Ranger X said:Well, you can spare with anything you want and seperately so but personally it doesn't make the game necessaruly "better" for me.
I like to see how much health I still have, wich weapon i'm selected on, etc. I could spare with the buttons up right and maybe the radar since you can open the map anyways.
.
MirageDwarf said:What's the story of "." in all posts?
No need to play any other games. Each game has four actions (linked to particular achievements) giving you 100 points in total and four rewards you can redeem for that same amount. So you can get all rewards from playing the one game. One of the rewards is even a theme; worth $3. It's a clever way of adding extra value to achievements.RainbowByte said:I think you have to look at it from another standpoint where its something they could have included in the game instead of making you play another one of their titles to unlock it.
Its similar to people that endure playing shitty games to inflate their gamerscore.
Later on in the game, they'll drop throwing knives, smoke bombs and other things that are worth more.skip said:so is looting their corpse. probably intentional so you're not tempted to hang around and loot 5 or 6 bodies after every battle.
Zeliard said:I don't particularly mind it, since a more guided experience at the start of an open-world game before you're set free can be a good thing, but are the beginning portions of the game really as lengthy as the reviews say it is?
Before you're in full control of Ezio and can go anywhere - basically, before the point where the game truly starts. Some of the reviews are saying it can take 4-5 hours before you're there, which seems a bit high.
Freedom = $1.05 said:Shouldn't be too much of a shock. AC1 had one of the most drawn out tutorials I've ever EVER ever seen.
Zeliard said:I don't particularly mind it, since a more guided experience at the start of an open-world game before you're set free can be a good thing, but are the beginning portions of the game really as lengthy as the reviews say it is?
Before you're in full control of Ezio and can go anywhere - basically, before the point where the game truly starts. Some of the reviews are saying it can take 4-5 hours before you're there, which seems a bit high.
Zeliard said:I don't particularly mind it, since a more guided experience at the start of an open-world game before you're set free can be a good thing, but are the beginning portions of the game really as lengthy as the reviews say it is?
Before you're in full control of Ezio and can go anywhere - basically, before the point where the game truly starts. Some of the reviews are saying it can take 4-5 hours before you're there, which seems a bit high.
Otheradam said:It's people agreeing with what was quoted but too lazy to type "i agree", so they put a period instead.
Ranger X said:This is bull. People except to be a full assassin from the get go and it's not the point of the game. There's a progression of the character now and a story. It gradual. You always learn new things and Ezio BECOMES an Assassin. This is where some people are missing the point. If there wasn't thing start and they were plunged right in the middle of the game they would also complain (meh, starts wierd, don't understand the story, no character developement, etc)
Fact is that there's a small part in the present at first that is useful for the context of the whole game. It takes like 1 hour. After that you'll be Ezio but not yet an assassin. There's like 9 quick missions after where it's kind of an integrated tutorial but it also familiarise yourself with all the main characters.
Those whole thing I did describe here isn't 5 hours...
.
lawblob said:80 minutes in, I don't think im' anywhere near playing as "the assassin." It feels like im' just at the beginning of random-other-dude's adventure.
It's not bad, though. Its pretty interesting in its own right.
Lyte Edge said:Despite hating the original game, I'm thinking of getting this and trading Episodes From Liberty City (just not feeling it) towards it.
Has anyone done and in-depth comparisons between the 360 and PS3 versions yet?
Y2Kev said:It's amazing how asscrud2 is like.... a game. It blows away the first one in terms of being a game. Do you know what I mean? It's like actually a game.
Yeah.
lensoftruth.com did a comparison.Lyte Edge said:Despite hating the original game, I'm thinking of getting this and trading Episodes From Liberty City (just not feeling it) towards it.
Has anyone done and in-depth comparisons between the 360 and PS3 versions yet?
bistromathics said:oh my god i have to keep watching these unskippable cutscenes this is the worst first impression i've had in a long time
Animator said:How do you counter in battle?
As is usual with multiplatform games these days, there really isnt much of a cosmetic difference between the 360 and PS3 versions of the game; the 360 edition looks slightly sharper, while the PS3 is a little fuzzier and sports slightly warmer colors
Y2Kev said:It's amazing how asscrud2 is like.... a game. It blows away the first one in terms of being a game. Do you know what I mean? It's like actually a game.
Yeah.
RustyO said:Thinking about grabbing this maybe tomorrow...
How does it compare versus AC1?
I kind of liked AC1, had some moments, looked gorgeous, but, how can I put it? The game play was lacking unfortunately.
The side quests were limited / boring (Pickpocket, protect, climb, rinse/repeat).
Didn't like the fact that no matter how I tried, most of the assassinations boiled down to get to area, trigger cut-scene, then perform the assassination. I wanted a lot more flexibility into how/when I performed my job.
But I guess most of my complaints of the first game are quite common... so, worth getting? Or just give it a bit of time first (Maybe finishing AC1 would be a good idea)
RustyO said:Thinking about grabbing this maybe tomorrow...
How does it compare versus AC1?
I kind of liked AC1, had some moments, looked gorgeous, but, how can I put it? The game play was lacking unfortunately.
The side quests were limited / boring (Pickpocket, protect, climb, rinse/repeat).
Didn't like the fact that no matter how I tried, most of the assassinations boiled down to get to area, trigger cut-scene, then perform the assassination. I wanted a lot more flexibility into how/when I performed my job.
But I guess most of my complaints of the first game are quite common... so, worth getting? Or just give it a bit of time first (Maybe finishing AC1 would be a good idea)
CloakedPuppet said:Pretty nice CE I must say. I realize that someone posted pics of the PS3 one but...
Ranger X said:RT + X after you learn it.
(R1 + Square on PS3)
.
Ranger X said:This is really bullshit. I also wonder what the hell their TV is and if they turned the full RGB option and super white option ON. They don't look knowledgeable enough to do that.
I wouldn't even be surprised their image simply is more crushed on the 360 because of the TV they use or again because they could be on component cables instead of HDMI.
Games are also in the same resolution with the same textures. God I hate pseudo experts.
.
Ken Masters said:can anyone confirm what IGN AU said about the PS3 version being that much worse? I thought in 2009 they would be identical
Ken Masters said:can anyone confirm what IGN AU said about the PS3 version being that much worse? I thought in 2009 they would be identical
The PlayStation 3 version does suffer from some frame rate jitters, more frequent texture fade-in, and lesser color saturation. Both versions are still attractive, however, and apart from a few small flaws, you rarely get the feeling that visual compromises were made to make the game's open world run smoothly.
As is usual with multiplatform games these days, there really isnt much of a cosmetic difference between the 360 and PS3 versions of the game; the 360 edition looks slightly sharper, while the PS3 is a little fuzzier and sports slightly warmer colors
Sean said:I've only played for about half an hour, but it's pretty cool so far.
I like how the tutorial parts have been integrated into the story (climbing up to your girlfriends window, then having sex with her and being chased away by the fathers guards, etc).
Zeliard said:Christ @ Lucy's character model this time around. :lol
Solo said:AC1 Lucy, looking at least somewhat Bell-ish:
AC2 Lucy, looking somewhat trollish:
WTF did they do to her nose? :lol :lol