Not according to the vote that just took place.
Silence is consent in democracy.
That's nonsense. The referendum wasn't legitimate. Anyone not in favor of leaving had no reason to go and vote. By not voting most people showed that they did not agree.
If it was a peaceful vote, yeah, not showing up would mean they don't agree, but with the police attacking people unprovoked, that's not as simple as that, who knows how many may have not showed up due to fear.By not voting most people showed that they did not agree.
Can't put violence aside though.What makes it that different from 2014 vote? (violence aside)
Roughly the same voter turnout, and similar results.
That's nonsense. The referendum wasn't legitimate. Anyone not in favor of leaving had no reason to go and vote. By not voting most people showed that they did not agree.
What makes it that different from 2014 vote? (violence aside)
Roughly the same voter turnout, and similar results.
The referendum wasn't legitimate. Anyone in favor of leaving had no reason to go and vote. By not voting most people showed that they did agree.
That makes no sense. Anyone not believing in the legality of the referendum had reason not to vote, because voting meant that you considered it to be legitimate and lend credence to it.
By not participating, most people voted against the referendum itself.
That makes no sense. Anyone not believing in the legality of the referendum had reason not to vote, because voting meant that you considered it to be legitimate and lend credence to it.
By not participating, most people voted against the referendum itself.
Really? With the cops beating the shit outta ppl trying to vote does it really makes no sense to u?
The hundred of thousands of bailouts that were lost due to police activities could have easily made this a majority.
What makes it that different from 2014 vote? (violence aside)
Roughly the same voter turnout, and similar results.
What's different is that this shows what a chickenshit Rajoy is and how piss poor the handling of this on the part of the Spanish government was.
Most of the catalan people would be more than happy to have a federal state or a spanish republic recognizing the catalan nation with some fiscal advantages and such. Only the most fervent independentists go for the nationalistic romantic angle, this "revolution" is actually very pragmatic in its demands in general (we can argue if those demands are reasonable or not, that's another thing).
To give some context, only 40 years there was a dictatorship. A dictatorship where catalan indentity was completely forbidden and where minorities where prosecuted and executed. When "democracy" came, it came in the shape of a Bourbon king (I have to say I really hate this dinasty) and a transition which was... tame, as all the powerful spanish (and catalan!) families were exactly the same before and after: Telefonica, Repsol, Endesa, various construction companies... the oligarchy was essentially the same as with the dictator so in all reality the "powers" of the State were the same. Add to the mix that all the fascists just changed the name of the political party and continued on with their lifes without being prosecuted. Yes, ALL of the government people with Franco were safe in the new Monarchy, it sounds nuts but it's what happened.
So we have a very young democracy with fascist roots that never went away (PP is full to the brim with fascits families that never asked for forgiveness or atoned for their crimes) and currently we are ruled by people that just don't get what Spain is. Catalan people want essentially change, escape from the spanish oligarchy and seeing the last elections and the political climate change is impossible in the short-medium. Now, Independence is not a magical solution to everything and it's very possible that we go from one oligarchy to a worse one.
There is not an easy solution to this mess. All sides fucked up.
With Spain declaring the vote illegitimate, and cops sent by the Spanish government to crack down on the referendum, the ONLY people who had a strong reason to go out and vote would be those who wanted to protest these actions strongly and show their support for secession.
Not according to the vote that just took place.
Silence is consent in democracy.
The only abusive attitude has been the beatings of innocent people.Nope. This stance is an abusive attitude. Silence is not consent. That's not how referendums work.
As you said, there's no easy solution. Specially now and it's not a problem only regarding Catalonia, it's a problem for the whole of Spain because if somehow a political solution is found through fiscal advantages or something like that, the central government would instantly have a problem with the rest of the country asking (and in my opinion rightfully so) for those same fiscal advantages.
It's a travesty what we already have with the Basque Country and Navarra regarding fiscalization and it generates a lot of political debate at least in the Andalusian parliament (You can hear things like "if everyone had that the state would be unsustainable" or "we cannot industrialize several areas because we cannot offer companies the same terms that the Basque Country or Madrid do").
Not easy, not easy at all.
The other abusive attitude has been the beatings of innocent people.
"both sides!!!1!!1!"There, I fixed it.
What about the elderly whom feel it's not safe or people who want to vote yet feel it's too dangerous to risk it? People who went out to vote are the ones that feel strongly for that subject matter however to state people whom did not manage to out to vote are the ones who did not want to split from Spain is not true.
"both sides!!!1!!1!"
I'm not sure how the Spanish state is organised but wouldn't federalising the country be an option? Like Germany or the US.
That way it's the same rules for every region.
(disregard if that's already how it is in Spain)
40% is not a high turnout.
Latest state elections saw a 77% turnout.
Really? With the cops beating the shit outta ppl trying to vote does it really makes no sense to u?
Yes.
If you agree the referendum is not valid, there is 0 incentive to go out and vote, considering the threat of violence.
The only reason to still go, in this case, is a strong conviction that the "yes" result has to win and be acknowledged.
Thus, not voting is no agreement in this case.
Why are you surprised that the majority of people who would go out and brave a potential riot to vote in an illegitimate ballot, are the ones who are voting for that cause which resulted in said ballot in the first place? This isn't a referendum that will be recognized by Spain, so almost everyone who would vote for the status quo in a proper ballot would just have stayed home I think.
The referendum might not have been valid, but that doesn't mean people don't want to vote.
If no one goes out to vote, it will be considered as a failure, while if people go out, at least everyone will see they care and it will pressure those against the referendum.
But it's not.You are right but there were 2 million plus votes counted with 700 thousand invalid. This despite the police.
Given that there are 7 million or something people there its a significant result still.
I think we can state with high certainty that the people who did go out and vote were the ones who wanted secession. This makes the 90% result out of the 40-45% turn out very unsurprising. But no one can really say with any sort of certainty what a larger turn out would have voted for. By declaring the referendum illegitimate and then cracking down on voters, the Spanish government did succeed in making the voting process effectively pointless. It's an incredibly bad look though.
By nature I am a unionist - I'm skeptical of the ability of smaller states to do as well individually as they might do in union - but I recognise, as should we all, the right of peoples to self-determine. If the Spanish state will not allow for a legitimate (in the legal sense) referendum to be held, then this was the best possible consultation of the people the Catalan region could have reasonably organised, and is therefore a legitimate (in the moral sense) referendum until a more satisfactory alternative is available. If I were the Catalan executive now, I would deliver an ultimatum to the Spanish state demanding a free and fair referendum, with refusal resulting in a unilateral declaration of independence. If the Spanish state wishes this to be illegitimate, they must provide a better alternative. That is the state of affairs we are now in.
Agreed. And did the No side even get an equal chance to campaign? I imagine the answer is no.Nope. This stance is an abusive attitude. Silence is not consent. That's not how referendums work.
This is very true. I don't understand why they are doing this now with the corrupt and fascist PP government in power. They should wait for the socialist to take over again or something better when peaceful negotiation is more likely.
I'd also like to mention I am ashamed and disgusted of the reactions of the European Union and its member states yesterday. A complete lack of integrity from Macron, Merkel, Juncker and all other leaders who have stayed eerily quiet. We're always quick to condemn non-EU members for violent behaviour but when our own member states are dismissing human rights? That's just an internal Spanish affair apparently.
Read away, in many aspects we have a highly federalized system save for the tax regime, but there's also the aspect of whether people want that federalization or not.I'm not sure how the Spanish state is organised but wouldn't federalising the country be an option? Like Germany or the US.
That way it's the same rules for every region.
(disregard if that's already how it is in Spain)
We don't even know if all the votes are valid. Or how many of these are protest votes because Madrid didn't recognize the referendum. Or yes, if those others would have been against.For this referendum to be overturned wouldn't it take something like 92 percent of the non-voters to vote against being independent? That sounds downright impossible.
Agreed. And did the No side even get an equal chance to campaign? I imagine the answer is no.
Wont happen because if Catalonias got validated it would give grounds to the Basque Country to also pursue theirs. It would be the end of Spain.There should be a legal referendum and problems would be solved.
As someone with very limited understanding of the situation, why did Spain order the police to go and prevent people from voting? Couldn't they just sit home and when the results came in, go "Nope, doesn't matter"? Seems unneccessary to fuck people up.
I agree with Crab here, a proper referendum must happen at some point. And now the only decent outcome would be either to negotiate how to make that happen,
That is kind of what the last 2 regional elections were about and yet here we are.or to find away to get the legitimacy, for example by having regional elections that will have as the main topic a new referendum.
While some source claims that if he doesn't get support (from other parties) for what they call the Catalan crisis he'll call elections. I honestly don't see him going away.Bonus: Rajoy should really be kicked out of the government.
Yeah they could. That's the fucked up part of all this mess.As someone with very limited understanding of the situation, why did Spain order the police to go and prevent people from voting? Couldn't they just sit home and when the results came in, go "Nope, doesn't matter"? Seems unneccessary to fuck people up.
That is kind of what the last 2 regional elections were about and yet here we are.