You put a nice interpretation on those words, but at the face value he's saying the game would be impossible without SSD. Nowhere did he claim that the game could also be possible on old hardware at slower speeds to give credit to his words about blazing fast speeds. I can give you credit for trying to put context to his words, but the reality is he never put context to them and neither did Insomniac for months leading up to release even though they knew very well all the arguments about the topic that were taking place on social media.
So really people took those words at face value and the fact that Insomniac never claimed otherwise amidst the controversy just shows they were ok with this lie. Not surprising because Sony was lying and trucking people a lot leading up to the launch of PS5.
And yet he said you can't run the game on old hardware(HDD) period and never said you could but it would load slower, lol. I think it's you who added interpretation to fit your narrative.No, I actually read the entire quote you provided instead of selecting a portion of the quote to bolster a flawed narrative.
And yet he said you can't run the game on old hardware(HDD) period...
Max settings is vague. What are your PC specs so I can judge?Well I’m running ESO, Uncharted, Miles Morales, Gotham Knights, and FF7R at max settings so I think you assume wrong.
Your must have been missing in 2020 cause this was all over internet, but here it is:
"Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is a game that utilises dimensions and dimensional rifts, and that would not have been possible without the solid state drive of the PlayStation 5," explains Smith.
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart's Dimensional Rifts Only Possible With PS5's SSD | PlayStationTrophies.org
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart's gameplay reveal was stunning, wasn't it? Especially impressive was seeing the dynamic duo j...www.playstationtrophies.org
They also doubled down on that rhetoric on social media and other quotes prior to release.
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is a game that utilises dimensions and dimensional rifts, and that would not have been possible without the solid state drive of the PlayStation 5," explains Smith. "The SSD is screamingly fast, it allows us to build worlds and project players from one place to another at near-instantaneous speeds.
It's in the same article, lol. He said the game mechanics can only run on SSD, which is indirectly saying it wouldn't run on HDDs.Link?
I imagine that the number of PCMR neverconsole weirdos is actually quite small, and most people who want to play Ratchet have bought it on the PS5. I know that I'm not going to double dip on something like that when I can just hit the button on the remote and be playing it there.Didn't even crack the top 100 ccu on steam on launch day, peaked around ~8700. Not sure if it's the good will burn't on tlou1 or just not something pc players care to drop full price on. For comparison Remnant 2 cracked the top 10 with 83k ccu today even with the outcry about it's performance.
Your must have been missing in 2020 cause this was all over internet, but here it is:
"Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart is a game that utilises dimensions and dimensional rifts, and that would not have been possible without the solid state drive of the PlayStation 5," explains Smith.
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart's Dimensional Rifts Only Possible With PS5's SSD | PlayStationTrophies.org
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart's gameplay reveal was stunning, wasn't it? Especially impressive was seeing the dynamic duo j...www.playstationtrophies.org
They also doubled down on that rhetoric on social media and other quotes prior to release.
It's in the same article, lol. He said the game mechanics can only run on SSD, which is indirectly saying it wouldn't run on HDDs.
Why not watch the video where the quote is taken from and watch where he says what they wanted to create would not have been done on previous gen (basically naming PS4). People are taking the quote of the article and making their own spin when in reality watching the video is where you get the whole context of him talking about the PS4 and PS5 and not anything else.
Alright, so this game is fascinating in terms of what it does. Some really strong texture streaming that stresses the 4090 even. Although I'd wager, the slowdowns aren't caused by the card itself but another part of the PC I/O pipeline which isn't all that efficient and hasn't changed since forever. I think Alex from DF also theorized back then that moving to PCIE Gen 5 wouldn't make a difference.
I'm also assuming texture quality on PS5 is always set to the highest no matter what. I really wish more developers pushed entire systems like R&C does. I don't wanna get ahead of myself, but it looks like a technological marvel.
Depends what the expectations were. It's a 2-year old mascot platformer/shooter. Not much of an audience for these games anymore.This game flopping seems more important than running it off a zip drive IMO. It’s not even in the top 100 most played games on launch day.
Steam Charts · Most Played Games on Steam
High-resolution charts with concurrent player counts for all Steam games, including historic data and stats. View most played games on Steam. View Steam player counts.steamdb.info
At least part of it but this entirely depends where the bottleneck lies. In the GPU decompression test of DirectStorage 1.3, some drives blow past 30GB/s but in the game, people report R/W speeds no higher than 1.2GB/s. Also, this is me just speculating based on the data I have. I could be completely off the mark.You're saying the bottleneck is in the I/O pipeline on the software side, but wasn't DirectStorage meant to address that exact problem?
This game flopping seems more important than running it off a zip drive IMO. It’s not even in the top 100 most played games on launch day.
Steam Charts · Most Played Games on Steam
High-resolution charts with concurrent player counts for all Steam games, including historic data and stats. View most played games on Steam. View Steam player counts.steamdb.info
Very interesting Gen 2 vs Gen 3 PCIE performance in comparison to MM
CSGO just marching on... incredible
Hopefully Sony gets the memo.This game flopping seems more important than running it off a zip drive IMO. It’s not even in the top 100 most played games on launch day.
Steam Charts · Most Played Games on Steam
High-resolution charts with concurrent player counts for all Steam games, including historic data and stats. View most played games on Steam. View Steam player counts.steamdb.info
As in everything as high as it can go. I only turn off raytracing. It seems you’re already judging plenty.Max settings is vague. What are your PC specs so I can judge?
To illustrate his point that there's a massive difference between a 3070 running on PCIE4 vs 3( there isn't) he's illustrating the difference between a GPU on PCIE2(which is PCIE3 x8) vs PCIE3(x16).
He makes no sense.
Hopefully Sony gets the memo.
But he said there's a huge difference in PCIE4 with a 3070 vs PCIE3 which is not the case and how can he say that if he doesn't have a Gen4 mobo?No, he's comparing the performance profile of PCIE boards and using MM game and 3070 as the independent dependent variables. He's trying to extrapolate to get to an educated guess for impact on Ratchet since he doesn't have Gen4 board
Yeah that it’s number 6 on the most popular game bought at the moment….you are saltyHopefully Sony gets the memo.
But he said there's a huge difference in PCIE4 with a 3070 vs PCIE3 which is not the case and how can he say that if he doesn't have a Gen4 mobo?
I'm pretty sure the guy is just wrong and running out VRAM from having RT enabled. The smoking bullet is that he's using Medium settings which barely streams any data from disk.No, he didn't. He said they will LIKELY see a difference because he noticed the saturation difference between Gen2 and Gen3 for the same game. He then compared the limited difference of MM between Gen2 and Gen 3.
I'm pretty sure the guy is just wrong and running out VRAM from having RT enabled. The smoking bullet is that he's using Medium settings which barely streams any data from disk.
I already ran some tests comparing disk reads during the intro sequence and here's how they stack up.
PS5: ~16GB
PC Very High: ~19GB
PC High: ~5GB
PC Medium: ~1.8GB
I'm running the game on Very High settings without RT and it barely makes a blip on the bus load. He's running on Medium settings with RT and it's completely thrashing his bus. Both of us are on PCIe 3.0 so it's clearly not because of DirectStorage when my game is pushing 10x more disk data through.
Its why i dont think they will patch or fix this.This game flopping seems more important than running it off a zip drive IMO. It’s not even in the top 100 most played games on launch day.
Steam Charts · Most Played Games on Steam
High-resolution charts with concurrent player counts for all Steam games, including historic data and stats. View most played games on Steam. View Steam player counts.steamdb.info
Look good but played like a slideshow compared to my pc
I had zero loading and everything was/has been seamless. I would say identical to PS5.Look good but played like a slideshow compared to my pc
That... it is cost effective to port their successful games to PC for more profit?Hopefully Sony gets the memo.
The ends aren't justifying the means.I had zero loading and everything was/has been seamless. I would say identical to PS5.
That... it is cost effective to port their successful games to PC for more profit?
That's not good for a new title.Yeah that it’s number 6 on the most popular game bought at the moment….you are salty
Limited hand me downs that trickle down at a snails pace.I know you’re very upset about PC ports but more are coming obviously
Look at his power usage. The 3070 is a 220w card but it's only using 120-150w in his screenshots. That strongly suggests that it's underutilized.But his GPU remains at full utilization.
Look at his power usage. The 3070 is a 220w card but it's only using 120-150w in his screenshots. That strongly suggests that it's underutilized.
'GPU utilization' is just a measure of work scheduled by Windows and doesn't really say anything about how busy the physical chip is. Encoding a video with NVENC will show the GPU being fully utilized, for example, but it only uses a tiny part of the chip. For all we know, it's just Windows issuing copy commands because he's running out of VRAM.
Hard to say obviously. But I really doubt it's anything else since my own PCIe load is nothing remotely like his in this game.
Anyone tried the Steam Deck version yet?
OK I FINALLY GOT AN ANSWER AND CONFIRMATION FOR DECK SSD PERF
This video shows off the rift areas with the internal Deck SSD (NOT AN SD CARD) and the loading is.... fine. Not as slow as a HDD/SD but not as fast as a PS5 either. Acceptable!
I don't find it very surprising, it's a very short game, sold at full price, 2 years after its console release. It will sell better during sales but right now it's too much for what it is I think.This game flopping seems more important than running it off a zip drive IMO. It’s not even in the top 100 most played games on launch day.
Steam Charts · Most Played Games on Steam
High-resolution charts with concurrent player counts for all Steam games, including historic data and stats. View most played games on Steam. View Steam player counts.steamdb.info
How about 17 year old TF2 with more players than GTA, CoD, Destiny, and Apex? Defies logic
The ends aren't justifying the means.