• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Breaking: Israel launches Operation Protective Edge against Hamas in Gaza

Status
Not open for further replies.

LNBL

Member
Netanyahu warned that Israel’s appetite for restraint wouldn’t last long. “We accepted the Egyptian cease-fire proposal to give an opportunity to demilitarize the Gaza Strip from rockets. If Hamas continues to fire at Israel, Israel will have the international legitimacy to take action,” he said at midday.

Soon after, the IAF carried out a single air strike on the northern Gaza Strip, with no causalities reported.

It might be hard to fathom why Hamas leaders would blow an opportunity for a cease-fire, given the 192 Gazans killed and over 1,400 wounded in the past week, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry. The reason: the proposal fashioned by Egypt was not discussed with Hamas leaders, who feel it suits Israel far more than them.

Hamas and Islamic Jihad leaders say they were not consulted, and the proposal does not hit on some of the basic elements they outlined as a condition of a truce. Specifically, they are asking for an end to the “siege” of Gaza, an amorphous term that refers to the economic and physical isolation Israel has sought to impose on the territory, in an effort to squeeze Hamas and potentially turn frustrated Gazans against it.

http://time.com/2986107/israel-gaza-hamas-ceasefire/

For the ones that keep bringing up the point that Israel agreed to the cease fire.

Kind of hard to accept a peace offer that you had no part in forming and one that does not help the occupation.
 

Quotient

Member
Do you think Israel would agree to a cease-fire if it was proposed by ISIS and Syria? The regime of Egypt isn't friendly to Hamas, they can't expect an honest peace process with a party that hates them more than Israel. Don't forget Hamas was closely tied to the former Egyptian regime that was deposed and banished by the current one.

I don't think Israel would agree to a peace process proposed by ISIS, Syria or even Iran, but Israel is the "winner" here. Hamas just need to agree to a truce, if anything to prevent any more Palestinian deaths.
 

Joni

Member
I don't think Israel would agree to a peace process proposed by ISIS, Syria or even Iran, but Israel is the "winner" here. Hamas just need to agree to a truce, if anything to prevent any more Palestinian deaths.
It won't prevent any deaths, it would just slow them down. People don't tend to thrive in ghetto's.
 

Chichikov

Member
Heh well around one billion people want all Israelis to die basically so I don't think you're going to get far with this irrational hate contest.
I responded to the assertion that most Israelis care about Palestinians casualties.
They don't.
This is not a hate-off.

Hamas did reject a cease-fire agreement that Israel agreed to and upheld. At the end of the day it's their own people dying. Their resistance is not working. The world powers are behind Israel on it's "right to defend itself". Everything is in the Israeli's favor, Hamas needs to agree to a cease fire.
Hamas is on the record right now that it is willing for a 10 years truce in exchange for "release of re-arrested Palestinian prisoners who were let go in the Schalit deal, the opening of Gaza-Israel border crossings in order to allow citizens and goods to pass through, and international supervision of the Gazan seaport in place of the current Israeli blockade."
Seem pretty reasonable to me.
But Israel is refusing to even enter talks with Hamas, which has always been its policy.
 

Cromat

Member
I responded to the assertion that most Israelis care about Palestinians casualties.
They don't.
This is not a hate-off.


Hamas is on the record right now that it is willing for a 10 years truce in exchange for "release of re-arrested Palestinian prisoners who were let go in the Schalit deal, the opening of Gaza-Israel border crossings in order to allow citizens and goods to pass through, and international supervision of the Gazan seaport in place of the current Israeli blockade."
Seem pretty reasonable to me.
But Israel is refusing to even enter talks with Hamas, which has always been its policy.

The ceasefire agreement had both sides coming to Egypt to negotiate over all issues within 48 hours. Hamas rejected it.
 

Kagutaba

Member
What would you have the Palestinians do?
They are living under military occupation without basic human rights in the west bank and under crippling blockade in Gaza.

This conflict is lopsided, Israel could end this conflict by force in less then an hour and there is nothing Hamas could do about it. Israel will not do this of course, because it would lead to even more Palestinian civilian causalities. The Palestinians need to realize that they are simply not in a situation were they can wage war on their neighbor(which is what they are currently doing) without harming themselves ten-fold. They also need to realize that they can't have a government that wish for the extermination of Israel, no negotiations can be expected to take place if that's on the founding charter of a government party.
 

Chichikov

Member
This conflict is lopsided, Israel could end this conflict by force in less then an hour and there is nothing Hamas could do about it. Israel will not do this of course, because it would lead to even more Palestinian civilian causalities. The Palestinians need to realize that they are simply not in a situation were they can wage war on their neighbor(which is what they are currently doing) without harming themselves ten-fold. They also need to realize that they can't have a government that wish for the extermination of Israel, no negotiations can be expected to take place if that's one of the founding charters of a government party.
I'm not sure I understand your argument.
Yeah, Israel can kill a ridiculous amount of Palestinians, much more than they do right now.
You're saying that's the reason the Palestinians should just give up on their hope of getting basic human right in the west bank or removing the blockade?
 

yarden24

Member
I responded to the assertion that most Israelis care about Palestinians casualties.
They don't.
This is not a hate-off.


Hamas is on the record right now that it is willing for a 10 years truce in exchange for "release of re-arrested Palestinian prisoners who were let go in the Schalit deal, the opening of Gaza-Israel border crossings in order to allow citizens and goods to pass through, and international supervision of the Gazan seaport in place of the current Israeli blockade."
Seem pretty reasonable to me.
But Israel is refusing to even enter talks with Hamas, which has always been its policy.

israel will never agree to those conditions just based on the fact hamas will continue its arms race gaining more and more rockets, international supervision never actually works.
 
And they're still getting settlements, what does killing more Israelis solve?

No Israelis died during the Oslo Accords (well, the Israeli prime minister did but by someone else). What's so hard to keep doing this instead? Why did they bother with another Intifada at the same time these talks went down?

Also, I wouldn't call it peaceful. There where many Palestinian terror groups kidnapping Israelis or holding them hostage.


They don't need occupation. They just need to accept a state without rockets and weapons.

Yeah, West Bank, where the rockets aren't coming from, are indeed getting more settlements
 

Kagutaba

Member
I'm not sure I understand your argument.
Yeah, Israel can kill a ridiculous amount of Palestinians, much more than they do right now.
You're saying that's the reason the Palestinians should just give up on their hope of getting basic human right in the west bank or removing the blockade?

I'm saying the Palestinians can only worsen this conflict and their own situation by supporting Hamas in their attack on Israel, there can be no military victory here, Hamas has it's own agenda and it goes counter to the interests of the Palestinian people.
 

elhav

Member
It's funny to see how many people here believe Hamas would actually agree, or follow an agreement with Israel. I'm not talking about Abu Mazen here, which showed he is willing to get to an agreement. I'm talking Hamas, as they control Gaza. Read this:

http://www.adl.org/anti-semitism/muslim-arab-world/c/hamas-in-their-own-words.html

These are quotes from Hamas officials and spokespeople that admit their anti-semitism and hate towards jews. They admit they want all of "Palestine" and don't even bother to hide their affection towards other Muslim extremists that killed innocents all over the world.

Hamas can often paint a picture that shows Israel as the one starting al the wars, but is that really the case? Before Israel's operation started, do you remember what happened?

3 Israeli boys were murdered by Hamas activists, afterwards a palestinian boy was murdered by several citizens that were extreme and hateful, but not by the government or military. Hamas saw it as an excuse to start bombing Israel with a shit ton of missiles and trying to carry out suicide bombings(that were prevented thanks to the IDF) immediately after the Palestinian boy was murdered.

Israel gave them 48 hours to stop shooting, without even attacking Gaza, and when they didn't stop shooting, Israel gave them an extra fucking day to stop it before Israel starts an operation.

The rest you already know.
 

LNBL

Member
It's funny to see how many people here believe Hamas would actually agree, or follow an agreement with Israel. I'm not talking about Abu Mazen here, which showed he is willing to get to an agreement. I'm talking Hamas, as they control Gaza. Read this:

http://www.adl.org/anti-semitism/muslim-arab-world/c/hamas-in-their-own-words.html

These are quotes from Hamas officials and spokespeople that admit their anti-semitism and hate towards jews. They admit they want all of "Palestine" and don't even bother to hide their affection towards other Muslim extremists that killed innocents all over the world.

Hamas can often paint a picture that shows Israel as the one starting al the wars, but is that really the case? Before Israel's operation started, do you remember what happened?

3 Israeli boys were murdered by Hamas activists, afterwards a palestinian boy was murdered by several citizens that were extreme and hateful, but not by the government or military. Hamas saw it as an excuse to start bombing Israel with a shit ton of missiles and trying to carry out suicide bombings(that were prevented thanks to the IDF) immediately after the Palestinian boy was murdered.

Israel gave them 48 hours to stop shooting, without even attacking Gaza, and when they didn't stop shooting, Israel gave them an extra fucking day to stop it before Israel starts an operation.

The rest you already know.

Where is your proof that Hamas killed those boys? Hamas denies any involvement with those deaths. I have yet to read a report of results from an investigation into the deaths of these kids.
 

Kagutaba

Member
Hamas is on the record right now that it is willing for a 10 years truce in exchange for "release of re-arrested Palestinian prisoners who were let go in the Schalit deal, the opening of Gaza-Israel border crossings in order to allow citizens and goods to pass through, and international supervision of the Gazan seaport in place of the current Israeli blockade."
Seem pretty reasonable to me.
But Israel is refusing to even enter talks with Hamas, which has always been its policy.

More like ten day truce, to refill the missile-stockpile and then it's business as usual. Hamas' word means nothing, their goal is the extermination of Israel and every action they take is in service of that goal.
 

Cromat

Member
what does recognizing israel mean? what do you want them to say/do?

That they recognize the state of Israel and won't keep trying to destroy it, and that the solution to the conflict would be achieved through negotiations. That would be helpful.
 
I have not weighed in on this for obvious reasons of nothing ever getting resolved,

but the counter-measures taken on part of Israel and hugely disproportionate.

Telling 100 000 civilians in Gaza to evacuate is insanely disproportionate no matter the conflict or war.

Yeah, 3 teens got kidnapped, that is awful yeah, but it should be resolved in a police manner not a military manner.

That's all i have to say, disproportionate.
 
Where is your proof that Hamas killed those boys? Hamas denies any involvement with those deaths. I have yet to read a report of results from an investigation into the deaths of these kids.

Not only that, but let's not forget that on May 20 two Palestinian teens were killed while posing no threat:

http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/may/20/cctv-footage-palestinian-teenagers-shot-dead-video

So if we really want to play elhav's 'who started it' game, perhaps we could start there?
 

Kagutaba

Member
It's funny to see how many people here believe Hamas would actually agree, or follow an agreement with Israel. I'm not talking about Abu Mazen here, which showed he is willing to get to an agreement. I'm talking Hamas, as they control Gaza. Read this:

http://www.adl.org/anti-semitism/muslim-arab-world/c/hamas-in-their-own-words.html

These are quotes from Hamas officials and spokespeople that admit their anti-semitism and hate towards jews. They admit they want all of "Palestine" and don't even bother to hide their affection towards other Muslim extremists that killed innocents all over the world.

Hamas can often paint a picture that shows Israel as the one starting al the wars, but is that really the case? Before Israel's operation started, do you remember what happened?

3 Israeli boys were murdered by Hamas activists, afterwards a palestinian boy was murdered by several citizens that were extreme and hateful, but not by the government or military. Hamas saw it as an excuse to start bombing Israel with a shit ton of missiles and trying to carry out suicide bombings(that were prevented thanks to the IDF) immediately after the Palestinian boy was murdered.

Israel gave them 48 hours to stop shooting, without even attacking Gaza, and when they didn't stop shooting, Israel gave them an extra fucking day to stop it before Israel starts an operation.

The rest you already know.

"Hamas can often paint a picture that shows Israel as the one starting all the wars"

Yes they are very good at this, Hamas is an expert at propaganda.

"Hamas saw it as an excuse to start bombing Israel with a shit ton of missiles and trying to carry out suicide bombings(that were prevented thanks to the IDF) immediately after the Palestinian boy was murdered."

And the sad thing is that IDF's hard work in protecting its own people is often used against them. People posting graphs in the vein of "look how few people Hamas kills every day, Israel is such a monster for attacking them etc".
The only reason those fucking graphs aren't reversed is because the IDF does its job and protects it people! Opposite to Hamas who as the government in Gaza uses it's own people for human shields instead.
 

elhav

Member
Where is your proof that Hamas killed those boys? Hamas denies any involvement with those deaths. I have yet to read a report of results from an investigation into the deaths of these kids.
http://warsclerotic.wordpress.com/2014/06/27/israel-names-suspects-in-kidnapping-of-three-teens/

It was known that they are Hamas activists. Hamas essentially denied any involvement but welcomed the murder, instead of talking against it. They called it a "victory".

Truly the talk of those who desire peace. And I want people to know exactly what Hamas really is. They don't want peace, they admitted it. They want Israel, they won't spare the lives of innocent civilians etc.
 

yarden24

Member
That they recognize the state of Israel and won't keep trying to destroy it, and that the solution to the conflict would be achieved through negotiations. That would be helpful.

what does it matter if they "recognize" the state of Israel, if they agree to not try and destroy it and negotiate?
 

collige

Banned
And the sad thing is that IDF's hard work in protecting its own people is often used against them. People posting graphs in the vein of "look how few people Hamas kills every day, Israel is such a monster for attacking them etc".
The only reason those fucking graphs aren't reversed is because the IDF does its job and protects it people! Opposite to Hamas who as the government in Gaza uses it's own people for human shields instead.

Not really. Regardless of Israel's defenses, Hamas' rocket strikes are remarkably ineffective.
wMissiles.jpg

We're looking at like 20% accuracy before the Iron Dome even comes into play.
 

elhav

Member
Not really. Regardless of Israel's defenses, Hamas' rocket strikes are remarkably ineffective.
wMissiles.jpg

We're looking at like 20% accuracy before the Iron Dome even comes into play.
What you certainly don't hear about is the tunnels and suicide squads that Hamas are sending all the time, that Israel's army manages to stop.

If Israel wasn't able to stop them, it would be the same as in the second Intifada, where more than 800 civilians were murdered by Hamas operatives.
 

LNBL

Member
http://warsclerotic.wordpress.com/2014/06/27/israel-names-suspects-in-kidnapping-of-three-teens/

It was known that they are Hamas activists. Hamas essentially denied any involvement but welcomed the murder, instead of talking against it. They called it a "victory".

Truly the talk of those who desire peace. And I want people to know exactly what Hamas really is. They don't want peace, they admitted it. They want Israel, they won't spare the lives of innocent civilians etc.

Yeah, I don't see that as proof that they killed them.

And it was not Hamas that called it a victory, it was an unnamed source that called it a victory according to the Times of Israel. Not sure if I would accept the bombing and killing of innocent civilians on the basis of words of a unnamed source.

"And I want people to know exactly what Hamas really is. They don't want peace, they admitted it. They want Israel, they won't spare the lives of innocent civilians etc."

What you want is to feed the people only your side of the story and the news you are being fed by Israeli news channels. What you fail to recognize is that your view is so shortsighted in a way that you are blind to the blame that falls on Israel as well.
 

Enosh

Member
Hamas is offering Israel a truce right now.
Do the terms seem unreasonable to you?
you mean the open border, UN control of sea and releasing prisoners one?

very reasonable apart from the prisoners part, I would like to know why exactly they were arrested in the first place, if it is for something ala protesting release them if it is for like blowing up a bus hell no

but of course getting Israel to agree to those demands is a different thing, personally I don't see it happening
 

collige

Banned
What you certainly don't hear about is the tunnels and suicide squads that Hamas are sending all the time, that Israel's army manages to stop.

If Israel wasn't able to stop them, it would be the same as in the second Intifada, where more than 800 civilians were murdered by Hamas operatives.

Oh? And how many attempted suicide bombings have the been over the course of this conflict? Because literally no news website has any mention of them.
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
I think it's stupid of Israel to turn this into an aerial bombardment of a tiny region, when they have more than enough on-foot troops to enter, find targets, firing stations, rouge militia, etc. and engage the hostiles terrorists on foot, while leaving the civilians completely out of this. Chances are the military casualty count in that kind of engagement would be slim to none, as numbers would simply favor the IDF ten-fold, as would the advantages of high-end tech.

I think Israel has a right to defend itself, but the way it's doing it is very, very irresponsible.

And I'm speaking as a Jew with family in Israel.

Unfortunately, both sides of the table are represented by terrible people and terrible regimes.
 
http://warsclerotic.wordpress.com/2014/06/27/israel-names-suspects-in-kidnapping-of-three-teens/

It was known that they are Hamas activists. Hamas essentially denied any involvement but welcomed the murder, instead of talking against it. They called it a "victory".

Truly the talk of those who desire peace. And I want people to know exactly what Hamas really is. They don't want peace, they admitted it. They want Israel, they won't spare the lives of innocent civilians etc.
It's really counter-productive for Hamas to kill kidnapped Israeli teens (if they did the killing) in cold blood like that. It's more productive if they used the teens as bargaining chips in exchange for Hamas prisoners in Israel. More likely, they were rogue militants that tried to "avenge" the killing of two Palestinian teens killed by sniper fire a couple of weeks ago or just petty criminals.
 

Quotient

Member
you mean the open border, UN control of sea and releasing prisoners one?

very reasonable apart from the prisoners part, I would like to know why exactly they were arrested in the first place, if it is for something ala protesting release them if it is for like blowing up a bus hell no

but of course getting Israel to agree to those demands is a different thing, personally I don't see it happening

I don't think Israel would trust any UN force unless it was lead by the US with majority US troops*. It was a UN peace keeping force that allowed the Egyptians to amass an army for an invasion.

* my speculation.
 

RiZ III

Member
Woke up to see posts about the murder of those 4 children playing soccer by the IDF. So awful. Journalists were actually there to witness it. Clearly Hamas was using these kids as human shields.. o wait. I mean what the hell were these assholes even aiming at? It was an open field with 4 kids!

BsrFKZlCUAErnEK.jpg
 

Verano

Reads Ace as Lace. May God have mercy on their soul
I think it's stupid of Israel to turn this into an aerial bombardment of a tiny region, when they have more than enough on-foot troops to enter, find targets, firing stations, rouge militia, etc. and engage the hostiles terrorists on foot, while leaving the civilians completely out of this. Chances are the military casualty count in that kind of engagement would be slim to none, as numbers would simply favor the IDF ten-fold, as would the advantages of high-end tech.

I think Israel has a right to defend itself, but the way it's doing it is very, very irresponsible.

And I'm speaking as a Jew with family in Israel.

Unfortunately, both sides of the table are represented by terrible people and terrible regimes.

I would've never thought that you'd be Jewish alpha...since you got dat tag and dat avie lol....

Anyways my Jewish friends don't support the bombardment of Gaza. I've asked them to voice out their concerns but can't since they might get excommunicated from their synagogue if not be rejected from entering Israel. Is that even possible??? To be ostracized for going against the grain I mean.
 

GYODX

Member
I think it's stupid of Israel to turn this into an aerial bombardment of a tiny region, when they have more than enough on-foot troops to enter, find targets, firing stations, rouge militia, etc. and engage the hostiles terrorists on foot, while leaving the civilians completely out of this. Chances are the military casualty count in that kind of engagement would be slim to none, as numbers would simply favor the IDF ten-fold, as would the advantages of high-end tech.

I think Israel has a right to defend itself, but the way it's doing it is very, very irresponsible.

And I'm speaking as a Jew with family in Israel.

Unfortunately, both sides of the table are represented by terrible people and terrible regimes.
Ground operations always end in more casualties for both sides.
 
Woke up to see posts about the murder of those 4 children playing soccer by the IDF. So awful. Journalists were actually there to witness it. Clearly Hamas was using these kids as human shields.. o wait. I mean what the hell were these assholes even aiming at? It was an open field with 4 kids!

BsrFKZlCUAErnEK.jpg
Wow, they shelled it twice, and all the kids were from one family.
The first strike hit at around 1300 GMT, prompting children and adults on the beach to scatter, as others rushed out to see what happened.
A second struck as they ran, setting fire to huts on the beach as terrified children shouted that there were dead and injured.
The strikes appeared to be the result of shelling by the Israeli navy against an area with small shacks used by fishermen.
Several children ran inside the hotel where AFP journalists saw at least three with shrapnel injuries.
They were evacuated by ambulances, which also picked up more injured people from the beach, including a man who had part of his leg torn off.

The four bodies were later taken to Abu Hasira mosque, near where the boys had died.
The boys, all from the Bakr family, were laid out, wrapped in the yellow flags of the Fatah party of Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas, in front of mourners.
“We come from God and to God we shall return,” the imam overseeing the funeral prayers said.
 

Quotient

Member
I think it's stupid of Israel to turn this into an aerial bombardment of a tiny region, when they have more than enough on-foot troops to enter, find targets, firing stations, rouge militia, etc. and engage the hostiles terrorists on foot, while leaving the civilians completely out of this. Chances are the military casualty count in that kind of engagement would be slim to none, as numbers would simply favor the IDF ten-fold, as would the advantages of high-end tech.

I think Israel has a right to defend itself, but the way it's doing it is very, very irresponsible.

And I'm speaking as a Jew with family in Israel.

Unfortunately, both sides of the table are represented by terrible people and terrible regimes.

When you are going house to house in a dense populated urban territory any technology advantage you have begins to fade. There is no guarantee that civilian deaths would be lessened, it may even be the reverse.

There is a reason they prefer aerial bombardment over a ground invasion.
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
I would've never thought that you'd be Jewish alpha...since you got dat tag and dat avie lol....

Anyways my Jewish friends don't support the bombardment of Gaza. I've asked them to voice out their concerns but can't since they might get excommunicated from their synagogue if not be rejected from entering Israel. Is that even possible??? To be ostracized for going against the grain I mean.

Tag is a Dave Chappelle quote/skit.

Avatar is me trolling Kobe Bryant. Not sure why either of the two would give anyone an indication of what I am or not, ethnically.

Anyways, to answer your question, much like any group of people (Christian, denominations of Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc.) ostracizing is dependent on the extremity of their specific group. You can't generalize. As far as being rejected from going to Israel? That's the stupidest thing I've heard in a while.

Unless you're a convicted terrorist, saying something on Facebook won't get you rejected by customs in Israel.
 

elhav

Member
What you want is to feed the people only your side of the story and the news you are being fed by Israeli news channels. What you fail to recognize is that your view is so shortsighted in a way that you are blind to the blame that falls on Israel as well.
Really? Because so far it appears you haven't condemned Hamas even a single time in all your arguments. You ignored the quotes I gave you, of Hamas leaders, saying that they do not wish to have peace with Israel.

You changed the subject because you know Hamas are terrorists, you know they don't want peace, and yet you never mention it.

You keep going back to killing civilians, but we already had that discussion. I admitted the death of civilians is something terrible, but I explained that Israel is trying its best to avoid casualties. More than a few times IDF canceled a bombing of a building when they saw children or innocents crowded on the roof or in nearby areas.

You keep ignoring these facts, and yet you call me shortsighted? You won't believe sources some of us will give you, yet you believe sources that fit your opinion.
 

kmag

Member
Woke up to see posts about the murder of those 4 children playing soccer by the IDF. So awful. Journalists were actually there to witness it. Clearly Hamas was using these kids as human shields.. o wait. I mean what the hell were these assholes even aiming at? It was an open field with 4 kids!

BsrFKZlCUAErnEK.jpg

Foreign Journalists are staying in a hotel overlooking the beach and gave the children first aid. They're pretty equivocal about what happened.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/16/witness-gaza-shelling-first-hand-account

Basically for the Israeli apologists. Children targetted killed with first shot (no warning) then the survivors and aidgivers bracketed with additional fire.
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
Ground operations always end in more casualties for both sides.

Ground operations are highly targeted, focused and precise. They know who they're looking for and who to open fire on. They can also pin-point where rockets are being fired from. The IDF is highly capable. Casualties will be against anyone who is armed, not innocent children, wives, and others who are unarmed. IDF armor is also extremely thick, as is the rest of their combat gear and they roll in massive squads with eyes in the sky providing assistance. Tactical on-foot warfare is an easy game for the Israeli army. I know it sounds like something out of a videogame, but it's the Army's job to put their lives on the line to prevent the deaths of innocent civilians, be it they Jewish, Arab, Christian, Muslim, etc. (Israel is an extremely culturally diverse country, which many don't know).

When you are going house to house in a dense populated urban territory any technology advantage you have begins to fade. There is no guarantee that civilian deaths would be lessened, it may even be the reverse.

There is a reason they prefer aerial bombardment over a ground invasion.

Unless those civilians start getting in the way of operations by hurling glass, rocks, or maybe even carrying concealed ammunitions, there should be no innocent lives lost. I stress the word 'innocent' here. If you are interfering, then you are no longer innocent and are only adding more to the problem.
 

RK9039

Member
Woke up to see posts about the murder of those 4 children playing soccer by the IDF. So awful. Journalists were actually there to witness it. Clearly Hamas was using these kids as human shields.. o wait. I mean what the hell were these assholes even aiming at? It was an open field with 4 kids!

BsrFKZlCUAErnEK.jpg

Disgusting.
 

Quotient

Member
Ground operations are highly targeted, focused and precise. They know who they're looking for and who to open fire on. They can also pin-point where rockets are being fired from. The IDF is highly capable. Casualties will be against anyone who is armed, not innocent children, wives, and others who are unarmed.

The air strikes are suppose to be highly targeted, focused and precise, yet we are seeing a large number of civilian deaths.

Unless those civilians start getting in the way of operations by hurling glass, rocks, or maybe even carrying concealed ammunitions, there should be no innocent lives lost. I stress the word 'innocent' here. If you are interfering, then you are no longer innocent and are only adding more to the problem.

There have been many situations where families have been trapped between the IDF and Hamas/Hezbollah/etc fighters.
 
I would like to know what threat those 4 children posed while playing football ?

In other news



http://stream.aljazeera.com/story/201407161104-0023931
Israel buys tweets to promote Gaza escalation
PM Netanyahu steps up PR efforts on social media


Using public relations efforts to build public support for military action is not a new idea. But spending money on tweets to shape global perceptions may be the next frontier for such efforts. Hayes Brown, Editor at Foreign Policy, posted this screenshot of a promoted tweet from the official Twitter account of the Prime Minister of Israel, seeking to build support for an escalation of Israeli military operations in Gaza.
 

elhav

Member
It's really counter-productive for Hamas to kill kidnapped Israeli teens (if they did the killing) in cold blood like that. It's more productive if they used the teens as bargaining chips in exchange for Hamas prisoners in Israel. More likely, they were rogue militants that tried to "avenge" the killing of two Palestinian teens killed by sniper fire a couple of weeks ago or just petty criminals.
Using civilians is not a smart tactic for negotiations. Especially when compared with Hamas peisoners who aided in terrorist acts.
It would only give them a good scolding from the world.

Several sources indicate these killers are Hamas activists, or related to the Hamas in several ways.
 

AlphaSnake

...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
The air strikes are suppose to be highly targeted, focused and precise, yet we are seeing a large number of civilian deaths.



There have been many situations where families have been trapped between the IDF and Hamas/Hezbollah/etc firefights.

Anyone who believes airstrikes are that precise are fools. That's why I personally condemn them. Gaza is way too small and the effects of a rocket resonate simply too much throughout such a small region.

On-foot manpower is more precise. They go exactly where they have to. Fire on exactly whom they have to. Dismantle what they find firing on them. It's really that simple.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom