Darryl M R
Member
Fake news
Chris Paul is always going to be higher than Iverson and Nash on these kinds of lists because he has already had a better career than either of them.
Chris Paul is always going to be higher than Iverson and Nash on these kinds of lists because he has already had a better career than either of them.
Curry is a one trick pony. Sorry it's true.
Allen Iverson has done more with less than Chris Paul ever had.
what trick is that?
please, Paul wishes he was Nash. Nash's Suns probably could've won a championship if my Spurs didn't exist.
I grew up a huge Iverson fan, but the only reason that Sixers team made the finals was because the post-Jordan Eastern Conference was a dumpster fire.
Right?please, Paul wishes he was Nash. Nash's Suns probably could've won a championship if my Spurs didn't exist.
The talent gap between those teams negates that point. The Clippers would sweep that Iverson team. Maybe 4-1
That's why his assist numbers are always high along with a good usage rate huh.Curry is a one trick pony. Sorry it's true.
what trick is that?
That's why his assist numbers are always high along with a good usage rate huh.
1.Oscar's not better than the guys ranked above him. The triple double thing inflates his reputation .
Throwing up 3 balls. He's really good at it but as far as PG's go he would not be ahead of any of these guys:
Magic
Stockton
Kidd
Payton
Zeke
Oscar
Nash
West
I could see that as far as all around PGs go.Throwing up 3 balls. He's really good at it but as far as PG's go he would not be ahead of any of these guys:
Magic
Stockton
Kidd
Payton
Zeke
Oscar
Nash
West
Throwing up 3 balls. He's really good at it but as far as PG's go he would not be ahead of any of these guys:
Magic
Stockton
Kidd
Payton
Zeke
Oscar
Nash
West
He only averaged over 8 assists one time in his career.
I could see that as far as all around PGs go.
Throwing up 3 balls is underselling Curry though. He's been the best shooter that's ever lived these last couple seasons.
Dwight Howard was never and currently isn't the best big man in the league. GTFO with this shit.
If you judge him solely on a point guard scale, then yeah I guess. But you judge him by his value as a player and it's not even a contest. He's one of the two or three best shooters ever, and he might even be the best. That type of player, no matter what else they do, ranks highly all-time.
Should I judge him based on before Steve Kerr took over or after? I MO he is the best shooter ever, but that alone doesn't do it for me. He gets exposed on Defense all the time. He's passing isn't great at all and his shoes are ugly.
1.
SUMMARY
Career
G 1040
PTS 25.7
TRB 7.5
AST 9.5
2.
SUMMARY
Career
G 1039
PTS 27.1
TRB 7.2
AST 7.0
1. Oscar
2. LeBron
Again, I'm not saying he's the best ever. But if we look at the "best of all time" as a simple measure of value and who has the most skill overall, a guy who can shoot better than literally anyone is getting high marks from me.
Now adjust for pace
I'm just here to read ridiculous Lebron underratings. Those are fun.
Waiting for someone to try and claim LeBron isn't top 5 after what we saw in the finals last year
Of course they would. And Chris Paul being better than Iverson is a large part of that talent gap.
He will be when he retires, if he's not already.