entremet
Member
I saw this in the theaters with my cousin and thought it was rather amazing at the time. I need to rewatch and this article made me hungry to do so.
http://io9.gizmodo.com/contact-is-more-than-a-movie-about-science-vs-religion-1796775188
http://io9.gizmodo.com/contact-is-more-than-a-movie-about-science-vs-religion-1796775188
When Contact first opened, 20 years ago today, I thought it was a masterpiece. For a soon-to-be high school senior, Robert Zemeckis adaptation of Carl Sagans novel was the perfect Hollywood mix of thought-provoking ideas and spectacle. It wasnt until years later I realized how divided fellow films fans were on the film. So I decided to look back and see what Contact has to offer in 2017.
Back in 1997, one of the biggest reasons Contact made such an impact on me was its captivating depiction of the eternal struggle between science and religion. The argument is the core of the film and, frankly, not subtle in the least, but it fascinated me. Contact takes the two equally compelling sides of the argument and personifies them with Jodie Fosters scientist Ellie Arroway and Matthew McConaugheys religious scholar Palmer Joss. Science demands proof, but religion makes it okay to believe without proof. Watching the film again, when Palmer asks Ellie if she loves her father and then asks her to prove it, I cant imagine a simpler, more understandable breakdown of the great debate.
However, watching it two decades later, what stands out to me in Contact is Zemeckis depiction of media and technology.