w1ck3dn1nj4
Member
Thanks! But I'm not sure I understand how this all works still. I feel dumb. I'll come back to this post when I have a clear state of mind.
No I'm the dumb one actually. I forgot to account for the fact that Samsung’s paying the difference, not gross. So max theoretical value is still $200 because
Cash value = 200 - y - (x - y)
Edit: LOL let me try again since I’ve articulated the whole thing rather poorly.
Cash value of deal = net rebate from Samsung (A) + net cash from trade-in (B)
If x = cost of acquisition to you, and y = trade-in value from participating store
A = $200 – y
B = y - x
Therefore cash value of deal = $200 - x
So to get the most out of deal you have to acquire the cheapest shit you can find that meets the $10 criteria if you do not have one readily available. Disparity between cost of acquisition and trade in value doesn’t matter in this case because Samsung not paying $200 gross but the difference. Hope that makes a bit more sense