In simple terms. Google released a phone at a very premium price but lacks the features/performance that such a device should have. And I'm being completely objective. Even if I pretended I liked massive phones, the screen is still disappointing, the battery life is disappointing, there's no unique use of the giant display like even (vomit) samsung does with the note, and whatever else I'm forgetting. It's a flop on every single front in that respect. The only place it's not a flop in is the fact that it runs stock but as great as that is it doesn't mean people will shovel any shit into their mouths for it.
And how is that an ignorant consumer thing to say when I mention that it will definitely flop. You're saying the nexus 6 flopping isn't realistic? The vast majority of android phones recently are giant flops, even the one doing well (samsung) are plummeting at astonishing rates. Why would a high priced very niche (as in giant) device not flop? Throw in the fact that it will have no marketing like usual and it is pretty much guaranteed. Don't see how anything in that statement is ignorant.
Google probably already knows that, I can't imagine they're that stupid. Which is why I think my leading theory that motorola was the only one who wanted to do a nexus device and they did it completely on their own terms. Or not. That's speculation.
I don't get any reasoning of the nexus 6. I really don't. I get the INTENTION. But the execution is piss poor and they should be bashed for it. With that said if I wanted a massive phone I'd still get it over the competition. But that's me. Lover of stock android. Not the general public. They'll just pick up the note 4 or whatever garbage (lol). I'm sure someone will say the nexus 6 isn't for the general public but even the hardcore technerds and devs have been shitting on it for various reasons. It's a disappointing product for everybody. Not say some would be happy to get it, if you're one of them then be happy, that's all that matters. But doesn't make anything I said invalid.
edit: as for the new api stuff. Say what you will but to me there is a big difference between a stock device and a touchwiz one despite similar "backends" which isn't even completely true. It's tinkered with far too much. Of course motorola is excluded.
I just read a wall of text that essentially reads: Nexus 6 is a flop because its not the Note 4.
Are you forgetting the Nexus 6 has the most powerful internals you can buy today? The pricing falls in line with other phones that have Snapdragon 805 SOC's with 13 megapixel shooters.
IMO, Nothing about the phone is a "flop". The majority of reviewers, barring quite a few, seem to be happy with the device, with a few outliers who have nagging issues.
As for your dissapointments:
The screen is the higest resolution you can buy and an AMOLED to boot. We all know Samsung provided an older generation panel, and hence the battery drain. In any case, if the Galaxy S4 panel is "Shit" and a "flop" to you, than by all means - the Note 4 is there for you to purchase.
The camera has the same sensor as the LG G3, and the Android RAW format is yet to be supported in the software. This makes it abundantly evident that the final camera software is not finished, and more importantly, the reviewers who claimed the camera was pretty good in everything except low light - if that is a "flop" to you, than it's a flop.
Finally, the device has front facing stereo speakers. Something, as far as I can recall, the HTC One only has. If all these things sound like "Flops", than by all means buy a Note 4.
I'll stick with Stock Android. Oh and I am an owner of an original Note, Note 2, and Note 3. I have had my fair share of headaches with touchwiz slowing down over time and absolutely bloating up the OS after major updates. The original Galaxy Note when updated to Ice Cream Sandwich became an abortion to use. The same will happen with the Note 4. Samsung does not do clean updates. People forget that.