Why is it so hard to respond to posts on mobile? Its pretty easy.
God damn there are some fucking stupid posts in this thread.
Indeed, I'm on mobile all day at work.
Why is it so hard to respond to posts on mobile? Its pretty easy.
God damn there are some fucking stupid posts in this thread.
You guys are in full mob mentality right now.
I'm on mobile so I'm not going to respond to 30 posts.
But to keep it short, he closed his door when the cop started to open it, and started the car. Obviously the car was put in drive. He had no intention of complying with the officer.
Did he deserve to die? No.
Could the situation have been avoided? Yes
And yes, I've watched the video. I am not in a location with a computer, so I apologize for not reading through 50 pages on my iPhone
It's a convenient excuse to post without engaging in discussion. We'll get another post reminding us that he's on mobile and never see him again.
Ah, so because I have a different viewpoint I'm an idiot, got it.
Call it what you want. It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license. For all the cop knew, he could have a warrant or be suspended. The officer likely would have ran his name and it would have been over.
The guy got a murder charge. I get it. I agree with it. I'm just saying that it was avoidable.
You guys are in full mob mentality right now.
Doesn't the US jury just say "guilty/not guilty" and then the judge sets the penalty?
READ. It wasn't his damn job. Why do you keep ignoring the post saying how far he was from campus? From police officers, no less?It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license.
Amazing..you know what? Shut up, until you read everything. You're getting mad that you're pissing in the wind, and the people you hit are calling you out on it. "I can't read everything, but.." is straight fucking ridiculous.You guys are in full mob mentality right now.
It's never you that's wrong.
Ah, so because I have a different viewpoint I'm an idiot, got it.
Call it what you want. It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license. For all the cop knew, he could have a warrant or be suspended. The officer likely would have ran his name and it would have been over.
The guy got a murder charge. I get it. I agree with it. I'm just saying that it was avoidable.
You guys are in full mob mentality right now.
Ah, so because I have a different viewpoint I'm an idiot, got it.
Call it what you want. It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license. For all the cop knew, he could have a warrant or be suspended. The officer likely would have ran his name and it would have been over.
The guy got a murder charge. I get it. I agree with it. I'm just saying that it was avoidable.
You guys are in full mob mentality right now.
Ah, so because I have a different viewpoint I'm an idiot, got it.
Call it what you want. It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license. For all the cop knew, he could have a warrant or be suspended. The officer likely would have ran his name and it would have been over.
The guy got a murder charge. I get it. I agree with it. I'm just saying that it was avoidable.
You guys are in full mob mentality right now.
Ah, so because I have a different viewpoint I'm an idiot, got it.
Call it what you want. It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license. For all the cop knew, he could have a warrant or be suspended. The officer likely would have ran his name and it would have been over.
Ah, so because I have a different viewpoint I'm an idiot, got it.
Call it what you want. It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license. For all the cop knew, he could have a warrant or be suspended. The officer likely would have ran his name and it would have been over.
The guy got a murder charge. I get it. I agree with it. I'm just saying that it was avoidable.
You guys are in full mob mentality right now.
Or...because I'm at work and it takes too long.
There are literally 20+ individual responses to one post.
Ah, so because I have a different viewpoint I'm an idiot, got it.
Call it what you want. It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license. For all the cop knew, he could have a warrant or be suspended. The officer likely would have ran his name and it would have been over.
The guy got a murder charge. I get it. I agree with it. I'm just saying that it was avoidable.
You guys are in full mob mentality right now.
Is it wrong to see it for what it is? No one is really saying the "cop" shouldn't be arrested, but the situation could have been easily avoided if the driver wasn't an idiot/impaired.
GAF lately has had a very vocal anti-cop majority that kind of makes threads like this become an echo chamber. It is what it is.
OK. You are arguing that this could have been avoided. It sure could have. But instead of blaming the person who is now dead from a bullet to the head, maybe you should focus your blaming on the man who executed a man for closing his car door.Or...because I'm at work and it takes too long.
There are literally 20+ individual responses to one post.
Here's the thing. It's victim blaming. In pretty much any case you can point to things the victim could have done to avoid the situation. Like a rape victim. Yes. If she hadn't been out alone at night she would have avoided her attack. But that's not the point. A case like that, just as in this case, it is totally irrelevant. This Murder happened because a cop needlessly escalated a non-violent situation. The ONLY blame for this, lies with the officer. What the victim could have done differently has nothing to do with the case.
I don't even...
When did it become ok for cops to open people's car doors for no reason? He never had to reach in the vehicle. He wasn't even operating within his jurisdiction. The cop shot someone for no reason. The cop is the impaired idiot, not the victim.
unfortunately, this all would have been avoided if he just gave the officer his license. Or you know, not drive away during a traffic stop.
Not defending the cop, but the victim certainly was in the wrong as well.
Although I'm sure this has been said, and fuckthepolice-gaf has crucified the previous posters
Call it what you want. It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license.
Ah, so because I have a different viewpoint I'm an idiot, got it.
Call it what you want. It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license. For all the cop knew, he could have a warrant or be suspended. The officer likely would have ran his name and it would have been over.
The guy got a murder charge. I get it. I agree with it. I'm just saying that it was avoidable.
You guys are in full mob mentality right now.
Ah, so because I have a different viewpoint I'm an idiot, got it.
Call it what you want. It is the officers JOB to enforce the law. The guy couldn't or wouldn't produce a license. For all the cop knew, he could have a warrant or be suspended. The officer likely would have ran his name and it would have been over.
The guy got a murder charge. I get it. I agree with it. I'm just saying that it was avoidable.
You guys are in full mob mentality right now.
what?Are we equating what a girl wears/out at a specific time of night to a person getting pulled over, not having a license, refusing to do what an officer tells them after being in the wrong, and then trying to drive off with a cop at the door?
The person's not legally allowed to drive the vehicle and may be impaired, but the cop shouldn't be allowed to remove the person from the car? Is this what we're coming to?
Is it wrong to see it for what it is? No one is really saying the "cop" shouldn't be arrested, but the situation could have been easily avoided if the driver wasn't an idiot/impaired.
You must do a lot of selective reading, and miss just how many trip over themselves to defend the police, even with video evidence, because "but but but.."GAF lately has had a very vocal anti-cop majority that kind of makes threads like this become an echo chamber. It is what it is.
Are we equating what a girl wears/out at a specific time of night to a person getting pulled over, not having a license, refusing to do what an officer tells them after being in the wrong, and then trying to drive off with a cop at the door?
The person's not legally allowed to drive the vehicle and may be impaired, but the cop shouldn't be allowed to remove the person from the car? Is this what we're coming to?
You must do a lot of selective reading, and miss just how many trip over themselves to defend the police, even with video evidence, because "but but but"
Nothing he did warranted being shot in the head. He wasn't drunk or an immediate threat to others. The cop should have let him speed off. He has the plates and photographs of his face. It was a pointless escalation by some asshole trying to be super cop.
Are we equating what a girl wears/out at a specific time of night to a person getting pulled over, not having a license, refusing to do what an officer tells them after being in the wrong, and then trying to drive off with a cop at the door?
The person's not legally allowed to drive the vehicle and may be impaired, but the cop shouldn't be allowed to remove the person from the car? Is this what we're coming to?
A Challenger Appears!Are we equating what a girl wears/out at a specific time of night to a person getting pulled over, not having a license, refusing to do what an officer tells them after being in the wrong, and then trying to drive off with a cop at the door?
Are we equating what a girl wears/out at a specific time of night to a person getting pulled over, not having a license, refusing to do what an officer tells them after being in the wrong, and then trying to drive off with a cop at the door?
The person's not legally allowed to drive the vehicle and may be impaired, but the cop shouldn't be allowed to remove the person from the car? Is this what we're coming to?
Guy gets pulled over. Cop asks to see license, guy doesn't have one, and has an alcoholic beverage in the car. Cop asks guy to step outside, person refuses. Cop opens door, guy closes it, starts car, throws it in drive. Cop executes guy, car takes off.
Are we equating what a girl wears/out at a specific time of night to a person getting pulled over, not having a license, refusing to do what an officer tells them after being in the wrong, and then trying to drive off with a cop at the door?
Starting the car was not a great decision, no. That's a bad idea to do at a traffic stop.
But you want to know what's the worst decision? Popping a bullet into a guy's head because he started the car. This cop was getting his rocks off with his authority: Asking constantly for a license that he could have looked up on the computer. Opening the door without any command other than "take off your seatbelt" ? Sounds like he wanted to drag the dude out of the car and do something to Dubose.
This situation could have been avoided if the cop wasn't a power mad son-of-a-bitch murderer
They are extremes on both sides, yes.
Cop firing is not defensible, and pretty much everyone is/should be saying that. I mean, do I have the story wrong after watching the video?
Guy gets pulled over. Cop asks to see license, guy doesn't have one, and has an alcoholic beverage in the car. Cop asks guy to step outside, person refuses. Cop opens door, guy closes it, starts car, throws it in drive. Cop executes guy, car takes off.
They are extremes on both sides, yes.
Cop firing is not defensible, and pretty much everyone is/should be saying that. I mean, do I have the story wrong after watching the video?
Guy gets pulled over. Cop asks to see license, guy doesn't have one, and has an alcoholic beverage in the car. Cop asks guy to step outside, person refuses. Cop opens door, guy closes it, starts car, throws it in drive. Cop executes guy, car takes off.
I can see reason to doubt this considering how this turned out, but I think he just saw DuBose as a flight risk and wanted him out of his car while he ran his info.
The person's not legally allowed to drive the vehicle and may be impaired, but the cop shouldn't be allowed to remove the person from the car? Is this what we're coming to?
Meia..he's campus police, half a mile from campus. It's not his job to pull him over. Therefore, this whole thing would have been avoided if this campus officer did HIS job, and not the job of a traffic cop.They are extremes on both sides, yes.
Cop firing is not defensible, and pretty much everyone is/should be saying that. I mean, do I have the story wrong after watching the video?
Guy gets pulled over. Cop asks to see license, guy doesn't have one, and has an alcoholic beverage in the car. Cop asks guy to step outside, person refuses. Cop opens door, guy closes it, starts car, throws it in drive. Cop executes guy, car takes off.
basically hoping that he ran on foot to have further justification to shoot him.
Meia..he's campus police, half a mile from campus. It's not his job to pull him over. Therefore, this whole thing would have been avoided if this campus officer did HIS job, and not the job of a traffic cop.
Do you understand now why people are frustrated? We're just gonna keep going in circles, aren't we?
Patrol beats are separated into three areas on UC's main campus - Uptown, East and West. Additional patrols work with Cincinnati Police to cover neighborhoods surrounding UC's main campus. UCPD also serves UC's Blue Ash and Clermont campuses.
Officials said the university police shared jurisdiction with city officers on streets around the campus, where the officer began following Mr. Dubose, but where the driver was pulled over and shot is a few blocks away, outside that zone.
What bugs me about certain posts is people saying this could have been avoided if the victim had just done what the cop said. Victim blaming in situations like this is disingenuous at best.They are not "campus police"
https://www.uc.edu/publicsafety/about/police.html
The UCPD patrols the areas around the University as well as the campus itself. Half a mile from campus sounds reasonable.
I don't think the "it wasn't his job" claims are true.. they are only backed by conjecture and the use of the word "campus police."
People in this thread are tearing each other apart when every single person in this thread agrees it was a murder. I don't get it; chill out and unite.
Man, that's some Judge Dredd shit.
It's going to be ridiculous if the cop gets let off on the charge.
What bugs me about certain posts is people saying this could have been avoided if the victim had just done what the cop said. Victim blaming in situations like this is disingenuous at best.
Dude... The driver didn't try to flee FFS.What bugs me is how people don't understand that the cop can be a piece of shit that failed to do his job and was likely on a power trip, AND the situation likely wouldn't have come about to begin with if the driver didn't try to flee the scene in a car. One kind of doesn't exclude the other, that's kind of all I'm saying. The "rape" comparison is silly.