securitypigeon
Banned
Here's my review if you need any more convincing:
http://www.dpadmagazine.com/2013/05/28/call-of-juarez-gunslinger/
http://www.dpadmagazine.com/2013/05/28/call-of-juarez-gunslinger/
Does anything happen if you win a duel dishonorably? I got jumpy on the dual duel lol.
The only thing that happens is that you'll miss out on additional bonus XP at the end of the chapter. I wouldn't sweat it too much.
I felt like a scumbag by wild west standardsThe only thing that happens is that you'll miss out on additional bonus XP at the end of the chapter. I wouldn't sweat it too much.
"More riveting than the Sydney Harbour Bridge" :lol
Gunslinger's refreshing take on storytelling solves a lot of modern game narrative problems and deserves to find its way into other titles.
"More riveting than the Sydney Harbour Bridge" :lol
I'm sorry, I'm just watching your review now
PS. Holy shit, that IS reminiscent of Des Mangan.
This game with motion plus on wii u will be perfect I hope ubisoft release it
"More riveting than the Sydney Harbour Bridge" :lol
I'm sorry, I'm just watching your review now
PS. Holy shit, that IS reminiscent of Des Mangan.
I can't unhear myself as a younger pitched, more slurred Des Mangan waffling on about video games.
goddamnit
Apparently you people are determined to make me Google Des Mangan.
I'm assuming you also get stamped as DISHONORABLE on the end of level score screen. It mentions it a couple of times, it's basically just an easy mode duel win for less points if you don't want to let yourself get shot after drawing early to retry it.I felt like a scumbag by wild west standards
There's no level cap in terms of unlocking skills. I think there is even an achievement for unlocking all skills, which in my case might happen early on a third playthrough.TBH I didn't care for the game at first, but halfway through, it just clicked and I really enjoyed it. Currently replaying it on NG+. Anyone know the level cap in this game?
I haven't tried it yet on my first two playthroughs and I don't think there's an achievement for it so I guess I never even got around to it, ha.
Imagine watching this as a 13/14/18-year-old, without high-speed internet to download stuff. Great window into some outrageous shit, but with a suitably emotive delivery and dry, sometimes silly witticisms.Apparently you people are determined to make me Google Des Mangan.
I meant there's no achievement for winning a duel dishonorably, so I didn't even try it. Sometimes I would even restart a duel if I missed the first shot, since I feel like an amateur cowboy if I use more than one shot on a duel.There is actually butit's for the final duel with Bob. If you kill him honorably youll get a trophy/cheev
I'm assuming the PC version supports the 360 controller?
I Google'd it pages ago.Apparently you people are determined to make me Google Des Mangan.
Imagine watching this as a 13/14/18-year-old, without high-speed internet to download stuff. Great window into some outrageous shit, but with a suitably emotive delivery and dry, sometimes silly witticisms.
Much like EatChildren
Yup, works perfectly too. Fully controller supported.
This level design is great. The length of the levels is pretty much perfect too.
This game is fantastic.
Brilliant level design and as Stallion Free says above - nothing feels too long or short, it's quick and snappy and never outstays its welcome.
I need to replay after I finish though because I keep missing lots of secrets. Might write up a review/video review in a short while too.
I definitely brought this up slightly off-topic in a thread that wasn't generating much conversation, probably far more relevant here.
13 hours on Steam and still firing up the Arcade mode once in a while to run through a few levels real quickly, Gunslinger puts most AAA games to shame. It's so incredible for the price.
It is a substantially better game than Blood Dragon, in my opinion, but the Metacritic averages are puzzling.
Reviewers are fucking high, this is a 9/10 game. Or maybe they should be high, they would enjoy it more. Some people seemed to appreciate it properly, though, like Justin McElroy and Jim Sterling.
As good as Blood Dragon is, I think the higher Metacritic score than Gunslinger is purely due to hype and Ubisoft marketing. Not the actual quality of the games.
I've made my opinion clear, I absolutely want more of this style of game. It's good for us, it's good for the publishers, it's good for the developers. This new era of $15 standalone expansion DLC is the answer to the rising, bloated costs of AAA development.
Because it's my opinion that Blood Dragon got more attention and better review scores because of Ubisoft's marketing, not on the overall quality of the games.
They basically forced one of the best games of the year into a word of mouth situation and that always pisses me off. I think most people were aware that Blood Dragon was a $15 stand-alone game from Far Cry 3, but there seemed to be a lot of confusion about what Gunslinger was at release, and still even a bit after that. Many people thought it was a full-priced game, or another shitty sequel after The Cartel, or whatever, Ubisoft just didn't get the message out there and I feel that they should have. It deserves it.
Perfect example of the disconnect between fans and game reviewers. I have seen nothing but shining positivity in online discussions about Gunslinger.
This review in particular exemplifies the problem with $15 downloadable titles, some people EXPECT a $60 experience out of every single video game they play and PR suffers for it.
IncGamers - 50 - The broad stylistic flourishes do a fair job of masking the underwhelming reality of much of the gameplay, but once Greaves’ tall tale is told you’re left with a pretty linear, whack-a-cowboy shooter in a no-horse town.
^ What a bunch a bullshit. It's a $15 arcade game, not Red Dead Redemption 2.
I do wonder how much of that marketing was intentional and unintentional because of the leak.Gunslinger to me is the better game than Blood Dragon. Blood Dragon just got super marketing and Michael Biehn.
Just finished it. Excellent.
Great ending.REVENGE!
I know, right?Oh... holy shit it is.
I do wonder how much of that marketing was intentional and unintentional because of the leak.
I think the game being leaked before it was even announced probably gave it a bit more time for people to be hyped about it, whereas Gunslinger was like "Oh, this comes out next week... what is it?".
To me, I think this word of mouth approach has worked splendidly. I don't think Ubisoft trying to aggressively market this would've done them much good, seeing as how CoJ: The Cartel made the Juarez franchise anathema to gaming so those efforts would've amounted, in our eyes, to them screaming, "HEY GAIZ, NEW CALL OF JUAREZ GAME, YOU LOVE THAT SHIT RIGHT?"
Besides, they actually have been promoting it with pre-release trailers and showing it to journalists; Gaming Media simply ignored it until word of mouth got out that it was good. Pre-release coverage was mostly indifferent to outright dismissive. The latter in particular cracks me up because the author dismisses Gunslinger for having the gall to be a tight, fun FPS instead of Red Dead Redemption.
Blood Dragon was an excellent idea in the wrong game, in my opinion. The style, presentation, and concept was fucking brilliant and totally on-point, and the team deserves big props for that. But it was also squeezed into the Far Cry 3 formula, which to me was totally out of place. Plus I'm not really fond of the Far Cry 3 design philosophy. So as good as Blood Dragon was, I felt I was playing Far Cry 3 with a more impressive skin, instead of the 80s Terminator/Commando simulator it wanted to (and in presentation/style was) be.
Gunslinger, on the other hand, is a far more realised and tightly designed game. It's not just stylish and well presented, it plays like what you imagine an over-the-top Western shoot out should be. I like it for the same reason I like rail shooters and arcade games - fast, brutal, combat driven, where every mechanic is centred around the act of shooting, and the encounters come at you fast as hell.
I'm yet to play it, but I have a feeling this one's going to be a slow burner. It's the opposite of Blood Dragon in that sense... let people discover it for themselves rather than just have marketing shove it down your throat. Lower expectations that way... less hyperbole.Yes, absolutely fair points. Despite the poor reputation after TC, I do still think they could have pushed this one a bit more aggressively, especially if they knew fairly early on that this one would be substantially better in quality (although obviously I have no true idea how far along the game became "good" and when the marketing plans were put into place).
Some games press is certainly as out of touch with gamers as anything, as usual. I specifically made a comment above about IncGamers comparing it to expectations for Red Dead Redemption 2 in that gigantic nested quote.
True, if any game ever was deserved of hyperbole, though, it was Blood Dragon. Fits the extreme and unserious tone and all.I'm yet to play it, but I have a feeling this one's going to be a slow burner. It's the opposite of Blood Dragon in that sense... let people discover it for themselves rather than just have marketing shove it down your throat. Lower expectations that way... less hyperbole.
Didn't it turn out to be crap, though?True, if any game ever was deserved of hyperbole, though, it was Blood Dragon. Fits the extreme and unserious tone and all.
Didn't it turn out to be crap, though?
Alternatively, I don't think there was any hype leading up to Hotline Miami.
Yes, absolutely fair points. Despite the poor reputation after TC, I do still think they could have pushed this one a bit more aggressively, especially if they knew fairly early on that this one would be substantially better in quality (although obviously I have no true idea how far along the game became "good" and when the marketing plans were put into place).
Blood Dragon was an excellent idea in the wrong game, in my opinion. The style, presentation, and concept was fucking brilliant and totally on-point, and the team deserves big props for that. But it was also squeezed into the Far Cry 3 formula, which to me was totally out of place. Plus I'm not really fond of the Far Cry 3 design philosophy. So as good as Blood Dragon was, I felt I was playing Far Cry 3 with a more impressive skin, instead of the 80s Terminator/Commando simulator it wanted to (and in presentation/style was) be.
Gunslinger, on the other hand, is a far more realised and tightly designed game. It's not just stylish and well presented, it plays like what you imagine an over-the-top Western shoot out should be. I like it for the same reason I like rail shooters and arcade games - fast, brutal, combat driven, where every mechanic is centred around the act of shooting, and the encounters come at you fast as hell.
Blood Dragon was an excellent idea in the wrong game, in my opinion. The style, presentation, and concept was fucking brilliant and totally on-point, and the team deserves big props for that. But it was also squeezed into the Far Cry 3 formula, which to me was totally out of place. Plus I'm not really fond of the Far Cry 3 design philosophy. So as good as Blood Dragon was, I felt I was playing Far Cry 3 with a more impressive skin, instead of the 80s Terminator/Commando simulator it wanted to (and in presentation/style was) be.
Gunslinger, on the other hand, is a far more realised and tightly designed game. It's not just stylish and well presented, it plays like what you imagine an over-the-top Western shoot out should be. I like it for the same reason I like rail shooters and arcade games - fast, brutal, combat driven, where every mechanic is centred around the act of shooting, and the encounters come at you fast as hell.
Oh yeah, I'm sure I've heard a similar discussion about that type of video game self-awareness (for lack of a better term) on Idle Thumbs or something. Basically where a game that becomes too self aware is annoying, but if it's able to take typical game tropes in it's stride and integrate them seamlessly, it's doing a good job.Very well said. I mention a few pages ago how this game reminded me why I love old SEGA arcade games. It doesn't play like a SEGA one, but it reminded me of that good era. The Narrative and the story was just a bonus.
Anyone else have a solid 60fps that at times feels sluggish, like the game drops to 30? When this happens the FPS counter still reads 60 and no oddities are experienced other than sluggishness.
They fixed this in the first patch, at least 100% for me.Is stutter that you're getting. Is caused by using the mouse and keyboard. I went with the pad instead. Strange for me, but it does the job. On a side note. I got the 3 star achievement!
There was a Steam patch to fix stutter for some people in case that was related.Anyone else have a solid 60fps that at times feels sluggish, like the game drops to 30? When this happens the FPS counter still reads 60 and no oddities are experienced other than sluggishness.