DonkeyPunchJr
World’s Biggest Weeb
yeah this one looks like a skip
WTF you can't even kill NPCs? That was one of the things I liked in Outer Worlds. Once I finished the sidequests in some area I'd go on a killing spree and dispose of the whole town.
yeah this one looks like a skip
Its a parody at this point. I knew the game was trash after the director was doing damage control before release. The characters look like shit and the promotion videos had modern-day Obsidian writing written all over it.
Well it does have the same bisexual lighting.From teh videos I've been watching, it really reminds me of a First Person Veilgard, writing, art style and all.
It's not peak Obsidian though, that's the point.Just to be clear, I'm just not jumping in day 0 at premium $138 CAD. I still think there's things in it that seems interesting, just a wait and see approach with how more peoples feel about the game after playing it and or in the future at lower price.
I find it quite silly though the dancing around and circle jerking of peoples wanting this to fail. Cmon guys. Stop the warrior attitude. I think that the fact we don't get a peak obsidian RPG means every gamers lose, everyone.
Eh....the score ain't mid though. Some of the things said about the game are concerning, but 80 is a great score.
With everything leading up to the release, is anyone surprised about the mid score? I'm surprised it isn't lower. I knew the game would be trash when the director started virtue signaling. No game coming from these people ends up being memorable.
Can say that I'm pretty much in the same boat as @HeisenbergFX4
Outer Worlds was at 85, and a lot of gamers felt that was just OK, and disappointing compared to the games that Obsidian did previously.Mid score?
81 aggregate is mid score?
![]()
When an argument begins to falter, you simply move the line itself to benefit the argument.81 aggregate is mid score?
You should try watching the video, unfortunately the one on Avowed is not satire.
But it would be interesting to find out who wanted to whistleblow and sent him the key.
Outer Worlds was at 85, and a lot of gamers felt that was just OK, and disappointing compared to the games that Obsidian did previously.
All things considered this game has "mid", "generic" and may I say "AI made" written absolutely all over it. The ~80 meta was to be expected, it's a joke and everyone knows it.Ok? That doesn't mean an 81 aggregate score is 'mid' though. The review scaling perception on forums is really fucked, lol.
80mc rating is mid apparentlyJust as expected since the reveal trailer, game is mid as fuck. Certainly fits the name, AVOID.
80mc rating is mid apparently
This graph will exists and be accurate till the end of time. I don't agree with it.
Previous Obsidian RPG got an 85Ok? That doesn't mean an 81 aggregate score is 'mid' though. The review scaling perception on forums is really fucked, lol.
My man: Always lenient and neutral to woke flawed gamesWhen an argument begins to falter, you simply move the line itself to benefit the argument.
Hellblade 2 is also sitting at 81 and it is maybe the most boring, uninteresting video game I have ever played.Ok? That doesn't mean an 81 aggregate score is 'mid' though. The review scaling perception on forums is really fucked, lol.
Mid score?
81 aggregate is mid score?
![]()
What I mean is it's a good enough game to waste time on, but not a great game. So it's not a game I'd ever go out and buy by itself for 70 plus dollars, especially when there's a whole lot of other upcoming games. It is however a game I'll download and play since I'm subscribed to game pass.What game isn't good for gamepass?
81 can definitely be mid when high profile games are guaranteed to score between 70 and 100.
Yes it is? Just asking this makes you look like a clueless newcomer to video games.
People are whack when it comes to review scores sometimes. One guy here thought the silent hill 2 remake was a failure because it got an 86 or something like that.Mid score?
81 aggregate is mid score?
![]()
If you care that much then you can assume that all games hate men/are woke/are DEI infested.Request for future reviews, please warns us game hates men/is woke/DEI infested like this one.
Neutral, yes. Lenient, no. I don't rate the games people consider woke on a different scale. That means I also don't simply dock points just because they have those elements. It's a lazy way of reviewing to me. As much as some here don't like the guy, Skillup had the right idea with his Veilguard review and if I were to point to any review as the standard of how to approach a review the correct way, it would be that video.My man: Always lenient and neutral to woke flawed games
It's not just you, and I'm just speaking the truth, as I see it happen here all the time.Also my man: Always harsh to me when I was being cheeky.
With opinions like this, that graph meme made a decade or so ago has been incredibly prophetic.
Opencritic labels 81 as a "Strong" reviewed game.
Metacritic labels 80 as a "Generally favorable" reviewed game.
But there's always some who might think anything below 90 is mid.
Colt Eastwood highly recommends
Colt Eastwood highly recommends
80 is the score modern Ubisoft games orbitate, i don't need any other proof that any crap with high production values will be at this kind of range, reviewers are just too soft and scared of losing their privileges, so yeah, that scale is true.
We need new western devs.Some of ya'll need a new hobby.
Or just grow up, finally.Some of ya'll need a new hobby.
We need new western devs.
I will never understand this modern scoring scale where the average score is actually utter trash. Makes no fucking sense whatsoever.