sony of course could "outbid" Microsoft same way that EA outbid Take-Two for Codemasters (Take-Two even announced purchase of Codies, but then EA offered more). But it was not a realistic scenario. There were maybe 2 companies that could outbid Microsoft for ABK - Apple and Google.I did some research and it doesn't look like Sony was ever offered the deal. Not to sound sarcastic but, they couldnt afford it. My apologies. I assumed since Sony and Activision were so such bed fellows, Sony would have been offered the deal by default. Guess that wasn't true. Again, my bad.
Meta tried to outbid Microsoft for ABK, but were out of their league.I mean. Sony of course could "outbid" Microsoft same way that EA outbid Take-Two for Codemasters (Take-Two even announced purchase of Codies, but then EA offered more). But it was not a realistic scenario. There were maybe 2 companies that could outbid Microsoft for ABK - Apple and Google.
From what I understand, when this "sexual harassment" stuff happened and shares of ABK plummeted to 58$, Spencer started talking to Bobby and when he was willing to sell, he talk to Nadella to get it through Microsoft board.