Who's fault is it?
What do you think happened?
Or their observations could have been skewed or embellished if they were prejudiced. I mean, they followed him through the store and he didn't fire a single shot, it kept clicking, so wouldn't they put two and two together that maybe it's not real or not loaded? Why did they decide to play hero when they could have ran to the front and alerted security? They escalated the situation.
And followed him around the store...and warned other shoppers to stay away from him...
Guilty of making a not-dangerous situation seem so dangerous cops used lethal force.
The question where they are involved is one of whether or not they might have been unreasonably suspicious of this guy (because of his race), and panicked hysterically.
If that was the case (and the guy wasn't causing a problem, they only perceived that he was), then the concern that you cite, and defend actually becomes the problem.
Is there anyway to force the police to release the security cam footage?
I want to see video. "He wouldn't drop the weapon when asked" reeks of cop bullshit to me. Also I want to see this waving before I come to conclusion.
What's the difference between alerting security and calling the cops? Security just would have called the cops. They aren't going to risk their ass to confront someone if they truly believe there to be a risk, nor should they.
If the following facts are true; He was carrying around a toy gun pointing it at people, or even alternatively; if he were carrying around a toy gun that had not yet purchased, then yes, the cops should be called. First, for aggravated assault. Second, for larceny.
Probably file a judgment lien on all his property?
His mom's statement about what she heard over the phone is pretty damning for the police.
Probably file a judgment lien on all his property?
I want to see video. "He wouldn't drop the weapon when asked" reeks of cop bullshit to me. Also I want to see this waving before I come to conclusion.
What's the difference between alerting security and calling the cops? Security just would have called the cops. They aren't going to risk their ass to confront someone if they truly believe there to be a risk, nor should they.
...Not quite.
Not in a court of law, anyway.
Surely security would have had eyes on a person in the store to follow him around enough to know he just got the toy gun from inside the store.
Which tells me if they can't even do this they need to change their policy about letting these things roam freely about their store. Either don't sell them at all or box them up and carry them up to the front for the customer to prevent this type of shit.
Nobody's fault it is, as far as i can see. But i was not there, so i cant say for certain. But people easely blaming the cops also cant say for certain.
What i do can say however, is if somebody is waving what seems like a gun at people and does not drop it if i ask him to. I would shoot to if i was a cop because i would be afriad i will be shot. Thats why im glad im not a cop and would never have to be in such situation.
The people who think the cops didn't kill him aren't a minority
Coroner declared it a homicide. That's a good thing, right?
Coroner declared it a homicide. That's a good thing, right?
If the following facts are true; He was carrying around a toy gun pointing it at people, or even alternatively; if he were carrying around a toy gun that had not yet purchased, then yes, the cops should be called. First, for aggravated assault. Second, for larceny.
Nobody's fault it is, as far as i can see. But i was not there, so i cant say for certain. But people easely blaming the cops also cant say for certain.
What i do can say however, is if somebody is waving what seems like a gun at people and does not drop it if i ask him to. I would shoot to if i was a cop because i would be afriad i will be shot. Thats why im glad im not a cop and would never have to be in such situation.
Coroner declared it a homicide. That's a good thing, right?
![]()
White guys open carry real weapons in department store, live to tell about it.
Black guy does the same thing with a toy gun, is killed by cops.
I wonder why...
What the fuck, America does not have regulations on toy guns looking like actual toy guns? (ie. orange tip)
What the fuck, America does not have regulations on toy guns looking like actual toy guns? (ie. orange tip)
A bunch of white guys waving their guns around a Walmart.......
"If" is being used a lot here.
You have hearsay stating that he was waving it around; a single phone call in what is undoubtedly a populated store. Ohio is an open-carry state. You can walk around with a gun out in stores. The people who called are fallible; they could be paranoid and make incorrect assumptions about what thy're seeing. Should someone run the risk of getting shot by police because of an assumption, even when they're doing nothing wrong? A conclusion that relies on an "if" statement shouldn't even exist And larceny is trolling?
People are dubious of police officers in these situations, because police officers have been proven to be biased against black americans, and have a notorious history of maiming, and killing black americans with little, or no reason to do so.
Personally, I think that they have a lot of unilateral power, and that a high degree of scrutiny is warranted, if they want to keep that power.
Coroner declared it a homicide. That's a good thing, right?
Carrying, not waving
Appropriate.Doesn't mean much. Even when it is a justified shooting, that just means it is legally labeled as a privileged homicide. Still a homicide, but the cop was acting under color of law.
It was an air rifle, not a toy gun. Air rifles can legally be extremely realistic replicas of actual bullet guns.
It just means a confirmation that he died of wounds inflicted by another person, which is obvious and means nothing in terms of any legal action.
A killing is always a homicide. Doesn't mean anything.
Doesn't mean much. Even when it is a justified shooting, that just means it is legally labeled as a privileged homicide. Still a homicide, but the cop was acting under color of law.
Expected. One person killing another is always classified as a homicide by a coroner.
But those are real gunsCarrying, not waving
"and the police start shooting and they said Get on the ground, but he was already on the ground because they had shot him"
hmm. I think there might be something wrong here, but you never know in America
Carrying, not waving
As much as I want to blame police for this, none of this would have happened if they didn't sell realistic toy guns in retail, or in general. What's the point of them, seriously!? It's fucking ludicrous. I honestly don't' see the point in them existing at all.
"If" is being used a lot here.
You have hearsay stating that he was waving it around; a single phone call in what is undoubtedly a populated store. Ohio is an open-carry state. You can walk around with a gun out in stores. The people who called are fallible; they could be paranoid and make incorrect assumptions about what thy're seeing. Should someone run the risk of getting shot by police because of an assumption, even when they're doing nothing wrong? A conclusion that relies on an "if" statement shouldn't even exist.
And the larceny comment has to be a troll. I've been sitting here trying to figure out if that's the case for a few minutes now.
"If." If he was waving it around and pointing it at people.
You say people can't say anything for certain about this situation, even after the fact. The police and the people who called 911 made an assumption and never considered that the guy was purchasing a gun/toy gun from Wal-Mart, a chain of stories that sells guns. If we can't pass judgment on the situation, then how was there enough evidence to justify immediate deadly force in an open-carry state?
A killing is always a homicide. Doesn't mean anything.
Why are a good number of these guns owners insistent on being complete assholes in public?
They make the 2nd Amendment look REALLY bad...
damn that actually is like 5 minutes from where I live. Beavercreek is pretty much the nice area in Dayton, and I know they had an earlier issue with approving bus stops in that area.