serenewarfare
Banned
You're in the wrong, though. I hope you realized that and that's why you quit instead of thinking you aren't going to reach some terribly wrong soul. I think MoS is as bad as Konnan and Michael Hayes. I had a very, very strong and negative reaction to the movie. A lot of people did. It is okay for those people to have those very, very strong and negative reactions. They can be very, very strong and negative and be legitimate and not hyperbole. And even if it is hyperbole, why would that make you so grumpy about it?
I'm not so much grumpy as I am just trying to separate Internet opinion from popular opinion. Like I said, if people don't like something, that is their right. But, if you look around at really any of the review aggregators, MoS was not received nearly as poorly in a general sense as the reaction here would have you believe. 55 Metacritic, 7.5 User score. 56% RT, 76% User score. A- CinemaScore. Any sort of metric measures it from below average to good.
I didn't stop because I was wrong, that's irrelevant to my point. I stopped because the point I was trying to make (Internet opinion on the film is wildly different from every other measure for some reason) is one that won't change the opinion of someone who didn't like the film. I brought up hyperbole to point out the radical difference in the reaction. So, yeah, maybe hyperbole is the wrong word. But the "Man of Steel is awful" opinion seems to be different from general opinion on the film. That was my point. I'm not telling anyone how they can or should feel. Doesn't matter to me whether you like it or not.