PauloRoberto
Member
Strangely, that shows how the brand is known.Or not. I heard people saying "Nintendo PlayStation" but never heard "PlayStation Nintendo".
Strangely, that shows how the brand is known.Or not. I heard people saying "Nintendo PlayStation" but never heard "PlayStation Nintendo".
Maybe, but still...Only retards use the former
Yeah. The Nintendo brand too.Strangely, that shows how the brand is known.
XBOX sticker on a ROG ALLY and suddenly PlayStation PC porting.This sounds like it's in response to this new ROG ALLY and everyone that keeps shouting "Xbox is getting Playstation games!!"
Sony is about to shut that shit down.
About live service games, they keep committed to build a portfolio of IPs in this segment. About put their single player games in others platforms, I agree with you. Ryan and Hulst made comments in the past that suggest they would be more aggressive about porting games for PC or even other consoles, but they seems to make a step back.The wording gets less committal each year. They are also walking back from gaas. Perhaps there is some course correction going on internally.
Something that has only happened in the last year or so is the complete implosion of the Xbox console platform while the switch and its successor continue to smash records. There is also the general failure of subscription services across the board. I'm sure Sony has noticed this and is probably informing them of what kind of business strategy they should follow.
As a known company name, yeah, that's why I'm telling so many times about brand. Now for the US$1 mi question: if someone wants a 'Nintendo Playstation' and discovers that this thing does not exist (it existed, we know, but that's another story), will it by a Nintendo 'something' or a Sony Playstation? Given the fact Playstation has never been so healthy, we know this answer - for the good or bad.Yeah. The Nintendo brand too.
A Nintendo something.will it by a Nintendo 'something' or a Sony Playstation?
All I ask for. Is if they moneyhat a game that they start to launch on pc day one.
If its their own title then yeah baby. Let me get some use out of my ps5 pro. I've even unplugged it from the tv now to make room for my pc.
Let's agree to disagree...A Nintendo something.![]()
Hahaha i love your comments..Hopefully they start declining like Disney too
All I ask for. Is if they moneyhat a game that they start to launch on pc day one.
If its their own title then yeah baby. Let me get some use out of my ps5 pro. I've even unplugged it from the tv now to make room for my pc.
Nintendo is more healthy than PlayStation right now in both sales and profits, plus the Mario Bros movie, so I would not be so sure...Let's agree to disagree...![]()
Didn't really think of this.The thing is I don't see Sony doing the money hating for third party games as much because they don't really need to. With Xbox now going third party I see more third party doing PC and PS5 especially the Japanese ones. I see Sony investing more in there first party and second party if anything.
Thats some nice low stealth port begging projection for your next xbox "sticker" third party machineJust launch day and date on PC.
Differentiate your hardware by making it good.
I guess they are not confident in their hardware going against pc.
Thats not port begging.Thats some nice low stealth port begging projection for your next xbox "sticker" third party machine
They already released a 1st party Single Player game Day1 on PC... and Switch. Half a year ago.Yeah, I never saw them releasing day one like some people here said they would. It seems the strategy hasn't changed yet.
I am not sure how many are actually jumping ship to PC because Sony has started releasing some titles months later. It has given ammo to old and new PC gamers to say "why own a PlayStation?" But the reality is what you pointed out. They do not bring them all, and they do not bring them day and date. There is still a significant reason to own a PlayStation console.
Well that's not stopped certain people begging them to follow Microsoft's strategy.
First they begged them to follow the day and date strategy for the subscription service, and now they are begging them to follow the PC day one strategy.
I wonder why.
I always chuckled when the common sentiment was "day-and-date soon" for all PlayStation releases. While that was a possibility, it never seemed likely. This strategy was always going to be a sliding scale that's incredibly easy to adjust in either direction, even if the impact of the implementation has longer lasting effects and Sony now has a lot more data to see that impact.
They are making record revenue/profits so I don't think they care.Too late. you've already devalued the brand. The cat is out of the bag.
Maybe the terms of sale (or buy back) were that future games remain timed exclusive on PS.Which I thought might have been a day one thing once Kojima bought the Death Stranding IP
I think this was always a possibility while Xbox was a player ... now PC/handheld is their main competitor.. so things may have changed and may change even more in the future with FP games simply dont coming out on pc. But who knows.I always chuckled when the common sentiment was "day-and-date soon" for all PlayStation releases. While that was a possibility, it never seemed likely. This strategy was always going to be a sliding scale that's incredibly easy to adjust in either direction, even if the impact of the implementation has longer lasting effects and Sony now has a lot more data to see that impact.
Yeah, it's amazing. You got Playstation fanboys, PC fanboys, Xbox fanboys pretending to be PC fanboys and everything in-between. There's enough diversity in this thread to start a new AAA studio.Man, these sorts of threads really bring out the lunatic fanboys, eh?
Yeah, it's amazing. You got Playstation fanboys, PC fanboys, Xbox fanboys pretending to be PC fanboys and everything in-between. There's enough diversity in this thread to start a new AAA studio.
If they didnt care, they would not be doing a 180 and telling their investors about it.They are making record revenue/profits so I don't think they care.
What 180?? Thread is about them continuing what they are doing.If they didnt care, they would not be doing a 180 and telling their investors about it.
I think this was always a possibility while Xbox was a player ... now PC/handheld is their main competitor.. so things may have changed and may change even more in the future with FP games simply dont coming out on pc. But who knows.
Respect to PS fans? If PS fans need this, they fucking suck. Seriously lame sentiment. I like Sony games. I bought a PS5 to play Sony games. I am a fan, but they disrespect me by making me either by their console and blow 600 bucks or wait a year to play it on my nice PC. There is no respect there and its not even clear that people like me are worth it to them. I mean yeah I will buy all their first party games that are SP, but I am not buying 3rd party or subbing, or anything else and I would buy the games on PC day one. I guess I am profitable to them but I also got my system at launch and back then maybe someone more profitable could have had my unit.Sony exclusive has to remain exclusive or at a very least port some exclusivss to pc after a year or more, but not same launch date. This is also as respect to PS fans. Same with xbox and nintendo, they all have to have exclusives for higher quality and good selling point.
What 180?? Thread is about them continuing what they are doing.
Why don't you sell it?All I ask for. Is if they moneyhat a game that they start to launch on pc day one.
If its their own title then yeah baby. Let me get some use out of my ps5 pro. I've even unplugged it from the tv now to make room for my pc.
They said they will not be more aggressive, so whatever "harm" made to the brand will not change.I might be wrong as I don't follow everything these execs are saying, but some of the language seems new in regards to multiplat.
Pretty much this. My PS5 only gets turned on when a exclusive drops (ex Ghost of Yotei).That's good that means their strategy not going day and date works, as your gonna still but it anyway.
But also there are pc gamers who own ps5s who will buy playstation exclusives day and date on ps5.
Yep those are not their Playstation games. They are paying in a way or another to get some exclusivity. Like they are paying fortunes to Marvels too. They are renting those (damaged) IPs.Stellar Blade is 2nd party. Marvel fighting is 2nd party. Nioh 3 is 2nd party. Rise of Ronin is 2nd party. I don't know if they have any 2nd party that isn't on PC from this gen. So that seems like a rule. Death Stranding 2 isn't though, yet.
1st party is hit and miss.
So was concord.Helldivers 2 should be an example of a game that was released simultaneously on day one and was a huge success. They should take inspiration from that.
This is acurate. Even with releasing a game 1 year later on PC, the message was already sent. You dont need a Playstation to play "this" game, just wait and eventually it drops on PC too.Too late. you've already devalued the brand. The cat is out of the bag.
As far as marketing is concerned, perception = reality. They don't want any kind of association of their games with "Xbox". Sticker or Iron fucking branded.XBOX sticker on a ROG ALLY and suddenly PlayStation PC porting.
![]()
The market leader is SIE, not NintendoUnless they have an output like nintendo, it'll hardly make a difference
Nah, PS5 is performing better than their previous consoles in most metrics. Including lots of new to PS users helping them have now the biggest PS active userbase ever, part of them coming from PC.The obvious implication of this is that they KNOW that porting their games to PC harms the value of the PS5,