C
omicsAlliance: Jonathan, during the Great Hunt you had various of the Nathaniels mention they built Chronopolis and formed the Anachronauts, both achievements of Kangs not to mention the giant Rama-Tut sphinx head in the future we saw in S.H.I.E.L.D. Kangs traditionally been Nathaniel Richardss distant grandson, especially as recently reinforced in Allan Heinbergs Young Avengers with the character of Iron Lad, but how much should we read into the idea that they might be one and the same?
Jonathan Hickman: Well, this is one of those things where it gets a bit loopy, not just from the time-jumping nature of the years of existing stories, but also from the infinite number of variables I introduced (by dumping every Nathaniel in the Multiverse into the 616 universe).
So, heres how the atemporal situation breaks down in my mind:
The Nathaniel Richards from S.H.I.E.L.D., and the Nathaniel Richards from my first issue (FF#570) is OUR (read NATIVE to the 616) Nathaniel. While the Byrne and Defalco version (not a victor of the Great Hunt and now dead as of FF#582) was not, he was, for a time, the most active Nathaniel in the normal Marvel Universe (as our Nathaniel was busy rewriting the future and OTHER THINGS).
All of this will become a bit more delineated when we meet (Bryne/Defalco) Nathaniels Reed at a later date. As for your primary question regarding Kang, yes, he is a distant grandson of a Nathaniel Richards not ours
but the BEAST Nathaniel.
I probably should make a diagram of all this at some point. Hope that answers your question.
http://comicsalliance.com/ff-1-annotations-hickman/?trackback=tsmclip