yurinka
Member
It wasn't a public stand, it was an internal mail that Jim Ryan sent to employees and someone leaked it to Bloomberg.Didn't Ryan or someone from Sony taking a huge public stand
Last edited:
It wasn't a public stand, it was an internal mail that Jim Ryan sent to employees and someone leaked it to Bloomberg.Didn't Ryan or someone from Sony taking a huge public stand
I hear ya. Still depends on the career sector.Manual labor skews heavily towards men, while office heavily towards women. I have seen tons of women work on office, while more men worked on the floor.
For Sony, most of their work are office, were you will find alot of women on that field.
70 vs 4?
I think there is a big problem, when that much gets promoted, while the other side gets 4. You dont get almost 70 men to be qualified for promotion, while there are 4 women, who get those promotion.
But fuck the rest. The representation is far from being 50/50, and although it should probably be at least 70/30, most women are factually and statistically less interested in working in fields like STEM, tech or video games.
Its idiom for things that are hard to believe. You wrote that women are less to ask for promotion. That 70/4 pants something else.
for every 5-8 men, there should be 1 women. here its close to 18 per 1 women. For every 18 men, there is 1 women that got the promotion. It doesnt make a sense at all.
Only possible answer, is that the women working there are low, compared to men.
Dangerous game you are playing......Its idiom for things that are hard to believe. You wrote that women are less to ask for promotion. That 70/4 pants something else.
for every 5-8 men, there should be 1 women. here its close to 18 per 1 women. For every 18 men, there is 1 women that got the promotion. It doesnt make a sense at all.
Only possible answer, is that the women working there are low, compared to men.
Men usually skews towards labor job. Anything that is related to labor such as engineering, mechanics would have alot of men. For women, their physical limitation is what gets them discriminated. Plus the decade of men dominating these fields, which fosters, the mentality that these type of jobs are for men, and not for women.This is just not true. Men go into engineering more. There were hardly ANY women/girls in my college courses back in the day. There is no "discrimination" on who is admitted, or who is to apply to those programs. There could be a number of reasons why that is the case, but it ain't discrimination.
That is the dark side that people overlook in these situation. Women get alot of good treatment in these areas. We men suffer from higher ups overworking us to death. This type of treatment have been going for a long time. Its not limited to office field, but in all fields.Men also tend to put in longer hours at offices. Software engineering is a white collar job. If one group tends to put in longer hours who is more likely to get those promotions? And yes studies back this up.
This is when they are saying something work related. There was a show, that highlighted these "Interruption" problems. It usually comes from disgruntled men, that dont like the idea, that a women can talk to them about the work. This is a big issue in big companies, where everyone is competing.And women complaining that they were "interrupted" and chalking it up to being a woman is stupid. Everyone gets interrupted, including every man who has had a job where discussions take place. Men are out there eating a shit sandwich every day of the week, just like everyone else. The idea that everything that inconveniences you or displeases you happens to you because you are a woman is absurd. I can't imagine going through life with that attitude.
Dangerous game you are playing......
At a multi national company like Sony, if only 8 women complain in a predominantly office based environment, then it's statistically not likely to be an issue.
See what happens?
Why do you think that? Whats it based on?
Based on what you pointed out.Its not just "skills" or experience, or time put in. Its actually asking/pressing for the promotion because you think you deserve it as well. Women are traditionally less likely to think they deserve a promotion, or to ask for it, or be aggressive in the process if they do ask for it.
If I were a woman I'd work hard and ask for a promotion based on my hard work, then if I didnt get it I would reflect on why that might be.
Kuranghi made a point, that women tend to ask less for promotion. This was based on those points.Dangerous game you are playing......
At a multi national company like Sony, if only 8 women complain in a predominantly office based environment, then it's statistically not likely to be an issue.
See what happens?
Every single thing they have described here has happened to me and I am not a woman.The women describe a range of behaviors across multiple U.S.-based PlayStation offices, including demeaning comments, unwelcome advances, a lack of attention paid to their work or ideas and, most frequently, a sense that it was harder for women to be promoted in the company.
Man this entire post is made-up nonsense. This is nothing personal, but you are out of your league in this discussion dude. I think we should stick to games rather than acting like we are experts on the internal culture of a multinational corporation neither of us work at.Men usually skews towards labor job. Anything that is related to labor such as engineering, mechanics would have alot of men. For women, their physical limitation is what gets them discriminated. Plus the decade of men dominating these fields, which fosters, the mentality that these type of jobs are for men, and not for women.
That is the dark side that people overlook in these situation. Women get alot of good treatment in these areas. We men suffer from higher ups overworking us to death. This type of treatment have been going for a long time. Its not limited to office field, but in all fields.
This is when they are saying something work related. There was a show, that highlighted these "Interruption" problems. It usually comes from disgruntled men, that dont like the idea, that a women can talk to them about the work. This is a big issue in big companies, where everyone is competing.
Based on what you pointed out.
But when you promote 70 men, and only 4 women, then that isnt promotion on skills.
What are the positions in question? Are women entering those fields per college major statistics?70 vs 4?
I think there is a big problem, when that much gets promoted, while the other side gets 4. You dont get almost 70 men to be qualified for promotion, while there are 4 women, who get those promotion.
How is my narrative flawed, when there are 70 men who got promoted. While the women working there, only 4 got promoted. No one is asking the same number of men. Its just that these huge disparity shouldn't exist. There could be 70/30 split. Not 95/5 split. You could have 50/24 split.Your narrative is flawed.
What's the distribution of men to women on those teams? If there were 74 employees total and 4 were women, and there are 10 promotions available, it's "statistically impossible" to promote the same number of women as men. And that's ignoring how qualified these people are.
How is my narrative flawed, when there are 70 men who got promoted. While the women working there, only 4 got promoted. No one is asking the same number of men. Its just that these huge disparity shouldn't exist. There could be 70/30 split. Not 95/5 split. You could have 50/24 split.
What are the positions in question? Are women entering those fields per college major statistics?
Its for senior roles.senior roles during “calibration sessions.”
Dude you have no clue how many women were even there to begin with. If the office was 10 women and 100 men (not far fetched at all as its stem and skews that way) and 4 out of 10 got promoted, thats 60%. You don't have the data. No one does. Going by a hunch is so emotional and sjw. Logic, and reason, please.I am sorry, but that shouldnt be the case. If that was the case, then they wouldnt have put this lawsuit there. No fool believes that 70 men can go ask for promotion, while only 4 women ask for promotion. If the numbers were 15, that would have been somewhat on the grey line. But 4, that paints something different. It discourages other female employees, and that their contribution means nothing to the company.
Ok. My point stands.Its for senior roles.
Because it shows other women arent really that important. It creates work tension, were 1 group gets favorable chances, while the other just sits down, and get nothing.Why shouldn't it exist?
Because it shows other women arent really that important.
It creates work tension, were 1 group gets favorable chances, while the other just sits down, and get nothing.
Well according to your maths, and those 70/4 promotion, there should be 35 women working for that company, compared to 700 men. Also, this isnt 60% promotion. Its 94.3% vs 5.7%. for every 17 men promoted, there is 1 women promoted.Dude you have no clue how many women were even there to begin with. If the office was 10 women and 100 men (not far fetched at all as its stem and skews that way) and 4 out of 6 got promoted, thats 60%. You don't have the data. No one does. Going by a hunch is so emotional and sjw. Logic, and reason, please.
And ape escape! That is off the utmost importance!Where is Jason Schreier? He needs to get down to Sony HQ immediately. I don't care if you can't find your LGBTQ pin, no time can be wasted. They need a white knight down there ASAP.
You could also ask them about Crunch while you are at it.
seriously? Dont you see the irony on your post?Because you're in a niche work enviroment for your sex? How does that show you're less important? On the contrary you should feel more important
Its either A) the company is being dominated by men, which shows gender disparity or B) There is clear discrimination against women.That isn't a result of gender disparity
Well according to your maths, and those 70/4 promotion, there should be 35 women working for that company, compared to 700 men. Also, this isnt 60% promotion. Its 94.3% vs 5.7%. for every 17 men promoted, there is 1 women promoted.
??????So you want all these groups to get discriminated against?
Asian, black, LBQT, Hispanic, neurodivergent, Muslim, Jewish and Shintoists.
Or it's only OK if they have one of those +woman?
I don't think you understand what irony isseriously? Dont you see the irony on your post?
Its either A) the company is being dominated by men, which shows gender disparity
B) There is clear discrimination against women.
If its that point, then my argument is unwarranted. Since men would have alot of candidates compared the few women that work there.Which isn't inherently bad
Of course.a lack of attention paid to their work or ideas and, most frequently, a sense that it was harder for women to be promoted in the company.
Ok than stop trolling.If its that point, then my argument is unwarranted. Since men would have alot of candidates compared the few women that work there.
How is that trolling? Gender disparity would have tons of men, compared to women. The article doesnt mention that. If Sony does have that, all my previous would worthless. But if its not, then they got a big problem.Ok than stop trolling.
Just because the world is 50/50 men and women, does not mean everything is life is split 50/50.How is that trolling? Gender disparity would have tons of men, compared to women. The article doesnt mention that. If Sony does have that, all my previous would worthless. But if its not, then they got a big problem.
We are just going with what the article provided us.
"demeaning comments, unwelcome advances..."
What kind of accusations are that ?!
Of course you will have "unwelcome advances". You are a person, not a rock on the parking lot... someone going to flirt with you sooner or later.
I've not read too deep into this but I already have a mental image.
I work in a huge international company and there are always assholes. It's work.. with people. The company policy is open and I can't imagine it's different in playstation US. Most of HR managers are women too. They do not discriminate.
Depending what positions. We have many engineering positions open but most of people applying are men. It's just facts.
Every single thing they have described here has happened to me and I am not a woman.
One of the comments even suggested that they were interrupted in meetings. EVERYONE gets interrupted in meetings. Even my bosses. Especially in zoom meetings. Thats normal.
Dont believe everything you read, especially sexual harrassment.What the fuck ?
You're seriously saying women should just let it happen and not complain about unwelcome flirtation and sexual advances/comments at work ?
A lot of oddly dude-bro posts here just outright dismissing this, pretty fucking disappointing.
Gender disparity is entirely up to the gender, in media its 80/20 men versus women where every boss i have had was a woman.How is that trolling? Gender disparity would have tons of men, compared to women. The article doesnt mention that. If Sony does have that, all my previous would worthless. But if its not, then they got a big problem.
We are just going with what the article provided us.
What the fuck ?
You're seriously saying women should just let it happen and not complain about unwelcome flirtation and sexual advances/comments at work ?
A lot of oddly dude-bro posts here just outright dismissing this, pretty fucking disappointing.
??????
Who is talking about them. The article mentions between men and women. I am staying on that topic.
The article gave us this piece of info.I am because you're whole 70 to 4 argument is totally flawed if it's just stripped down to a male feminist agenda of "Generic men".
Marie Harrington, a veteran of Sony Online Entertainment and Sony PlayStation for more than 16 years, cited a lack of women considered for senior roles during “calibration sessions.” During one session, she said, only four women were considered for promotions, compared to nearly 70 men.